Cargando…
Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations
Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen contributes a substantial amount of man-made radiation dose to patients and use of this modality is on the increase. This study intends to compare radiation dose and image quality using dose modulation techniques and weight- based protocol exposure parameters...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098552 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56085 |
_version_ | 1782176383524405248 |
---|---|
author | Livingstone, Roshan S. Dinakaran, Paul M. Cherian, Rekha S. Eapen, Anu |
author_facet | Livingstone, Roshan S. Dinakaran, Paul M. Cherian, Rekha S. Eapen, Anu |
author_sort | Livingstone, Roshan S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen contributes a substantial amount of man-made radiation dose to patients and use of this modality is on the increase. This study intends to compare radiation dose and image quality using dose modulation techniques and weight- based protocol exposure parameters for biphasic abdominal CT. Using a six-slice CT scanner, a prospective study of 426 patients who underwent abdominal CT examinations was performed. Constant tube potentials of 90 kV and 120 kV were used for all arterial and portal venous phase respectively. The tube current-time product for weight-based protocol was optimized according to patient's body weight; this was automatically selected in dose modulations. The effective dose using weight-based protocol, angular and z-axis dose modulation was 11.3 mSv, 9.5 mSv and 8.2 mSv respectively for the patient's body weight ranging from 40 to 60 kg. For patients of body weights ranging 60 to 80 kg, the effective doses were 13.2 mSv, 11.2 mSv and 10.6 mSv respectively. The use of dose modulation technique resulted in a reduction of 16 to 28% in radiation dose with acceptable diagnostic accuracy in comparison to the use of weight-based protocol settings. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2807144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28071442010-01-22 Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations Livingstone, Roshan S. Dinakaran, Paul M. Cherian, Rekha S. Eapen, Anu J Med Phys Original Article Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen contributes a substantial amount of man-made radiation dose to patients and use of this modality is on the increase. This study intends to compare radiation dose and image quality using dose modulation techniques and weight- based protocol exposure parameters for biphasic abdominal CT. Using a six-slice CT scanner, a prospective study of 426 patients who underwent abdominal CT examinations was performed. Constant tube potentials of 90 kV and 120 kV were used for all arterial and portal venous phase respectively. The tube current-time product for weight-based protocol was optimized according to patient's body weight; this was automatically selected in dose modulations. The effective dose using weight-based protocol, angular and z-axis dose modulation was 11.3 mSv, 9.5 mSv and 8.2 mSv respectively for the patient's body weight ranging from 40 to 60 kg. For patients of body weights ranging 60 to 80 kg, the effective doses were 13.2 mSv, 11.2 mSv and 10.6 mSv respectively. The use of dose modulation technique resulted in a reduction of 16 to 28% in radiation dose with acceptable diagnostic accuracy in comparison to the use of weight-based protocol settings. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2807144/ /pubmed/20098552 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56085 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Livingstone, Roshan S. Dinakaran, Paul M. Cherian, Rekha S. Eapen, Anu Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations |
title | Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations |
title_full | Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations |
title_fullStr | Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations |
title_short | Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations |
title_sort | comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098552 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.56085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT livingstoneroshans comparisonofradiationdosesusingweightbasedprotocolanddosemodulationtechniquesforpatientsundergoingbiphasicabdominalcomputedtomographyexaminations AT dinakaranpaulm comparisonofradiationdosesusingweightbasedprotocolanddosemodulationtechniquesforpatientsundergoingbiphasicabdominalcomputedtomographyexaminations AT cherianrekhas comparisonofradiationdosesusingweightbasedprotocolanddosemodulationtechniquesforpatientsundergoingbiphasicabdominalcomputedtomographyexaminations AT eapenanu comparisonofradiationdosesusingweightbasedprotocolanddosemodulationtechniquesforpatientsundergoingbiphasicabdominalcomputedtomographyexaminations |