Cargando…

Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces

BACKGROUND: Individuals' faces communicate a great deal of information about them. Although some of this information tends to be perceptually obvious (such as race and sex), much of it is perceptually ambiguous, without clear or obvious visual cues. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we found...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rule, Nicholas O., Ambady, Nalini
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20090906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008733
_version_ 1782176405583298560
author Rule, Nicholas O.
Ambady, Nalini
author_facet Rule, Nicholas O.
Ambady, Nalini
author_sort Rule, Nicholas O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals' faces communicate a great deal of information about them. Although some of this information tends to be perceptually obvious (such as race and sex), much of it is perceptually ambiguous, without clear or obvious visual cues. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we found that individuals' political affiliations could be accurately discerned from their faces. In Study 1, perceivers were able to accurately distinguish whether U.S. Senate candidates were either Democrats or Republicans based on photos of their faces. Study 2 showed that these effects extended to Democrat and Republican college students, based on their senior yearbook photos. Study 3 then showed that these judgments were related to differences in perceived traits among the Democrat and Republican faces. Republicans were perceived as more powerful than Democrats. Moreover, as individual targets were perceived to be more powerful, they were more likely to be perceived as Republicans by others. Similarly, as individual targets were perceived to be warmer, they were more likely to be perceived as Democrats. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that perceivers' beliefs about who is a Democrat and Republican may be based on perceptions of traits stereotypically associated with the two political parties and that, indeed, the guidance of these stereotypes may lead to categorizations of others' political affiliations at rates significantly more accurate than chance guessing.
format Text
id pubmed-2807452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28074522010-01-21 Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces Rule, Nicholas O. Ambady, Nalini PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Individuals' faces communicate a great deal of information about them. Although some of this information tends to be perceptually obvious (such as race and sex), much of it is perceptually ambiguous, without clear or obvious visual cues. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we found that individuals' political affiliations could be accurately discerned from their faces. In Study 1, perceivers were able to accurately distinguish whether U.S. Senate candidates were either Democrats or Republicans based on photos of their faces. Study 2 showed that these effects extended to Democrat and Republican college students, based on their senior yearbook photos. Study 3 then showed that these judgments were related to differences in perceived traits among the Democrat and Republican faces. Republicans were perceived as more powerful than Democrats. Moreover, as individual targets were perceived to be more powerful, they were more likely to be perceived as Republicans by others. Similarly, as individual targets were perceived to be warmer, they were more likely to be perceived as Democrats. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that perceivers' beliefs about who is a Democrat and Republican may be based on perceptions of traits stereotypically associated with the two political parties and that, indeed, the guidance of these stereotypes may lead to categorizations of others' political affiliations at rates significantly more accurate than chance guessing. Public Library of Science 2010-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2807452/ /pubmed/20090906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008733 Text en Rule, Ambady. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rule, Nicholas O.
Ambady, Nalini
Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces
title Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces
title_full Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces
title_fullStr Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces
title_full_unstemmed Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces
title_short Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces
title_sort democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20090906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008733
work_keys_str_mv AT rulenicholaso democratsandrepublicanscanbedifferentiatedfromtheirfaces
AT ambadynalini democratsandrepublicanscanbedifferentiatedfromtheirfaces