Cargando…

Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study

BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence showing that male circumcision (MC) reduces HIV infection and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In Rwanda, where adult HIV prevalence is 3%, MC is not a traditional practice. The Rwanda National AIDS Commission modelled cost and effects of MC at diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binagwaho, Agnes, Pegurri, Elisabetta, Muita, Jane, Bertozzi, Stefano
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211
_version_ 1782176461725106176
author Binagwaho, Agnes
Pegurri, Elisabetta
Muita, Jane
Bertozzi, Stefano
author_facet Binagwaho, Agnes
Pegurri, Elisabetta
Muita, Jane
Bertozzi, Stefano
author_sort Binagwaho, Agnes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence showing that male circumcision (MC) reduces HIV infection and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In Rwanda, where adult HIV prevalence is 3%, MC is not a traditional practice. The Rwanda National AIDS Commission modelled cost and effects of MC at different ages to inform policy and programmatic decisions in relation to introducing MC. This study was necessary because the MC debate in Southern Africa has focused primarily on MC for adults. Further, this is the first time, to our knowledge, that a cost-effectiveness study on MC has been carried out in a country where HIV prevalence is below 5%. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A cost-effectiveness model was developed and applied to three hypothetical cohorts in Rwanda: newborns, adolescents, and adult men. Effectiveness was defined as the number of HIV infections averted, and was calculated as the product of the number of people susceptible to HIV infection in the cohort, the HIV incidence rate at different ages, and the protective effect of MC; discounted back to the year of circumcision and summed over the life expectancy of the circumcised person. Direct costs were based on interviews with experienced health care providers to determine inputs involved in the procedure (from consumables to staff time) and related prices. Other costs included training, patient counselling, treatment of adverse events, and promotion campaigns, and they were adjusted for the averted lifetime cost of health care (antiretroviral therapy [ART], opportunistic infection [OI], laboratory tests). One-way sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the main inputs of the model, and thresholds were calculated at which each intervention is no longer cost-saving and at which an intervention costs more than one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per life-year gained. Results: Neonatal MC is less expensive than adolescent and adult MC (US$15 instead of US$59 per procedure) and is cost-saving (the cost-effectiveness ratio is negative), even though savings from infant circumcision will be realized later in time. The cost per infection averted is US$3,932 for adolescent MC and US$4,949 for adult MC. Results for infant MC appear robust. Infant MC remains highly cost-effective across a reasonable range of variation in the base case scenario. Adolescent MC is highly cost-effective for the base case scenario but this high cost-effectiveness is not robust to small changes in the input variables. Adult MC is neither cost-saving nor highly cost-effective when considering only the direct benefit for the circumcised man. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that Rwanda should be simultaneously scaling up circumcision across a broad range of age groups, with high priority to the very young. Infant MC can be integrated into existing health services (i.e., neonatal visits and vaccination sessions) and over time has better potential than adolescent and adult circumcision to achieve the very high coverage of the population required for maximal reduction of HIV incidence. In the presence of infant MC, adolescent and adult MC would evolve into a “catch-up” campaign that would be needed at the start of the program but would eventually become superfluous. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Text
id pubmed-2808207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28082072010-01-21 Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study Binagwaho, Agnes Pegurri, Elisabetta Muita, Jane Bertozzi, Stefano PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence showing that male circumcision (MC) reduces HIV infection and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In Rwanda, where adult HIV prevalence is 3%, MC is not a traditional practice. The Rwanda National AIDS Commission modelled cost and effects of MC at different ages to inform policy and programmatic decisions in relation to introducing MC. This study was necessary because the MC debate in Southern Africa has focused primarily on MC for adults. Further, this is the first time, to our knowledge, that a cost-effectiveness study on MC has been carried out in a country where HIV prevalence is below 5%. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A cost-effectiveness model was developed and applied to three hypothetical cohorts in Rwanda: newborns, adolescents, and adult men. Effectiveness was defined as the number of HIV infections averted, and was calculated as the product of the number of people susceptible to HIV infection in the cohort, the HIV incidence rate at different ages, and the protective effect of MC; discounted back to the year of circumcision and summed over the life expectancy of the circumcised person. Direct costs were based on interviews with experienced health care providers to determine inputs involved in the procedure (from consumables to staff time) and related prices. Other costs included training, patient counselling, treatment of adverse events, and promotion campaigns, and they were adjusted for the averted lifetime cost of health care (antiretroviral therapy [ART], opportunistic infection [OI], laboratory tests). One-way sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the main inputs of the model, and thresholds were calculated at which each intervention is no longer cost-saving and at which an intervention costs more than one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per life-year gained. Results: Neonatal MC is less expensive than adolescent and adult MC (US$15 instead of US$59 per procedure) and is cost-saving (the cost-effectiveness ratio is negative), even though savings from infant circumcision will be realized later in time. The cost per infection averted is US$3,932 for adolescent MC and US$4,949 for adult MC. Results for infant MC appear robust. Infant MC remains highly cost-effective across a reasonable range of variation in the base case scenario. Adolescent MC is highly cost-effective for the base case scenario but this high cost-effectiveness is not robust to small changes in the input variables. Adult MC is neither cost-saving nor highly cost-effective when considering only the direct benefit for the circumcised man. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that Rwanda should be simultaneously scaling up circumcision across a broad range of age groups, with high priority to the very young. Infant MC can be integrated into existing health services (i.e., neonatal visits and vaccination sessions) and over time has better potential than adolescent and adult circumcision to achieve the very high coverage of the population required for maximal reduction of HIV incidence. In the presence of infant MC, adolescent and adult MC would evolve into a “catch-up” campaign that would be needed at the start of the program but would eventually become superfluous. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2010-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2808207/ /pubmed/20098721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211 Text en Binagwaho et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Binagwaho, Agnes
Pegurri, Elisabetta
Muita, Jane
Bertozzi, Stefano
Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study
title Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study
title_full Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study
title_fullStr Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study
title_full_unstemmed Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study
title_short Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study
title_sort male circumcision at different ages in rwanda: a cost-effectiveness study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211
work_keys_str_mv AT binagwahoagnes malecircumcisionatdifferentagesinrwandaacosteffectivenessstudy
AT pegurrielisabetta malecircumcisionatdifferentagesinrwandaacosteffectivenessstudy
AT muitajane malecircumcisionatdifferentagesinrwandaacosteffectivenessstudy
AT bertozzistefano malecircumcisionatdifferentagesinrwandaacosteffectivenessstudy