Cargando…

Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training

BACKGROUND: Graduate entry medicine is a recent innovation in UK medical training. Evidence is sparse at present as to progress and attainment on these programmes. Shared clinical rotations, between an established 5-year and a new graduate entry course, provide the opportunity to compare achievement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manning, Gillian, Garrud, Paul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20028543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-76
_version_ 1782176472174166016
author Manning, Gillian
Garrud, Paul
author_facet Manning, Gillian
Garrud, Paul
author_sort Manning, Gillian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Graduate entry medicine is a recent innovation in UK medical training. Evidence is sparse at present as to progress and attainment on these programmes. Shared clinical rotations, between an established 5-year and a new graduate entry course, provide the opportunity to compare achievement on clinical assessments. To compare completion and attainment on clinical phase assessments between students on a 4-year graduate entry course and an established 5-year undergraduate medicine course. METHODS: Overall completion rates for the 4 and 5 year courses, fails at first attempt, and scores on 14 clinical assessments, were compared between 171 graduate-entry and 450 undergraduate medical students at the University of Nottingham, comprising two graduating cohorts. Percentage assessment marks were converted to z-scores separately for each graduating year and the normalised marks then combined into a single dataset. Z-score transformed percentage marks were analysed by multivariate analysis of variance and univariate analyses of variance for each summative assessment. Numbers of fails at first attempt were analysed aggregated across all assessments initially, then separately for each assessment using χ(2). RESULTS: Completion rates were around 90% overall and significantly higher in the graduate entry course. Failures of assessments overall were similar, but a higher proportion of graduate entry students failed the final OSLER. Mean performance on clinical assessments showed a significant overall difference, made up of lower performance on 4 of 5 knowledge-based exams (as well as higher performance on the first exam) by the graduate entry group, but similar levels of performance on all the skills-based and attitudinal assessments. CONCLUSIONS: High completion rates are encouraging. The lower performance in some knowledge-based exams may reflect lower prior educational attainment, a substantially different demographic profile (age, gender), or an artefact of the first 2 years of a new graduate entry programme.
format Text
id pubmed-2808300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28083002010-01-20 Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training Manning, Gillian Garrud, Paul BMC Med Educ Research article BACKGROUND: Graduate entry medicine is a recent innovation in UK medical training. Evidence is sparse at present as to progress and attainment on these programmes. Shared clinical rotations, between an established 5-year and a new graduate entry course, provide the opportunity to compare achievement on clinical assessments. To compare completion and attainment on clinical phase assessments between students on a 4-year graduate entry course and an established 5-year undergraduate medicine course. METHODS: Overall completion rates for the 4 and 5 year courses, fails at first attempt, and scores on 14 clinical assessments, were compared between 171 graduate-entry and 450 undergraduate medical students at the University of Nottingham, comprising two graduating cohorts. Percentage assessment marks were converted to z-scores separately for each graduating year and the normalised marks then combined into a single dataset. Z-score transformed percentage marks were analysed by multivariate analysis of variance and univariate analyses of variance for each summative assessment. Numbers of fails at first attempt were analysed aggregated across all assessments initially, then separately for each assessment using χ(2). RESULTS: Completion rates were around 90% overall and significantly higher in the graduate entry course. Failures of assessments overall were similar, but a higher proportion of graduate entry students failed the final OSLER. Mean performance on clinical assessments showed a significant overall difference, made up of lower performance on 4 of 5 knowledge-based exams (as well as higher performance on the first exam) by the graduate entry group, but similar levels of performance on all the skills-based and attitudinal assessments. CONCLUSIONS: High completion rates are encouraging. The lower performance in some knowledge-based exams may reflect lower prior educational attainment, a substantially different demographic profile (age, gender), or an artefact of the first 2 years of a new graduate entry programme. BioMed Central 2009-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2808300/ /pubmed/20028543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-76 Text en Copyright ©2009 Manning and Garrud; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Manning, Gillian
Garrud, Paul
Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training
title Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training
title_full Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training
title_fullStr Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training
title_full_unstemmed Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training
title_short Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training
title_sort comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20028543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-76
work_keys_str_mv AT manninggillian comparativeattainmentof5yearundergraduateand4yeargraduateentrymedicalstudentsmovingintofoundationtraining
AT garrudpaul comparativeattainmentof5yearundergraduateand4yeargraduateentrymedicalstudentsmovingintofoundationtraining