Cargando…
Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?
PURPOSE: To report the results of surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts (BA with PDEBD) with special reference to hepatic portocholecystostomy (HPC) operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study reviews records of children operated for BA with PDEBD. The typ...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2809458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177440 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.54817 |
_version_ | 1782176626267652096 |
---|---|
author | Chandrasekharam, V. V. S. |
author_facet | Chandrasekharam, V. V. S. |
author_sort | Chandrasekharam, V. V. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To report the results of surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts (BA with PDEBD) with special reference to hepatic portocholecystostomy (HPC) operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study reviews records of children operated for BA with PDEBD. The type of operation, results of surgery, postoperative course and complications during follow-up are noted. RESULTS: Five children (mean age 83 days) underwent surgery for biliary atresia with patent extra hepatic bile ducts. The diagnosis was confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography in each case. Three children underwent HPC and two had standard hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE) as HPC was not technically feasible. The operation was considered successful in three of five children (60%, two HPC and one HPE), partially successful in one. The mean follow-up was 22 months. None of the children with HPC had cholangitis at follow-up; one child with HPE had recurrent cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary atresia (BA) with PDEBD may be a variant with a fair chance for surgical success. When feasible, HPC may be a good treatment option in this group with acceptable results and practically no risk of postoperative cholangitis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2809458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28094582010-02-22 Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? Chandrasekharam, V. V. S. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article PURPOSE: To report the results of surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts (BA with PDEBD) with special reference to hepatic portocholecystostomy (HPC) operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study reviews records of children operated for BA with PDEBD. The type of operation, results of surgery, postoperative course and complications during follow-up are noted. RESULTS: Five children (mean age 83 days) underwent surgery for biliary atresia with patent extra hepatic bile ducts. The diagnosis was confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography in each case. Three children underwent HPC and two had standard hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE) as HPC was not technically feasible. The operation was considered successful in three of five children (60%, two HPC and one HPE), partially successful in one. The mean follow-up was 22 months. None of the children with HPC had cholangitis at follow-up; one child with HPE had recurrent cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary atresia (BA) with PDEBD may be a variant with a fair chance for surgical success. When feasible, HPC may be a good treatment option in this group with acceptable results and practically no risk of postoperative cholangitis. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2809458/ /pubmed/20177440 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.54817 Text en © Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chandrasekharam, V. V. S. Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? |
title | Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? |
title_full | Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? |
title_fullStr | Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? |
title_short | Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? |
title_sort | surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2809458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177440 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.54817 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandrasekharamvvs surgicaltreatmentofbiliaryatresiawithpatentdistalextrahepaticbileductsishepaticportocholecystostomytherightchoice |