Cargando…

Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?

PURPOSE: To report the results of surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts (BA with PDEBD) with special reference to hepatic portocholecystostomy (HPC) operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study reviews records of children operated for BA with PDEBD. The typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2809458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177440
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.54817
_version_ 1782176626267652096
author Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
author_facet Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
author_sort Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report the results of surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts (BA with PDEBD) with special reference to hepatic portocholecystostomy (HPC) operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study reviews records of children operated for BA with PDEBD. The type of operation, results of surgery, postoperative course and complications during follow-up are noted. RESULTS: Five children (mean age 83 days) underwent surgery for biliary atresia with patent extra hepatic bile ducts. The diagnosis was confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography in each case. Three children underwent HPC and two had standard hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE) as HPC was not technically feasible. The operation was considered successful in three of five children (60%, two HPC and one HPE), partially successful in one. The mean follow-up was 22 months. None of the children with HPC had cholangitis at follow-up; one child with HPE had recurrent cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary atresia (BA) with PDEBD may be a variant with a fair chance for surgical success. When feasible, HPC may be a good treatment option in this group with acceptable results and practically no risk of postoperative cholangitis.
format Text
id pubmed-2809458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28094582010-02-22 Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice? Chandrasekharam, V. V. S. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article PURPOSE: To report the results of surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts (BA with PDEBD) with special reference to hepatic portocholecystostomy (HPC) operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study reviews records of children operated for BA with PDEBD. The type of operation, results of surgery, postoperative course and complications during follow-up are noted. RESULTS: Five children (mean age 83 days) underwent surgery for biliary atresia with patent extra hepatic bile ducts. The diagnosis was confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography in each case. Three children underwent HPC and two had standard hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE) as HPC was not technically feasible. The operation was considered successful in three of five children (60%, two HPC and one HPE), partially successful in one. The mean follow-up was 22 months. None of the children with HPC had cholangitis at follow-up; one child with HPE had recurrent cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary atresia (BA) with PDEBD may be a variant with a fair chance for surgical success. When feasible, HPC may be a good treatment option in this group with acceptable results and practically no risk of postoperative cholangitis. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2809458/ /pubmed/20177440 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.54817 Text en © Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?
title Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?
title_full Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?
title_fullStr Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?
title_short Surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: Is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?
title_sort surgical treatment of biliary atresia with patent distal extra hepatic bile ducts: is hepatic portocholecystostomy the right choice?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2809458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177440
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.54817
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrasekharamvvs surgicaltreatmentofbiliaryatresiawithpatentdistalextrahepaticbileductsishepaticportocholecystostomytherightchoice