Cargando…
Invariant Natural Killer T-Cell Control of Type 1 Diabetes: A Dendritic Cell Genetic Decision of a Silver Bullet or Russian Roulette
OBJECTIVE: In part, activation of invariant natural killer T (iNKT)-cells with the superagonist α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) inhibits the development of T-cell–mediated autoimmune type 1 diabetes in NOD mice by inducing the downstream differentiation of antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2809954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19903740 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db09-1116 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: In part, activation of invariant natural killer T (iNKT)-cells with the superagonist α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) inhibits the development of T-cell–mediated autoimmune type 1 diabetes in NOD mice by inducing the downstream differentiation of antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) to an immunotolerogenic state. However, in other systems iNKT-cell activation has an adjuvant-like effect that enhances rather than suppresses various immunological responses. Thus, we tested whether in some circumstances genetic variation would enable activated iNKT-cells to support rather than inhibit type 1 diabetes development. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We tested whether iNKT-conditioned DCs in NOD mice and a major histocompatibility complex–matched C57BL/6 (B6) background congenic stock differed in capacity to inhibit type 1 diabetes induced by the adoptive transfer of pathogenic AI4 CD8 T-cells. RESULTS: Unlike those of NOD origin, iNKT-conditioned DCs in the B6 background stock matured to a state that actually supported rather than inhibited AI4 T-cell–induced type 1 diabetes. The induction of a differing activity pattern of T-cell costimulatory molecules varying in capacity to override programmed death-ligand-1 inhibitory effects contributes to the respective ability of iNKT-conditioned DCs in NOD and B6 background mice to inhibit or support type 1 diabetes development. Genetic differences inherent to both iNKT-cells and DCs contribute to their varying interactions in NOD and B6.H2(g7) mice. CONCLUSIONS: This great variability in the interactions between iNKT-cells and DCs in two inbred mouse strains should raise a cautionary note about considering manipulation of this axis as a potential type 1 diabetes prevention therapy in genetically heterogeneous humans. |
---|