Cargando…
Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006
SETTING: Under India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), >15% of previously-treated patients in the reported 2006 patient cohort defaulted from anti-tuberculosis treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing, characteristics, and risk factors for default amongst re-treatm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20111727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008873 |
_version_ | 1782176676308844544 |
---|---|
author | Jha, Ugra Mohan Satyanarayana, Srinath Dewan, Puneet K. Chadha, Sarabjit Wares, Fraser Sahu, Suvanand Gupta, Devesh Chauhan, L. S. |
author_facet | Jha, Ugra Mohan Satyanarayana, Srinath Dewan, Puneet K. Chadha, Sarabjit Wares, Fraser Sahu, Suvanand Gupta, Devesh Chauhan, L. S. |
author_sort | Jha, Ugra Mohan |
collection | PubMed |
description | SETTING: Under India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), >15% of previously-treated patients in the reported 2006 patient cohort defaulted from anti-tuberculosis treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing, characteristics, and risk factors for default amongst re-treatment TB patients. METHODOLOGY: For this case-control study, in 90 randomly-selected programme units treatment records were abstracted from all 2006 defaulters from the RNTCP re-treatment regimen (cases), with one consecutively-selected non-defaulter per case. Patients who interrupted anti-tuberculosis treatment for >2 months were classified as defaulters. RESULTS: 1,141 defaulters and 1,189 non-defaulters were included. The median duration of treatment prior to default was 81 days (25%–75% interquartile range 44–117 days) and documented retrieval efforts after treatment interruption were inadequate. Defaulters were more likely to have been male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–1.7), have previously defaulted anti-tuberculosis treatment (aOR 1.3 95%CI 1.1–1.6], have previous treatment from non-RNTCP providers (AOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0–1.6], or have public health facility-based treatment observation (aOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1–1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Amongst the large number of re-treatment patients in India, default occurs early and often. Improved pre-treatment counseling and community-based treatment provision may reduce default rates. Efforts to retrieve treatment interrupters prior to default require strengthening. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2810342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28103422010-01-29 Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 Jha, Ugra Mohan Satyanarayana, Srinath Dewan, Puneet K. Chadha, Sarabjit Wares, Fraser Sahu, Suvanand Gupta, Devesh Chauhan, L. S. PLoS One Research Article SETTING: Under India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), >15% of previously-treated patients in the reported 2006 patient cohort defaulted from anti-tuberculosis treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing, characteristics, and risk factors for default amongst re-treatment TB patients. METHODOLOGY: For this case-control study, in 90 randomly-selected programme units treatment records were abstracted from all 2006 defaulters from the RNTCP re-treatment regimen (cases), with one consecutively-selected non-defaulter per case. Patients who interrupted anti-tuberculosis treatment for >2 months were classified as defaulters. RESULTS: 1,141 defaulters and 1,189 non-defaulters were included. The median duration of treatment prior to default was 81 days (25%–75% interquartile range 44–117 days) and documented retrieval efforts after treatment interruption were inadequate. Defaulters were more likely to have been male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–1.7), have previously defaulted anti-tuberculosis treatment (aOR 1.3 95%CI 1.1–1.6], have previous treatment from non-RNTCP providers (AOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0–1.6], or have public health facility-based treatment observation (aOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1–1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Amongst the large number of re-treatment patients in India, default occurs early and often. Improved pre-treatment counseling and community-based treatment provision may reduce default rates. Efforts to retrieve treatment interrupters prior to default require strengthening. Public Library of Science 2010-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2810342/ /pubmed/20111727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008873 Text en Jha et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jha, Ugra Mohan Satyanarayana, Srinath Dewan, Puneet K. Chadha, Sarabjit Wares, Fraser Sahu, Suvanand Gupta, Devesh Chauhan, L. S. Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 |
title | Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 |
title_full | Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 |
title_fullStr | Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 |
title_short | Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 |
title_sort | risk factors for treatment default among re-treatment tuberculosis patients in india, 2006 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20111727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008873 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jhaugramohan riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006 AT satyanarayanasrinath riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006 AT dewanpuneetk riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006 AT chadhasarabjit riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006 AT waresfraser riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006 AT sahusuvanand riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006 AT guptadevesh riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006 AT chauhanls riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006 |