Cargando…

Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006

SETTING: Under India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), >15% of previously-treated patients in the reported 2006 patient cohort defaulted from anti-tuberculosis treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing, characteristics, and risk factors for default amongst re-treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jha, Ugra Mohan, Satyanarayana, Srinath, Dewan, Puneet K., Chadha, Sarabjit, Wares, Fraser, Sahu, Suvanand, Gupta, Devesh, Chauhan, L. S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20111727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008873
_version_ 1782176676308844544
author Jha, Ugra Mohan
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dewan, Puneet K.
Chadha, Sarabjit
Wares, Fraser
Sahu, Suvanand
Gupta, Devesh
Chauhan, L. S.
author_facet Jha, Ugra Mohan
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dewan, Puneet K.
Chadha, Sarabjit
Wares, Fraser
Sahu, Suvanand
Gupta, Devesh
Chauhan, L. S.
author_sort Jha, Ugra Mohan
collection PubMed
description SETTING: Under India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), >15% of previously-treated patients in the reported 2006 patient cohort defaulted from anti-tuberculosis treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing, characteristics, and risk factors for default amongst re-treatment TB patients. METHODOLOGY: For this case-control study, in 90 randomly-selected programme units treatment records were abstracted from all 2006 defaulters from the RNTCP re-treatment regimen (cases), with one consecutively-selected non-defaulter per case. Patients who interrupted anti-tuberculosis treatment for >2 months were classified as defaulters. RESULTS: 1,141 defaulters and 1,189 non-defaulters were included. The median duration of treatment prior to default was 81 days (25%–75% interquartile range 44–117 days) and documented retrieval efforts after treatment interruption were inadequate. Defaulters were more likely to have been male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–1.7), have previously defaulted anti-tuberculosis treatment (aOR 1.3 95%CI 1.1–1.6], have previous treatment from non-RNTCP providers (AOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0–1.6], or have public health facility-based treatment observation (aOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1–1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Amongst the large number of re-treatment patients in India, default occurs early and often. Improved pre-treatment counseling and community-based treatment provision may reduce default rates. Efforts to retrieve treatment interrupters prior to default require strengthening.
format Text
id pubmed-2810342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28103422010-01-29 Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 Jha, Ugra Mohan Satyanarayana, Srinath Dewan, Puneet K. Chadha, Sarabjit Wares, Fraser Sahu, Suvanand Gupta, Devesh Chauhan, L. S. PLoS One Research Article SETTING: Under India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), >15% of previously-treated patients in the reported 2006 patient cohort defaulted from anti-tuberculosis treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing, characteristics, and risk factors for default amongst re-treatment TB patients. METHODOLOGY: For this case-control study, in 90 randomly-selected programme units treatment records were abstracted from all 2006 defaulters from the RNTCP re-treatment regimen (cases), with one consecutively-selected non-defaulter per case. Patients who interrupted anti-tuberculosis treatment for >2 months were classified as defaulters. RESULTS: 1,141 defaulters and 1,189 non-defaulters were included. The median duration of treatment prior to default was 81 days (25%–75% interquartile range 44–117 days) and documented retrieval efforts after treatment interruption were inadequate. Defaulters were more likely to have been male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–1.7), have previously defaulted anti-tuberculosis treatment (aOR 1.3 95%CI 1.1–1.6], have previous treatment from non-RNTCP providers (AOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0–1.6], or have public health facility-based treatment observation (aOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1–1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Amongst the large number of re-treatment patients in India, default occurs early and often. Improved pre-treatment counseling and community-based treatment provision may reduce default rates. Efforts to retrieve treatment interrupters prior to default require strengthening. Public Library of Science 2010-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2810342/ /pubmed/20111727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008873 Text en Jha et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jha, Ugra Mohan
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dewan, Puneet K.
Chadha, Sarabjit
Wares, Fraser
Sahu, Suvanand
Gupta, Devesh
Chauhan, L. S.
Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006
title Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006
title_full Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006
title_short Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006
title_sort risk factors for treatment default among re-treatment tuberculosis patients in india, 2006
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20111727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008873
work_keys_str_mv AT jhaugramohan riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006
AT satyanarayanasrinath riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006
AT dewanpuneetk riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006
AT chadhasarabjit riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006
AT waresfraser riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006
AT sahusuvanand riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006
AT guptadevesh riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006
AT chauhanls riskfactorsfortreatmentdefaultamongretreatmenttuberculosispatientsinindia2006