Cargando…

Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?

1. There is growing concern about the evolutionary consequences of human harvesting on phenotypic trait quality in wild populations. Undesirable consequences are especially likely with trophy hunting because of its strong bias for specific phenotypic trait values, such as large antlers in cervids an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mysterud, Atle, Bischof, Richard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19840171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01621.x
_version_ 1782176681845325824
author Mysterud, Atle
Bischof, Richard
author_facet Mysterud, Atle
Bischof, Richard
author_sort Mysterud, Atle
collection PubMed
description 1. There is growing concern about the evolutionary consequences of human harvesting on phenotypic trait quality in wild populations. Undesirable consequences are especially likely with trophy hunting because of its strong bias for specific phenotypic trait values, such as large antlers in cervids and horns in bovids. Selective hunting can cause a decline in a trophy trait over time if it is heritable, thereby reducing the long-term sustainability of the activity itself. 2. How can we build a sustainable trophy hunting tradition without the negative trait-altering effects? We used an individual-based model to explore whether selective compensatory culling of ‘low quality’ individuals at an early life stage can facilitate sustainability, as suggested by information from managed game populations in eastern and central Europe. Our model was rooted in empirical data on red deer, where heritability of sexual ornaments has been confirmed and phenotypic quality can be assessed by antler size in individuals as young as 1 year. 3. Simulations showed that targeted culling of low-quality yearlings could counter the selective effects of trophy hunting on the distribution of the affected trait (e.g. antler or horn size) in prime-aged individuals. Assumptions of trait heritability and young-to-adult correlation were essential for compensation, but the model proved robust to various other assumptions and changes to input parameters. The simulation approach allowed us to verify responses as evolutionary changes in trait values rather than short-term consequences of altered age structure, density and viability selection. 4. We conclude that evolutionarily enlightened management may accommodate trophy hunting. This has far reaching implications as income from trophy hunting is often channelled into local conservation efforts and rural economies. As an essential follow-up, we recommend an analysis of the effects of trophy hunting in conjunction with compensatory culling on the phenotypic and underlying genetic variance of the trophy trait.
format Text
id pubmed-2810430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28104302010-01-26 Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting? Mysterud, Atle Bischof, Richard J Anim Ecol Evolutionary ecology 1. There is growing concern about the evolutionary consequences of human harvesting on phenotypic trait quality in wild populations. Undesirable consequences are especially likely with trophy hunting because of its strong bias for specific phenotypic trait values, such as large antlers in cervids and horns in bovids. Selective hunting can cause a decline in a trophy trait over time if it is heritable, thereby reducing the long-term sustainability of the activity itself. 2. How can we build a sustainable trophy hunting tradition without the negative trait-altering effects? We used an individual-based model to explore whether selective compensatory culling of ‘low quality’ individuals at an early life stage can facilitate sustainability, as suggested by information from managed game populations in eastern and central Europe. Our model was rooted in empirical data on red deer, where heritability of sexual ornaments has been confirmed and phenotypic quality can be assessed by antler size in individuals as young as 1 year. 3. Simulations showed that targeted culling of low-quality yearlings could counter the selective effects of trophy hunting on the distribution of the affected trait (e.g. antler or horn size) in prime-aged individuals. Assumptions of trait heritability and young-to-adult correlation were essential for compensation, but the model proved robust to various other assumptions and changes to input parameters. The simulation approach allowed us to verify responses as evolutionary changes in trait values rather than short-term consequences of altered age structure, density and viability selection. 4. We conclude that evolutionarily enlightened management may accommodate trophy hunting. This has far reaching implications as income from trophy hunting is often channelled into local conservation efforts and rural economies. As an essential follow-up, we recommend an analysis of the effects of trophy hunting in conjunction with compensatory culling on the phenotypic and underlying genetic variance of the trophy trait. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2810430/ /pubmed/19840171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01621.x Text en Journal compilation © 2010 British Ecological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Evolutionary ecology
Mysterud, Atle
Bischof, Richard
Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?
title Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?
title_full Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?
title_fullStr Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?
title_full_unstemmed Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?
title_short Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?
title_sort can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?
topic Evolutionary ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19840171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01621.x
work_keys_str_mv AT mysterudatle cancompensatorycullingoffsetundesirableevolutionaryconsequencesoftrophyhunting
AT bischofrichard cancompensatorycullingoffsetundesirableevolutionaryconsequencesoftrophyhunting