Cargando…

Exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study

Aim: The Helping Evaluate Exenatide in overweight patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study was designed to examine whether the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, exenatide, could improve HbA1c (≤7.4%) with minimal weight gain (≤1 kg) compared with insulin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, M J, Donnelly, R, Barnett, A H, Jones, S, Nicolay, C, Kilcoyne, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19930005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01154.x
_version_ 1782176685155680256
author Davies, M J
Donnelly, R
Barnett, A H
Jones, S
Nicolay, C
Kilcoyne, A
author_facet Davies, M J
Donnelly, R
Barnett, A H
Jones, S
Nicolay, C
Kilcoyne, A
author_sort Davies, M J
collection PubMed
description Aim: The Helping Evaluate Exenatide in overweight patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study was designed to examine whether the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, exenatide, could improve HbA1c (≤7.4%) with minimal weight gain (≤1 kg) compared with insulin glargine. Methods: Patients [body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m(2)] with elevated cardiovascular risk and type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on two or three oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) were randomized to add-on exenatide 5–10 μg b.i.d. (n = 118) or insulin glargine o.d. (titrated to target fasting plasma glucose ≤5.6 mmol/l; n = 117) for 26 weeks. Results: The study population had baseline mean (s.d.) age of 56.5 (9.1) years and BMI of 34.1 (5.3) kg/m(2), and 58.5% of patients were taking two OADs. Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.65 (0.68)% in the exenatide group and 8.48 (0.66)% in the insulin glargine group. The proportions of patients achieving the composite endpoint of HbA1c ≤7.4% with weight gain ≤1 kg were 53.4% for the exenatide group and 19.8% for the insulin glargine group (p < 0.001 for exenatide vs. insulin glargine). Exenatide and insulin glargine did not demonstrate a significant difference in HbA1c improvements [least square (LS) mean [s.e.m.]: −1.25 [0.09]% and −1.26 [0.09]% respectively; p = 0.924], but had divergent effects on body weight (−2.73 [0.31] vs. +2.98 [0.31] kg respectively, p < 0.001) after 26 weeks. There were more treatment-related adverse events with exenatide but a lower incidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia, with no differences in overall or severe hypoglycaemia. Conclusions: Additional treatment with exenatide resulted in significantly more overweight and obese patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk and type 2 diabetes achieving better glycaemic control with minimal weight gain compared with insulin glargine.
format Text
id pubmed-2810445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28104452010-01-26 Exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study Davies, M J Donnelly, R Barnett, A H Jones, S Nicolay, C Kilcoyne, A Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles Aim: The Helping Evaluate Exenatide in overweight patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study was designed to examine whether the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, exenatide, could improve HbA1c (≤7.4%) with minimal weight gain (≤1 kg) compared with insulin glargine. Methods: Patients [body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m(2)] with elevated cardiovascular risk and type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on two or three oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) were randomized to add-on exenatide 5–10 μg b.i.d. (n = 118) or insulin glargine o.d. (titrated to target fasting plasma glucose ≤5.6 mmol/l; n = 117) for 26 weeks. Results: The study population had baseline mean (s.d.) age of 56.5 (9.1) years and BMI of 34.1 (5.3) kg/m(2), and 58.5% of patients were taking two OADs. Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.65 (0.68)% in the exenatide group and 8.48 (0.66)% in the insulin glargine group. The proportions of patients achieving the composite endpoint of HbA1c ≤7.4% with weight gain ≤1 kg were 53.4% for the exenatide group and 19.8% for the insulin glargine group (p < 0.001 for exenatide vs. insulin glargine). Exenatide and insulin glargine did not demonstrate a significant difference in HbA1c improvements [least square (LS) mean [s.e.m.]: −1.25 [0.09]% and −1.26 [0.09]% respectively; p = 0.924], but had divergent effects on body weight (−2.73 [0.31] vs. +2.98 [0.31] kg respectively, p < 0.001) after 26 weeks. There were more treatment-related adverse events with exenatide but a lower incidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia, with no differences in overall or severe hypoglycaemia. Conclusions: Additional treatment with exenatide resulted in significantly more overweight and obese patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk and type 2 diabetes achieving better glycaemic control with minimal weight gain compared with insulin glargine. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2810445/ /pubmed/19930005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01154.x Text en © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Davies, M J
Donnelly, R
Barnett, A H
Jones, S
Nicolay, C
Kilcoyne, A
Exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study
title Exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study
title_full Exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study
title_fullStr Exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study
title_full_unstemmed Exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study
title_short Exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long-Acting insulin (HEELA) study
title_sort exenatide compared with long-acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the helping evaluate exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with long-acting insulin (heela) study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19930005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01154.x
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesmj exenatidecomparedwithlongactinginsulintoachieveglycaemiccontrolwithminimalweightgaininpatientswithtype2diabetesresultsofthehelpingevaluateexenatideinpatientswithdiabetescomparedwithlongactinginsulinheelastudy
AT donnellyr exenatidecomparedwithlongactinginsulintoachieveglycaemiccontrolwithminimalweightgaininpatientswithtype2diabetesresultsofthehelpingevaluateexenatideinpatientswithdiabetescomparedwithlongactinginsulinheelastudy
AT barnettah exenatidecomparedwithlongactinginsulintoachieveglycaemiccontrolwithminimalweightgaininpatientswithtype2diabetesresultsofthehelpingevaluateexenatideinpatientswithdiabetescomparedwithlongactinginsulinheelastudy
AT joness exenatidecomparedwithlongactinginsulintoachieveglycaemiccontrolwithminimalweightgaininpatientswithtype2diabetesresultsofthehelpingevaluateexenatideinpatientswithdiabetescomparedwithlongactinginsulinheelastudy
AT nicolayc exenatidecomparedwithlongactinginsulintoachieveglycaemiccontrolwithminimalweightgaininpatientswithtype2diabetesresultsofthehelpingevaluateexenatideinpatientswithdiabetescomparedwithlongactinginsulinheelastudy
AT kilcoynea exenatidecomparedwithlongactinginsulintoachieveglycaemiccontrolwithminimalweightgaininpatientswithtype2diabetesresultsofthehelpingevaluateexenatideinpatientswithdiabetescomparedwithlongactinginsulinheelastudy