Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is one of the most prominent health problems in the world, causing 1.75 million deaths each year. Rapid clinical diagnosis is important in patients who have co-morbidities such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Direct microscopy has low sensitivity and culture...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20043842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-216 |
_version_ | 1782176728566726656 |
---|---|
author | Scherer, Luciene C Sperhacke, Rosa D Ruffino-Netto, Antonio Rossetti, Maria LR Vater, Claudia Klatser, Paul Kritski, Afrânio L |
author_facet | Scherer, Luciene C Sperhacke, Rosa D Ruffino-Netto, Antonio Rossetti, Maria LR Vater, Claudia Klatser, Paul Kritski, Afrânio L |
author_sort | Scherer, Luciene C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is one of the most prominent health problems in the world, causing 1.75 million deaths each year. Rapid clinical diagnosis is important in patients who have co-morbidities such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Direct microscopy has low sensitivity and culture takes 3 to 6 weeks [1-3]. Therefore, new tools for TB diagnosis are necessary, especially in health settings with a high prevalence of HIV/TB co-infection. METHODS: In a public reference TB/HIV hospital in Brazil, we compared the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for diagnosis of pulmonary TB: Acid fast bacilli smear microscopy by Ziehl-Neelsen staining (AFB smear) plus culture and AFB smear plus colorimetric test (PCR dot-blot). From May 2003 to May 2004, sputum was collected consecutively from PTB suspects attending the Parthenon Reference Hospital. Sputum samples were examined by AFB smear, culture, and PCR dot-blot. The gold standard was a positive culture combined with the definition of clinical PTB. Cost analysis included health services and patient costs. RESULTS: The AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot require the lowest laboratory investment for equipment (US$ 20,000). The total screening costs are 3.8 times for AFB smear plus culture versus for AFB smear plus PCR dot blot costs (US$ 5,635,760 versus US$ 1,498, 660). Costs per correctly diagnosed case were US$ 50,773 and US$ 13,749 for AFB smear plus culture and AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot, respectively. AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot was more cost-effective than AFB smear plus culture, when the cost of treating all correctly diagnosed cases was considered. The cost of returning patients, which are not treated due to a negative result, to the health service, was higher in AFB smear plus culture than for AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot, US$ 374,778,045 and US$ 110,849,055, respectively. CONCLUSION: AFB smear associated with PCR dot-blot associated has the potential to be a cost-effective tool in the fight against PTB for patients attended in the TB/HIV reference hospital. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2811112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28111122010-01-26 Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis Scherer, Luciene C Sperhacke, Rosa D Ruffino-Netto, Antonio Rossetti, Maria LR Vater, Claudia Klatser, Paul Kritski, Afrânio L BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is one of the most prominent health problems in the world, causing 1.75 million deaths each year. Rapid clinical diagnosis is important in patients who have co-morbidities such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Direct microscopy has low sensitivity and culture takes 3 to 6 weeks [1-3]. Therefore, new tools for TB diagnosis are necessary, especially in health settings with a high prevalence of HIV/TB co-infection. METHODS: In a public reference TB/HIV hospital in Brazil, we compared the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for diagnosis of pulmonary TB: Acid fast bacilli smear microscopy by Ziehl-Neelsen staining (AFB smear) plus culture and AFB smear plus colorimetric test (PCR dot-blot). From May 2003 to May 2004, sputum was collected consecutively from PTB suspects attending the Parthenon Reference Hospital. Sputum samples were examined by AFB smear, culture, and PCR dot-blot. The gold standard was a positive culture combined with the definition of clinical PTB. Cost analysis included health services and patient costs. RESULTS: The AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot require the lowest laboratory investment for equipment (US$ 20,000). The total screening costs are 3.8 times for AFB smear plus culture versus for AFB smear plus PCR dot blot costs (US$ 5,635,760 versus US$ 1,498, 660). Costs per correctly diagnosed case were US$ 50,773 and US$ 13,749 for AFB smear plus culture and AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot, respectively. AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot was more cost-effective than AFB smear plus culture, when the cost of treating all correctly diagnosed cases was considered. The cost of returning patients, which are not treated due to a negative result, to the health service, was higher in AFB smear plus culture than for AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot, US$ 374,778,045 and US$ 110,849,055, respectively. CONCLUSION: AFB smear associated with PCR dot-blot associated has the potential to be a cost-effective tool in the fight against PTB for patients attended in the TB/HIV reference hospital. BioMed Central 2009-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2811112/ /pubmed/20043842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-216 Text en Copyright ©2009 Scherer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Scherer, Luciene C Sperhacke, Rosa D Ruffino-Netto, Antonio Rossetti, Maria LR Vater, Claudia Klatser, Paul Kritski, Afrânio L Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of pcr for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20043842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schererlucienec costeffectivenessanalysisofpcrfortherapiddiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosis AT sperhackerosad costeffectivenessanalysisofpcrfortherapiddiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosis AT ruffinonettoantonio costeffectivenessanalysisofpcrfortherapiddiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosis AT rossettimarialr costeffectivenessanalysisofpcrfortherapiddiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosis AT vaterclaudia costeffectivenessanalysisofpcrfortherapiddiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosis AT klatserpaul costeffectivenessanalysisofpcrfortherapiddiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosis AT kritskiafraniol costeffectivenessanalysisofpcrfortherapiddiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosis |