Cargando…

Laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets

Within the integrin family of cell adhesion receptors, integrins α3β1, α6β1, α6β4 and α7β1 make up a laminin-binding subfamily. The literature is divided on the role of these laminin-binding integrins in metastasis, with different studies indicating either pro- or antimetastatic functions. The oppos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stipp, Christopher S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1462399409001355
_version_ 1782176761228820480
author Stipp, Christopher S.
author_facet Stipp, Christopher S.
author_sort Stipp, Christopher S.
collection PubMed
description Within the integrin family of cell adhesion receptors, integrins α3β1, α6β1, α6β4 and α7β1 make up a laminin-binding subfamily. The literature is divided on the role of these laminin-binding integrins in metastasis, with different studies indicating either pro- or antimetastatic functions. The opposing roles of the laminin-binding integrins in different settings might derive in part from their unusually robust associations with tetraspanin proteins. Tetraspanins organise integrins into multiprotein complexes within discrete plasma membrane domains termed tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs). TEM association is crucial to the strikingly rapid cell migration mediated by some of the laminin-binding integrins. However, emerging data suggest that laminin-binding integrins also promote the stability of E-cadherin-based cell–cell junctions, and that tetraspanins are essential for this function as well. Thus, TEM association endows the laminin-binding integrins with both pro-invasive functions (rapid migration) and anti-invasive functions (stable cell junctions), and the composition of TEMs in different cell types might help determine the balance between these opposing activities. Unravelling the tetraspanin control mechanisms that regulate laminin-binding integrins will help to define the settings where inhibiting the function of these integrins would be helpful rather than harmful, and may create opportunities to modulate integrin activity in more sophisticated ways than simple functional blockade.
format Text
id pubmed-2811424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28114242010-03-02 Laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets Stipp, Christopher S. Expert Rev Mol Med Review Article Within the integrin family of cell adhesion receptors, integrins α3β1, α6β1, α6β4 and α7β1 make up a laminin-binding subfamily. The literature is divided on the role of these laminin-binding integrins in metastasis, with different studies indicating either pro- or antimetastatic functions. The opposing roles of the laminin-binding integrins in different settings might derive in part from their unusually robust associations with tetraspanin proteins. Tetraspanins organise integrins into multiprotein complexes within discrete plasma membrane domains termed tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs). TEM association is crucial to the strikingly rapid cell migration mediated by some of the laminin-binding integrins. However, emerging data suggest that laminin-binding integrins also promote the stability of E-cadherin-based cell–cell junctions, and that tetraspanins are essential for this function as well. Thus, TEM association endows the laminin-binding integrins with both pro-invasive functions (rapid migration) and anti-invasive functions (stable cell junctions), and the composition of TEMs in different cell types might help determine the balance between these opposing activities. Unravelling the tetraspanin control mechanisms that regulate laminin-binding integrins will help to define the settings where inhibiting the function of these integrins would be helpful rather than harmful, and may create opportunities to modulate integrin activity in more sophisticated ways than simple functional blockade. Cambridge University Press 2010-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2811424/ /pubmed/20078909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1462399409001355 Text en Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010. Re-use permitted under a Creative Commons Licence–by-nc-sa. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ Re-use permitted under a Creative Commons Licence–by-nc-sa.
spellingShingle Review Article
Stipp, Christopher S.
Laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets
title Laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets
title_full Laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets
title_fullStr Laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets
title_full_unstemmed Laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets
title_short Laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets
title_sort laminin-binding integrins and their tetraspanin partners as potential antimetastatic targets
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1462399409001355
work_keys_str_mv AT stippchristophers lamininbindingintegrinsandtheirtetraspaninpartnersaspotentialantimetastatictargets