Cargando…

Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device

INTRODUCTION: Passive leg raising (PLR) is a simple reversible maneuver that mimics rapid fluid loading and increases cardiac preload. The effects of this endogenous volume expansion on stroke volume enable the testing of fluid responsiveness with accuracy in spontaneously breathing patients. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biais, Matthieu, Vidil, Lionel, Sarrabay, Philippe, Cottenceau, Vincent, Revel, Philippe, Sztark, François
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19968880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8195
_version_ 1782176809185443840
author Biais, Matthieu
Vidil, Lionel
Sarrabay, Philippe
Cottenceau, Vincent
Revel, Philippe
Sztark, François
author_facet Biais, Matthieu
Vidil, Lionel
Sarrabay, Philippe
Cottenceau, Vincent
Revel, Philippe
Sztark, François
author_sort Biais, Matthieu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Passive leg raising (PLR) is a simple reversible maneuver that mimics rapid fluid loading and increases cardiac preload. The effects of this endogenous volume expansion on stroke volume enable the testing of fluid responsiveness with accuracy in spontaneously breathing patients. However, this maneuver requires the determination of stroke volume with a fast-response device, because the hemodynamic changes may be transient. The Vigileo™ monitor (Vigileo™; Flotrac™; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) analyzes systemic arterial pressure wave and allows continuous stroke volume monitoring. The aims of this study were (i) to compare changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising measured with the Vigileo™ device and with transthoracic echocardiography and (ii) to compare their ability to predict fluid responsiveness. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with spontaneous breathing activity and considered for volume expansion were included. Measurements of stroke volume were obtained with transthoracic echocardiography (SV-TTE) and with the Vigileo™ (SV-Flotrac) in a semi-recumbent position, during PLR and after volume expansion (500 ml saline). Patients were responders to volume expansion if SV-TTE increased ≥ 15%. RESULTS: Four patients were excluded. No patients received vasoactive drugs. Seven patients presented septic hypovolemia. PLR-induced changes in SV-TTE and in SV-Flotrac were correlated (r(2 )= 0.56, P < 0.0001). An increase in SV-TTE ≥ 13% during PLR was predictive of response to volume expansion with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. An increase in SV-Flotrac ≥16% during PLR was predictive of response to volume expansion with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 90%. There was no difference between the area under the ROC curve for PLR-induced changes in SV-TTE (AUC = 0.96 ± 0.03) or SV-Flotrac (AUC = 0.92 ± 0.05). Volume expansion-induced changes in SV-TTE correlated with volume expansion-induced changes in SV-Flotrac (r(2 )= 0.77, P < 0.0001). In all patients, the highest plateau value of SV-TTE recorded during PLR was obtained within the first 90 s following leg elevation, whereas it was 120 s for SV-Flotrac. CONCLUSIONS: PLR-induced changes in SV-Flotrac are able to predict the response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients without vasoactive support.
format Text
id pubmed-2811910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28119102010-01-28 Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device Biais, Matthieu Vidil, Lionel Sarrabay, Philippe Cottenceau, Vincent Revel, Philippe Sztark, François Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Passive leg raising (PLR) is a simple reversible maneuver that mimics rapid fluid loading and increases cardiac preload. The effects of this endogenous volume expansion on stroke volume enable the testing of fluid responsiveness with accuracy in spontaneously breathing patients. However, this maneuver requires the determination of stroke volume with a fast-response device, because the hemodynamic changes may be transient. The Vigileo™ monitor (Vigileo™; Flotrac™; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) analyzes systemic arterial pressure wave and allows continuous stroke volume monitoring. The aims of this study were (i) to compare changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising measured with the Vigileo™ device and with transthoracic echocardiography and (ii) to compare their ability to predict fluid responsiveness. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with spontaneous breathing activity and considered for volume expansion were included. Measurements of stroke volume were obtained with transthoracic echocardiography (SV-TTE) and with the Vigileo™ (SV-Flotrac) in a semi-recumbent position, during PLR and after volume expansion (500 ml saline). Patients were responders to volume expansion if SV-TTE increased ≥ 15%. RESULTS: Four patients were excluded. No patients received vasoactive drugs. Seven patients presented septic hypovolemia. PLR-induced changes in SV-TTE and in SV-Flotrac were correlated (r(2 )= 0.56, P < 0.0001). An increase in SV-TTE ≥ 13% during PLR was predictive of response to volume expansion with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. An increase in SV-Flotrac ≥16% during PLR was predictive of response to volume expansion with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 90%. There was no difference between the area under the ROC curve for PLR-induced changes in SV-TTE (AUC = 0.96 ± 0.03) or SV-Flotrac (AUC = 0.92 ± 0.05). Volume expansion-induced changes in SV-TTE correlated with volume expansion-induced changes in SV-Flotrac (r(2 )= 0.77, P < 0.0001). In all patients, the highest plateau value of SV-TTE recorded during PLR was obtained within the first 90 s following leg elevation, whereas it was 120 s for SV-Flotrac. CONCLUSIONS: PLR-induced changes in SV-Flotrac are able to predict the response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients without vasoactive support. BioMed Central 2009 2009-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2811910/ /pubmed/19968880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8195 Text en Copyright ©2009 Biais et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Biais, Matthieu
Vidil, Lionel
Sarrabay, Philippe
Cottenceau, Vincent
Revel, Philippe
Sztark, François
Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device
title Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device
title_full Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device
title_fullStr Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device
title_full_unstemmed Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device
title_short Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device
title_sort changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and vigileo™/flotrac™ device
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19968880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8195
work_keys_str_mv AT biaismatthieu changesinstrokevolumeinducedbypassivelegraisinginspontaneouslybreathingpatientscomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandvigileoflotracdevice
AT vidillionel changesinstrokevolumeinducedbypassivelegraisinginspontaneouslybreathingpatientscomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandvigileoflotracdevice
AT sarrabayphilippe changesinstrokevolumeinducedbypassivelegraisinginspontaneouslybreathingpatientscomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandvigileoflotracdevice
AT cottenceauvincent changesinstrokevolumeinducedbypassivelegraisinginspontaneouslybreathingpatientscomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandvigileoflotracdevice
AT revelphilippe changesinstrokevolumeinducedbypassivelegraisinginspontaneouslybreathingpatientscomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandvigileoflotracdevice
AT sztarkfrancois changesinstrokevolumeinducedbypassivelegraisinginspontaneouslybreathingpatientscomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandvigileoflotracdevice