Cargando…

Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill surgical patients frequently develop intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) leading to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) with subsequent high mortality. We compared two temporary abdominal closure systems (Bogota bag and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device) in intra-abdo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batacchi, Stefano, Matano, Stefania, Nella, Alessandra, Zagli, Giovanni, Bonizzoli, Manuela, Pasquini, Andrea, Anichini, Valentina, Tucci, Valentina, Manca, Giuseppe, Ban, Kevin, Valeri, Andrea, Peris, Adriano
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19961614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8193
_version_ 1782176816247603200
author Batacchi, Stefano
Matano, Stefania
Nella, Alessandra
Zagli, Giovanni
Bonizzoli, Manuela
Pasquini, Andrea
Anichini, Valentina
Tucci, Valentina
Manca, Giuseppe
Ban, Kevin
Valeri, Andrea
Peris, Adriano
author_facet Batacchi, Stefano
Matano, Stefania
Nella, Alessandra
Zagli, Giovanni
Bonizzoli, Manuela
Pasquini, Andrea
Anichini, Valentina
Tucci, Valentina
Manca, Giuseppe
Ban, Kevin
Valeri, Andrea
Peris, Adriano
author_sort Batacchi, Stefano
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Critically ill surgical patients frequently develop intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) leading to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) with subsequent high mortality. We compared two temporary abdominal closure systems (Bogota bag and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device) in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) control. METHODS: This prospective study with a historical control included 66 patients admitted to a medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care referral center (Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy) from January 2006 to April 2009. The control group included patients consecutively treated with the Bogota bag (Jan 2006-Oct 2007), whereas the prospective group was comprised of patients treated with a VAC. All patients underwent abdominal decompressive surgery. Groups were compared based upon their IAP, SOFA score, serial arterial lactates, the duration of having their abdomen open, the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) along with length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality. Data were collected from the time of abdominal decompression until the end of pressure monitoring. RESULTS: The Bogota and VAC groups were similar with regards to demography, admission diagnosis, severity of illness, and IAH grading. The VAC system was more effective in controlling IAP (P < 0.01) and normalizing serum lactates (P < 0.001) as compared to the Bogota bag during the first 24 hours after surgical decompression. There was no significant difference between the SOFA scores. When compared to the Bogota, the VAC group had a faster abdominal closure time (4.4 vs 6.6 days, P = 0.025), shorter duration of MV (7.1 vs 9.9 days, P = 0.039), decreased ICU length of stay (LOS) (13.3 vs 19.2 days, P = 0.024) and hospital LOS (28.5 vs 34.9 days; P = 0.019). Mortality rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abdominal compartment syndrome who were treated with VAC decompression had a faster abdominal closure rate and earlier discharge from the ICU as compared to similar patients treated with the Bogota bag.
format Text
id pubmed-2811940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28119402010-01-28 Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures Batacchi, Stefano Matano, Stefania Nella, Alessandra Zagli, Giovanni Bonizzoli, Manuela Pasquini, Andrea Anichini, Valentina Tucci, Valentina Manca, Giuseppe Ban, Kevin Valeri, Andrea Peris, Adriano Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Critically ill surgical patients frequently develop intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) leading to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) with subsequent high mortality. We compared two temporary abdominal closure systems (Bogota bag and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device) in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) control. METHODS: This prospective study with a historical control included 66 patients admitted to a medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care referral center (Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy) from January 2006 to April 2009. The control group included patients consecutively treated with the Bogota bag (Jan 2006-Oct 2007), whereas the prospective group was comprised of patients treated with a VAC. All patients underwent abdominal decompressive surgery. Groups were compared based upon their IAP, SOFA score, serial arterial lactates, the duration of having their abdomen open, the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) along with length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality. Data were collected from the time of abdominal decompression until the end of pressure monitoring. RESULTS: The Bogota and VAC groups were similar with regards to demography, admission diagnosis, severity of illness, and IAH grading. The VAC system was more effective in controlling IAP (P < 0.01) and normalizing serum lactates (P < 0.001) as compared to the Bogota bag during the first 24 hours after surgical decompression. There was no significant difference between the SOFA scores. When compared to the Bogota, the VAC group had a faster abdominal closure time (4.4 vs 6.6 days, P = 0.025), shorter duration of MV (7.1 vs 9.9 days, P = 0.039), decreased ICU length of stay (LOS) (13.3 vs 19.2 days, P = 0.024) and hospital LOS (28.5 vs 34.9 days; P = 0.019). Mortality rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abdominal compartment syndrome who were treated with VAC decompression had a faster abdominal closure rate and earlier discharge from the ICU as compared to similar patients treated with the Bogota bag. BioMed Central 2009 2009-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2811940/ /pubmed/19961614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8193 Text en Copyright ©2009 Batacchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Batacchi, Stefano
Matano, Stefania
Nella, Alessandra
Zagli, Giovanni
Bonizzoli, Manuela
Pasquini, Andrea
Anichini, Valentina
Tucci, Valentina
Manca, Giuseppe
Ban, Kevin
Valeri, Andrea
Peris, Adriano
Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures
title Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures
title_full Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures
title_fullStr Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures
title_full_unstemmed Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures
title_short Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures
title_sort vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19961614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8193
work_keys_str_mv AT batacchistefano vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT matanostefania vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT nellaalessandra vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT zagligiovanni vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT bonizzolimanuela vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT pasquiniandrea vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT anichinivalentina vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT tuccivalentina vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT mancagiuseppe vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT bankevin vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT valeriandrea vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures
AT perisadriano vacuumassistedclosuredeviceenhancesrecoveryofcriticallyillpatientsfollowingemergencysurgicalprocedures