Cargando…

On the Genetic Interpretation of Disease Data

BACKGROUND: The understanding of host genetic variation in disease resistance increasingly requires the use of field data to obtain sufficient numbers of phenotypes. We introduce concepts necessary for a genetic interpretation of field disease data, for diseases caused by microparasites such as bact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bishop, Stephen C., Woolliams, John A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2812510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20126627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008940
_version_ 1782176836247093248
author Bishop, Stephen C.
Woolliams, John A.
author_facet Bishop, Stephen C.
Woolliams, John A.
author_sort Bishop, Stephen C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The understanding of host genetic variation in disease resistance increasingly requires the use of field data to obtain sufficient numbers of phenotypes. We introduce concepts necessary for a genetic interpretation of field disease data, for diseases caused by microparasites such as bacteria or viruses. Our focus is on variance component estimation and we introduce epidemiological concepts to quantitative genetics. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have derived simple deterministic formulae to predict the impacts of incomplete exposure to infection, or imperfect diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity on heritabilities for disease resistance. We show that these factors all reduce the estimable heritabilities. The impacts of incomplete exposure depend on disease prevalence but are relatively linear with the exposure probability. For prevalences less than 0.5, imperfect diagnostic test sensitivity results in a small underestimation of heritability, whereas imperfect specificity leads to a much greater underestimation, with the impact increasing as prevalence declines. These impacts are reversed for prevalences greater than 0.5. Incomplete data recording in which infected or diseased individuals are not observed, e.g. data recording for too short a period, has impacts analogous to imperfect sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results help to explain the often low disease resistance heritabilities observed under field conditions. They also demonstrate that incomplete exposure to infection, or suboptimal diagnoses, are not fatal flaws for demonstrating host genetic differences in resistance, they merely reduce the power of datasets. Lastly, they provide a tool for inferring the true extent of genetic variation in disease resistance given knowledge of the disease biology.
format Text
id pubmed-2812510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28125102010-02-02 On the Genetic Interpretation of Disease Data Bishop, Stephen C. Woolliams, John A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The understanding of host genetic variation in disease resistance increasingly requires the use of field data to obtain sufficient numbers of phenotypes. We introduce concepts necessary for a genetic interpretation of field disease data, for diseases caused by microparasites such as bacteria or viruses. Our focus is on variance component estimation and we introduce epidemiological concepts to quantitative genetics. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have derived simple deterministic formulae to predict the impacts of incomplete exposure to infection, or imperfect diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity on heritabilities for disease resistance. We show that these factors all reduce the estimable heritabilities. The impacts of incomplete exposure depend on disease prevalence but are relatively linear with the exposure probability. For prevalences less than 0.5, imperfect diagnostic test sensitivity results in a small underestimation of heritability, whereas imperfect specificity leads to a much greater underestimation, with the impact increasing as prevalence declines. These impacts are reversed for prevalences greater than 0.5. Incomplete data recording in which infected or diseased individuals are not observed, e.g. data recording for too short a period, has impacts analogous to imperfect sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results help to explain the often low disease resistance heritabilities observed under field conditions. They also demonstrate that incomplete exposure to infection, or suboptimal diagnoses, are not fatal flaws for demonstrating host genetic differences in resistance, they merely reduce the power of datasets. Lastly, they provide a tool for inferring the true extent of genetic variation in disease resistance given knowledge of the disease biology. Public Library of Science 2010-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2812510/ /pubmed/20126627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008940 Text en Bishop, Woolliams. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bishop, Stephen C.
Woolliams, John A.
On the Genetic Interpretation of Disease Data
title On the Genetic Interpretation of Disease Data
title_full On the Genetic Interpretation of Disease Data
title_fullStr On the Genetic Interpretation of Disease Data
title_full_unstemmed On the Genetic Interpretation of Disease Data
title_short On the Genetic Interpretation of Disease Data
title_sort on the genetic interpretation of disease data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2812510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20126627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008940
work_keys_str_mv AT bishopstephenc onthegeneticinterpretationofdiseasedata
AT woolliamsjohna onthegeneticinterpretationofdiseasedata