Cargando…
Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods
The study aimed at evaluating the depth of cure and knoop hardness of a microfine-hybrid composite resin that was photo-activated using different methods. A bipartite brass mold was filled with composite resin and photo-activation was performed using four methods: (1) Intermittent method using quart...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20142889 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.44055 |
_version_ | 1782176883607076864 |
---|---|
author | Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Malhan, Babita |
author_facet | Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Malhan, Babita |
author_sort | Hegde, Mithra N |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study aimed at evaluating the depth of cure and knoop hardness of a microfine-hybrid composite resin that was photo-activated using different methods. A bipartite brass mold was filled with composite resin and photo-activation was performed using four methods: (1) Intermittent method using quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) light curing unit (LCU) (2) Continuous method (QTH) (3) Exponential method (QTH) (4) Continuous method using light-emitting diode (LED). Depth of cure was measured at the unexposed bottom surface of the specimen using microtester as a penetrometer. The surfaces exposed to light were subjected to knoop hardness testing, using a digital microhardness tester. Knoop hardness measurements were obtained at the top surface and at depths of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm. The data was analyzed using anova and Tukey's test (5%). Results showed that the depth of cure was higher with the intermittent method (QTH), followed by the continuous method (QTH), the exponential method and the continuous method (LED). At the top surface and up to 1 mm, continuous method (LED) demonstrated the highest knoop hardness number (KHN). At 2 mm and up to 5 mm, intermittent method (QTH) presented the highest KHN and continuous method (LED) showed the lowest KHN. At all depths, continuous method (QTH) showed higher KHN, as compared to the exponential method (QTH), except at 2 mm where both showed no significant difference. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2813097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28130972010-02-08 Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Malhan, Babita J Conserv Dent Original Research The study aimed at evaluating the depth of cure and knoop hardness of a microfine-hybrid composite resin that was photo-activated using different methods. A bipartite brass mold was filled with composite resin and photo-activation was performed using four methods: (1) Intermittent method using quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) light curing unit (LCU) (2) Continuous method (QTH) (3) Exponential method (QTH) (4) Continuous method using light-emitting diode (LED). Depth of cure was measured at the unexposed bottom surface of the specimen using microtester as a penetrometer. The surfaces exposed to light were subjected to knoop hardness testing, using a digital microhardness tester. Knoop hardness measurements were obtained at the top surface and at depths of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm. The data was analyzed using anova and Tukey's test (5%). Results showed that the depth of cure was higher with the intermittent method (QTH), followed by the continuous method (QTH), the exponential method and the continuous method (LED). At the top surface and up to 1 mm, continuous method (LED) demonstrated the highest knoop hardness number (KHN). At 2 mm and up to 5 mm, intermittent method (QTH) presented the highest KHN and continuous method (LED) showed the lowest KHN. At all depths, continuous method (QTH) showed higher KHN, as compared to the exponential method (QTH), except at 2 mm where both showed no significant difference. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2813097/ /pubmed/20142889 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.44055 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Malhan, Babita Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods |
title | Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods |
title_full | Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods |
title_short | Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods |
title_sort | evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20142889 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.44055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hegdemithran evaluationofdepthofcureandknoophardnessinadentalcompositephotoactivatedusingdifferentmethods AT hegdepriyadarshini evaluationofdepthofcureandknoophardnessinadentalcompositephotoactivatedusingdifferentmethods AT malhanbabita evaluationofdepthofcureandknoophardnessinadentalcompositephotoactivatedusingdifferentmethods |