Cargando…

Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods

The study aimed at evaluating the depth of cure and knoop hardness of a microfine-hybrid composite resin that was photo-activated using different methods. A bipartite brass mold was filled with composite resin and photo-activation was performed using four methods: (1) Intermittent method using quart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegde, Mithra N, Hegde, Priyadarshini, Malhan, Babita
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20142889
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.44055
_version_ 1782176883607076864
author Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Priyadarshini
Malhan, Babita
author_facet Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Priyadarshini
Malhan, Babita
author_sort Hegde, Mithra N
collection PubMed
description The study aimed at evaluating the depth of cure and knoop hardness of a microfine-hybrid composite resin that was photo-activated using different methods. A bipartite brass mold was filled with composite resin and photo-activation was performed using four methods: (1) Intermittent method using quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) light curing unit (LCU) (2) Continuous method (QTH) (3) Exponential method (QTH) (4) Continuous method using light-emitting diode (LED). Depth of cure was measured at the unexposed bottom surface of the specimen using microtester as a penetrometer. The surfaces exposed to light were subjected to knoop hardness testing, using a digital microhardness tester. Knoop hardness measurements were obtained at the top surface and at depths of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm. The data was analyzed using anova and Tukey's test (5%). Results showed that the depth of cure was higher with the intermittent method (QTH), followed by the continuous method (QTH), the exponential method and the continuous method (LED). At the top surface and up to 1 mm, continuous method (LED) demonstrated the highest knoop hardness number (KHN). At 2 mm and up to 5 mm, intermittent method (QTH) presented the highest KHN and continuous method (LED) showed the lowest KHN. At all depths, continuous method (QTH) showed higher KHN, as compared to the exponential method (QTH), except at 2 mm where both showed no significant difference.
format Text
id pubmed-2813097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28130972010-02-08 Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Malhan, Babita J Conserv Dent Original Research The study aimed at evaluating the depth of cure and knoop hardness of a microfine-hybrid composite resin that was photo-activated using different methods. A bipartite brass mold was filled with composite resin and photo-activation was performed using four methods: (1) Intermittent method using quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) light curing unit (LCU) (2) Continuous method (QTH) (3) Exponential method (QTH) (4) Continuous method using light-emitting diode (LED). Depth of cure was measured at the unexposed bottom surface of the specimen using microtester as a penetrometer. The surfaces exposed to light were subjected to knoop hardness testing, using a digital microhardness tester. Knoop hardness measurements were obtained at the top surface and at depths of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm. The data was analyzed using anova and Tukey's test (5%). Results showed that the depth of cure was higher with the intermittent method (QTH), followed by the continuous method (QTH), the exponential method and the continuous method (LED). At the top surface and up to 1 mm, continuous method (LED) demonstrated the highest knoop hardness number (KHN). At 2 mm and up to 5 mm, intermittent method (QTH) presented the highest KHN and continuous method (LED) showed the lowest KHN. At all depths, continuous method (QTH) showed higher KHN, as compared to the exponential method (QTH), except at 2 mm where both showed no significant difference. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2813097/ /pubmed/20142889 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.44055 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Priyadarshini
Malhan, Babita
Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods
title Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods
title_full Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods
title_fullStr Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods
title_short Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods
title_sort evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20142889
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.44055
work_keys_str_mv AT hegdemithran evaluationofdepthofcureandknoophardnessinadentalcompositephotoactivatedusingdifferentmethods
AT hegdepriyadarshini evaluationofdepthofcureandknoophardnessinadentalcompositephotoactivatedusingdifferentmethods
AT malhanbabita evaluationofdepthofcureandknoophardnessinadentalcompositephotoactivatedusingdifferentmethods