Cargando…

Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based quality improvement models for depression have not been fully implemented in routine primary care settings. To date, few studies have examined the organizational factors associated with depression management in real-world primary care practice. To successfully implement qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Post, Edward P, Kilbourne, Amy M, Bremer, Robert W, Solano, Francis X, Pincus, Harold Alan, Reynolds, Charles F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20043838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-84
_version_ 1782176896263389184
author Post, Edward P
Kilbourne, Amy M
Bremer, Robert W
Solano, Francis X
Pincus, Harold Alan
Reynolds, Charles F
author_facet Post, Edward P
Kilbourne, Amy M
Bremer, Robert W
Solano, Francis X
Pincus, Harold Alan
Reynolds, Charles F
author_sort Post, Edward P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based quality improvement models for depression have not been fully implemented in routine primary care settings. To date, few studies have examined the organizational factors associated with depression management in real-world primary care practice. To successfully implement quality improvement models for depression, there must be a better understanding of the relevant organizational structure and processes of the primary care setting. The objective of this study is to describe these organizational features of routine primary care practice, and the organization of depression care, using survey questions derived from an evidence-based framework. METHODS: We used this framework to implement a survey of 27 practices comprised of 49 unique offices within a large primary care practice network in western Pennsylvania. Survey questions addressed practice structure (e.g., human resources, leadership, information technology (IT) infrastructure, and external incentives) and process features (e.g., staff performance, degree of integrated depression care, and IT performance). RESULTS: The results of our survey demonstrated substantial variation across the practice network of organizational factors pertinent to implementation of evidence-based depression management. Notably, quality improvement capability and IT infrastructure were widespread, but specific application to depression care differed between practices, as did coordination and communication tasks surrounding depression treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The primary care practices in the network that we surveyed are at differing stages in their organization and implementation of evidence-based depression management. Practical surveys such as this may serve to better direct implementation of these quality improvement strategies for depression by improving understanding of the organizational barriers and facilitators that exist within both practices and practice networks. In addition, survey information can inform efforts of individual primary care practices in customizing intervention strategies to improve depression management.
format Text
id pubmed-2813228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28132282010-01-29 Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings Post, Edward P Kilbourne, Amy M Bremer, Robert W Solano, Francis X Pincus, Harold Alan Reynolds, Charles F Implement Sci Research article BACKGROUND: Evidence-based quality improvement models for depression have not been fully implemented in routine primary care settings. To date, few studies have examined the organizational factors associated with depression management in real-world primary care practice. To successfully implement quality improvement models for depression, there must be a better understanding of the relevant organizational structure and processes of the primary care setting. The objective of this study is to describe these organizational features of routine primary care practice, and the organization of depression care, using survey questions derived from an evidence-based framework. METHODS: We used this framework to implement a survey of 27 practices comprised of 49 unique offices within a large primary care practice network in western Pennsylvania. Survey questions addressed practice structure (e.g., human resources, leadership, information technology (IT) infrastructure, and external incentives) and process features (e.g., staff performance, degree of integrated depression care, and IT performance). RESULTS: The results of our survey demonstrated substantial variation across the practice network of organizational factors pertinent to implementation of evidence-based depression management. Notably, quality improvement capability and IT infrastructure were widespread, but specific application to depression care differed between practices, as did coordination and communication tasks surrounding depression treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The primary care practices in the network that we surveyed are at differing stages in their organization and implementation of evidence-based depression management. Practical surveys such as this may serve to better direct implementation of these quality improvement strategies for depression by improving understanding of the organizational barriers and facilitators that exist within both practices and practice networks. In addition, survey information can inform efforts of individual primary care practices in customizing intervention strategies to improve depression management. BioMed Central 2009-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2813228/ /pubmed/20043838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-84 Text en Copyright ©2009 Post et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Post, Edward P
Kilbourne, Amy M
Bremer, Robert W
Solano, Francis X
Pincus, Harold Alan
Reynolds, Charles F
Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings
title Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings
title_full Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings
title_fullStr Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings
title_full_unstemmed Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings
title_short Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings
title_sort organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20043838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-84
work_keys_str_mv AT postedwardp organizationalfactorsanddepressionmanagementincommunitybasedprimarycaresettings
AT kilbourneamym organizationalfactorsanddepressionmanagementincommunitybasedprimarycaresettings
AT bremerrobertw organizationalfactorsanddepressionmanagementincommunitybasedprimarycaresettings
AT solanofrancisx organizationalfactorsanddepressionmanagementincommunitybasedprimarycaresettings
AT pincusharoldalan organizationalfactorsanddepressionmanagementincommunitybasedprimarycaresettings
AT reynoldscharlesf organizationalfactorsanddepressionmanagementincommunitybasedprimarycaresettings