Cargando…

A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits

BACKGROUND: Outbreak investigation is a core function of public health agencies. Suboptimal outbreak investigation endangers both public health and agency reputations. While audits of clinical medical and nursing practice are conducted as part of continuous quality improvement, public health agencie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalton, Craig B, Merritt, Tony D, Durrheim, David N, Munnoch, Sally A, Kirk, Martyn D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20017958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-472
_version_ 1782176898428698624
author Dalton, Craig B
Merritt, Tony D
Durrheim, David N
Munnoch, Sally A
Kirk, Martyn D
author_facet Dalton, Craig B
Merritt, Tony D
Durrheim, David N
Munnoch, Sally A
Kirk, Martyn D
author_sort Dalton, Craig B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outbreak investigation is a core function of public health agencies. Suboptimal outbreak investigation endangers both public health and agency reputations. While audits of clinical medical and nursing practice are conducted as part of continuous quality improvement, public health agencies rarely make systematic use of structured audits to ensure best practice for outbreak responses, and there is limited guidance or policy to guide outbreak audit. METHODS: A framework for prioritising which outbreak investigations to audit, an approach for conducting a successful audit, and a template for audit trigger questions was developed and trialled in four foodborne outbreaks and a respiratory disease outbreak in Australia. RESULTS: The following issues were identified across several structured audits: the need for clear definitions of roles and responsibilities both within and between agencies, improved communication between agencies and with external stakeholders involved in outbreaks, and the need for development of performance standards in outbreak investigations - particularly in relation to timeliness of response. Participants considered the audit process and methodology to be clear, useful, and non-threatening. Most audits can be conducted within two to three hours, however, some participants felt this limited the scope of the audit. CONCLUSION: The framework was acceptable to participants, provided an opportunity for clarifying perceptions and enhancing partnership approaches, and provided useful recommendations for approaching future outbreaks. Future challenges include incorporating feedback from broader stakeholder groups, for example those of affected cases, institutions and businesses; assessing the quality of a specific audit; developing training for both participants and facilitators; and building a central capacity to support jurisdictions embarking on an audit. The incorporation of measurable performance criteria or sharing of benchmark performance criteria will assist in the standardisation of outbreak investigation audit and further quality improvement.
format Text
id pubmed-2813237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28132372010-01-29 A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits Dalton, Craig B Merritt, Tony D Durrheim, David N Munnoch, Sally A Kirk, Martyn D BMC Public Health Correspondence BACKGROUND: Outbreak investigation is a core function of public health agencies. Suboptimal outbreak investigation endangers both public health and agency reputations. While audits of clinical medical and nursing practice are conducted as part of continuous quality improvement, public health agencies rarely make systematic use of structured audits to ensure best practice for outbreak responses, and there is limited guidance or policy to guide outbreak audit. METHODS: A framework for prioritising which outbreak investigations to audit, an approach for conducting a successful audit, and a template for audit trigger questions was developed and trialled in four foodborne outbreaks and a respiratory disease outbreak in Australia. RESULTS: The following issues were identified across several structured audits: the need for clear definitions of roles and responsibilities both within and between agencies, improved communication between agencies and with external stakeholders involved in outbreaks, and the need for development of performance standards in outbreak investigations - particularly in relation to timeliness of response. Participants considered the audit process and methodology to be clear, useful, and non-threatening. Most audits can be conducted within two to three hours, however, some participants felt this limited the scope of the audit. CONCLUSION: The framework was acceptable to participants, provided an opportunity for clarifying perceptions and enhancing partnership approaches, and provided useful recommendations for approaching future outbreaks. Future challenges include incorporating feedback from broader stakeholder groups, for example those of affected cases, institutions and businesses; assessing the quality of a specific audit; developing training for both participants and facilitators; and building a central capacity to support jurisdictions embarking on an audit. The incorporation of measurable performance criteria or sharing of benchmark performance criteria will assist in the standardisation of outbreak investigation audit and further quality improvement. BioMed Central 2009-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2813237/ /pubmed/20017958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-472 Text en Copyright ©2009 Dalton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Dalton, Craig B
Merritt, Tony D
Durrheim, David N
Munnoch, Sally A
Kirk, Martyn D
A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
title A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
title_full A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
title_fullStr A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
title_full_unstemmed A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
title_short A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
title_sort structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20017958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-472
work_keys_str_mv AT daltoncraigb astructuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT merritttonyd astructuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT durrheimdavidn astructuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT munnochsallya astructuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT kirkmartynd astructuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT daltoncraigb structuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT merritttonyd structuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT durrheimdavidn structuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT munnochsallya structuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits
AT kirkmartynd structuredframeworkforimprovingoutbreakinvestigationaudits