Cargando…

Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this was to evaluate FDG-PET (2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography) for assessment of residual tumour after primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer in comparison with conventional imaging modalities. METHODS: In a prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dose-Schwarz, J, Tiling, R, Avril-Sassen, S, Mahner, S, Lebeau, A, Weber, C, Schwaiger, M, Jänicke, F, Untch, M, Avril, N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605427
_version_ 1782176955209089024
author Dose-Schwarz, J
Tiling, R
Avril-Sassen, S
Mahner, S
Lebeau, A
Weber, C
Schwaiger, M
Jänicke, F
Untch, M
Avril, N
author_facet Dose-Schwarz, J
Tiling, R
Avril-Sassen, S
Mahner, S
Lebeau, A
Weber, C
Schwaiger, M
Jänicke, F
Untch, M
Avril, N
author_sort Dose-Schwarz, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this was to evaluate FDG-PET (2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography) for assessment of residual tumour after primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer in comparison with conventional imaging modalities. METHODS: In a prospective multicentre trial, 99 patients underwent one or more breast imaging modalities before surgery in addition to clinical examination, namely, FDG-PET (n=89), mammography (n=47), ultrasound (n=46), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n=46). The presence of residual tumour by conventional imaging, dichotomised as positive or negative, and the level of FDG uptake (standardised uptake values, SUV) were compared with histopathology, which served as the reference standard. Patients with no residual tumour or only small microscopic foci of residual tumour were classified as having minimal residual disease and those with extensive microscopic and macroscopic residual tumour tissue were classified as having gross residual disease. RESULTS: By applying a threshold SUV of 2.0, the sensitivity of FDG-PET for residual tumour was 32.9% (specificity, 87.5%) and increased to 57.5% (specificity, 62.5%) at a threshold SUV of 1.5. Conventional imaging modalities were more sensitive in identifying residual tumour, but had a low corresponding specificity; sensitivity and specificity were as follows: MRI 97.6 and 40.0%, mammography 92.5 and 57.1%, ultrasound 92.0 and 37.5%, respectively. Breast MRI provided the highest accuracy (91.3%), whereas FDG-PET had the lowest accuracy (42.7%). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET does not provide an accurate assessment of residual tumour after primary chemotherapy of breast cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging offers the highest sensitivity, but all imaging modalities have distinct limitations in the assessment of residual tumour tissue when compared with histopathology.
format Text
id pubmed-2813758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28137582011-01-05 Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer Dose-Schwarz, J Tiling, R Avril-Sassen, S Mahner, S Lebeau, A Weber, C Schwaiger, M Jänicke, F Untch, M Avril, N Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The aim of this was to evaluate FDG-PET (2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography) for assessment of residual tumour after primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer in comparison with conventional imaging modalities. METHODS: In a prospective multicentre trial, 99 patients underwent one or more breast imaging modalities before surgery in addition to clinical examination, namely, FDG-PET (n=89), mammography (n=47), ultrasound (n=46), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n=46). The presence of residual tumour by conventional imaging, dichotomised as positive or negative, and the level of FDG uptake (standardised uptake values, SUV) were compared with histopathology, which served as the reference standard. Patients with no residual tumour or only small microscopic foci of residual tumour were classified as having minimal residual disease and those with extensive microscopic and macroscopic residual tumour tissue were classified as having gross residual disease. RESULTS: By applying a threshold SUV of 2.0, the sensitivity of FDG-PET for residual tumour was 32.9% (specificity, 87.5%) and increased to 57.5% (specificity, 62.5%) at a threshold SUV of 1.5. Conventional imaging modalities were more sensitive in identifying residual tumour, but had a low corresponding specificity; sensitivity and specificity were as follows: MRI 97.6 and 40.0%, mammography 92.5 and 57.1%, ultrasound 92.0 and 37.5%, respectively. Breast MRI provided the highest accuracy (91.3%), whereas FDG-PET had the lowest accuracy (42.7%). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET does not provide an accurate assessment of residual tumour after primary chemotherapy of breast cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging offers the highest sensitivity, but all imaging modalities have distinct limitations in the assessment of residual tumour tissue when compared with histopathology. Nature Publishing Group 2010-01-05 2009-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2813758/ /pubmed/19920815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605427 Text en Copyright © 2010 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Dose-Schwarz, J
Tiling, R
Avril-Sassen, S
Mahner, S
Lebeau, A
Weber, C
Schwaiger, M
Jänicke, F
Untch, M
Avril, N
Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer
title Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer
title_full Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer
title_fullStr Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer
title_short Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer
title_sort assessment of residual tumour by fdg-pet: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605427
work_keys_str_mv AT doseschwarzj assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT tilingr assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT avrilsassens assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT mahners assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT lebeaua assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT weberc assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT schwaigerm assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT janickef assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT untchm assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer
AT avriln assessmentofresidualtumourbyfdgpetconventionalimagingandclinicalexaminationfollowingprimarychemotherapyoflargeandlocallyadvancedbreastcancer