Cargando…
The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs
BACKGROUND: Computational de novo discovery of transcription factor binding sites is still a challenging problem. The growing number of sequenced genomes allows integrating orthology evidence with coregulation information when searching for motifs. Moreover, the more advanced motif detection algorit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2815771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20140085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008938 |
_version_ | 1782177042287034368 |
---|---|
author | Storms, Valerie Claeys, Marleen Sanchez, Aminael De Moor, Bart Verstuyf, Annemieke Marchal, Kathleen |
author_facet | Storms, Valerie Claeys, Marleen Sanchez, Aminael De Moor, Bart Verstuyf, Annemieke Marchal, Kathleen |
author_sort | Storms, Valerie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computational de novo discovery of transcription factor binding sites is still a challenging problem. The growing number of sequenced genomes allows integrating orthology evidence with coregulation information when searching for motifs. Moreover, the more advanced motif detection algorithms explicitly model the phylogenetic relatedness between the orthologous input sequences and thus should be well adapted towards using orthologous information. In this study, we evaluated the conditions under which complementing coregulation with orthologous information improves motif detection for the class of probabilistic motif detection algorithms with an explicit evolutionary model. METHODOLOGY: We designed datasets (real and synthetic) covering different degrees of coregulation and orthologous information to test how well Phylogibbs and Phylogenetic sampler, as representatives of the motif detection algorithms with evolutionary model performed as compared to MEME, a more classical motif detection algorithm that treats orthologs independently. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Under certain conditions detecting motifs in the combined coregulation-orthology space is indeed more efficient than using each space separately, but this is not always the case. Moreover, the difference in success rate between the advanced algorithms and MEME is still marginal. The success rate of motif detection depends on the complex interplay between the added information and the specificities of the applied algorithms. Insights in this relation provide information useful to both developers and users. All benchmark datasets are available at http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~kmarchal/Supplementary_Storms_Valerie_PlosONE. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2815771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28157712010-02-07 The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs Storms, Valerie Claeys, Marleen Sanchez, Aminael De Moor, Bart Verstuyf, Annemieke Marchal, Kathleen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Computational de novo discovery of transcription factor binding sites is still a challenging problem. The growing number of sequenced genomes allows integrating orthology evidence with coregulation information when searching for motifs. Moreover, the more advanced motif detection algorithms explicitly model the phylogenetic relatedness between the orthologous input sequences and thus should be well adapted towards using orthologous information. In this study, we evaluated the conditions under which complementing coregulation with orthologous information improves motif detection for the class of probabilistic motif detection algorithms with an explicit evolutionary model. METHODOLOGY: We designed datasets (real and synthetic) covering different degrees of coregulation and orthologous information to test how well Phylogibbs and Phylogenetic sampler, as representatives of the motif detection algorithms with evolutionary model performed as compared to MEME, a more classical motif detection algorithm that treats orthologs independently. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Under certain conditions detecting motifs in the combined coregulation-orthology space is indeed more efficient than using each space separately, but this is not always the case. Moreover, the difference in success rate between the advanced algorithms and MEME is still marginal. The success rate of motif detection depends on the complex interplay between the added information and the specificities of the applied algorithms. Insights in this relation provide information useful to both developers and users. All benchmark datasets are available at http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~kmarchal/Supplementary_Storms_Valerie_PlosONE. Public Library of Science 2010-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2815771/ /pubmed/20140085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008938 Text en Storms et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Storms, Valerie Claeys, Marleen Sanchez, Aminael De Moor, Bart Verstuyf, Annemieke Marchal, Kathleen The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs |
title | The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs |
title_full | The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs |
title_short | The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs |
title_sort | effect of orthology and coregulation on detecting regulatory motifs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2815771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20140085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008938 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stormsvalerie theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT claeysmarleen theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT sanchezaminael theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT demoorbart theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT verstuyfannemieke theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT marchalkathleen theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT stormsvalerie effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT claeysmarleen effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT sanchezaminael effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT demoorbart effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT verstuyfannemieke effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs AT marchalkathleen effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs |