Cargando…

The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs

BACKGROUND: Computational de novo discovery of transcription factor binding sites is still a challenging problem. The growing number of sequenced genomes allows integrating orthology evidence with coregulation information when searching for motifs. Moreover, the more advanced motif detection algorit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Storms, Valerie, Claeys, Marleen, Sanchez, Aminael, De Moor, Bart, Verstuyf, Annemieke, Marchal, Kathleen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2815771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20140085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008938
_version_ 1782177042287034368
author Storms, Valerie
Claeys, Marleen
Sanchez, Aminael
De Moor, Bart
Verstuyf, Annemieke
Marchal, Kathleen
author_facet Storms, Valerie
Claeys, Marleen
Sanchez, Aminael
De Moor, Bart
Verstuyf, Annemieke
Marchal, Kathleen
author_sort Storms, Valerie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computational de novo discovery of transcription factor binding sites is still a challenging problem. The growing number of sequenced genomes allows integrating orthology evidence with coregulation information when searching for motifs. Moreover, the more advanced motif detection algorithms explicitly model the phylogenetic relatedness between the orthologous input sequences and thus should be well adapted towards using orthologous information. In this study, we evaluated the conditions under which complementing coregulation with orthologous information improves motif detection for the class of probabilistic motif detection algorithms with an explicit evolutionary model. METHODOLOGY: We designed datasets (real and synthetic) covering different degrees of coregulation and orthologous information to test how well Phylogibbs and Phylogenetic sampler, as representatives of the motif detection algorithms with evolutionary model performed as compared to MEME, a more classical motif detection algorithm that treats orthologs independently. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Under certain conditions detecting motifs in the combined coregulation-orthology space is indeed more efficient than using each space separately, but this is not always the case. Moreover, the difference in success rate between the advanced algorithms and MEME is still marginal. The success rate of motif detection depends on the complex interplay between the added information and the specificities of the applied algorithms. Insights in this relation provide information useful to both developers and users. All benchmark datasets are available at http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~kmarchal/Supplementary_Storms_Valerie_PlosONE.
format Text
id pubmed-2815771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28157712010-02-07 The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs Storms, Valerie Claeys, Marleen Sanchez, Aminael De Moor, Bart Verstuyf, Annemieke Marchal, Kathleen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Computational de novo discovery of transcription factor binding sites is still a challenging problem. The growing number of sequenced genomes allows integrating orthology evidence with coregulation information when searching for motifs. Moreover, the more advanced motif detection algorithms explicitly model the phylogenetic relatedness between the orthologous input sequences and thus should be well adapted towards using orthologous information. In this study, we evaluated the conditions under which complementing coregulation with orthologous information improves motif detection for the class of probabilistic motif detection algorithms with an explicit evolutionary model. METHODOLOGY: We designed datasets (real and synthetic) covering different degrees of coregulation and orthologous information to test how well Phylogibbs and Phylogenetic sampler, as representatives of the motif detection algorithms with evolutionary model performed as compared to MEME, a more classical motif detection algorithm that treats orthologs independently. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Under certain conditions detecting motifs in the combined coregulation-orthology space is indeed more efficient than using each space separately, but this is not always the case. Moreover, the difference in success rate between the advanced algorithms and MEME is still marginal. The success rate of motif detection depends on the complex interplay between the added information and the specificities of the applied algorithms. Insights in this relation provide information useful to both developers and users. All benchmark datasets are available at http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~kmarchal/Supplementary_Storms_Valerie_PlosONE. Public Library of Science 2010-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2815771/ /pubmed/20140085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008938 Text en Storms et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Storms, Valerie
Claeys, Marleen
Sanchez, Aminael
De Moor, Bart
Verstuyf, Annemieke
Marchal, Kathleen
The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs
title The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs
title_full The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs
title_fullStr The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs
title_short The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs
title_sort effect of orthology and coregulation on detecting regulatory motifs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2815771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20140085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008938
work_keys_str_mv AT stormsvalerie theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT claeysmarleen theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT sanchezaminael theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT demoorbart theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT verstuyfannemieke theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT marchalkathleen theeffectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT stormsvalerie effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT claeysmarleen effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT sanchezaminael effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT demoorbart effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT verstuyfannemieke effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs
AT marchalkathleen effectoforthologyandcoregulationondetectingregulatorymotifs