Cargando…
Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews summarize all pertinent evidence on a defined health question. They help clinical scientists to direct their research and clinicians to keep updated. Our objective was to determine the extent to which systematic reviews are clustered in a large collection of clinical j...
Autores principales: | Montori, Victor M, Wilczynski, Nancy L, Morgan, Douglas, Haynes, R Brian |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC281591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14633274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-1-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Important citation identification by exploiting content and section-wise in-text citation count
por: Nazir, Shahzad, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care
por: Wilczynski, Nancy L, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: Methods of a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review
por: Haynes, R Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Citations that Count, An Editorial Address to the ISCO Membership
por: Meijer, Gerrit A.
Publicado: (2004)