Cargando…

Better than Expected or as Bad as You Thought? The Neurocognitive Development of Probabilistic Feedback Processing

Learning from feedback lies at the foundation of adaptive behavior. Two prior neuroimaging studies have suggested that there are qualitative differences in how children and adults use feedback by demonstrating that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and parietal cortex were more active after neg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Bos, Wouter, Güroğlu, Berna, van den Bulk, Bianca G., Rombouts, Serge A.R.B., Crone, Eveline A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20140268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.052.2009
_version_ 1782177074085101568
author van den Bos, Wouter
Güroğlu, Berna
van den Bulk, Bianca G.
Rombouts, Serge A.R.B.
Crone, Eveline A.
author_facet van den Bos, Wouter
Güroğlu, Berna
van den Bulk, Bianca G.
Rombouts, Serge A.R.B.
Crone, Eveline A.
author_sort van den Bos, Wouter
collection PubMed
description Learning from feedback lies at the foundation of adaptive behavior. Two prior neuroimaging studies have suggested that there are qualitative differences in how children and adults use feedback by demonstrating that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and parietal cortex were more active after negative feedback for adults, but after positive feedback for children. In the current study we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test whether this difference is related to valence or informative value of the feedback by examining neural responses to negative and positive feedback while applying probabilistic rules. In total, 67 healthy volunteers between ages 8 and 22 participated in the study (8–11 years, n = 18; 13–16 years, n = 27; 18–22 years, n = 22). Behavioral comparisons showed that all participants were able to learn probabilistic rules equally well. DLPFC and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex were more active in younger children following positive feedback and in adults following negative feedback, but only when exploring alternative rules, not when applying the most advantageous rules. These findings suggest that developmental differences in neural responses to feedback are not related to valence per se, but that there is an age-related change in processing learning signals with different informative value.
format Text
id pubmed-2816174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28161742010-02-05 Better than Expected or as Bad as You Thought? The Neurocognitive Development of Probabilistic Feedback Processing van den Bos, Wouter Güroğlu, Berna van den Bulk, Bianca G. Rombouts, Serge A.R.B. Crone, Eveline A. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Learning from feedback lies at the foundation of adaptive behavior. Two prior neuroimaging studies have suggested that there are qualitative differences in how children and adults use feedback by demonstrating that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and parietal cortex were more active after negative feedback for adults, but after positive feedback for children. In the current study we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test whether this difference is related to valence or informative value of the feedback by examining neural responses to negative and positive feedback while applying probabilistic rules. In total, 67 healthy volunteers between ages 8 and 22 participated in the study (8–11 years, n = 18; 13–16 years, n = 27; 18–22 years, n = 22). Behavioral comparisons showed that all participants were able to learn probabilistic rules equally well. DLPFC and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex were more active in younger children following positive feedback and in adults following negative feedback, but only when exploring alternative rules, not when applying the most advantageous rules. These findings suggest that developmental differences in neural responses to feedback are not related to valence per se, but that there is an age-related change in processing learning signals with different informative value. Frontiers Research Foundation 2009-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2816174/ /pubmed/20140268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.052.2009 Text en Copyright © 2009 van den Bos, Güroğlu, van den Bulk, Rombouts and Crone. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
van den Bos, Wouter
Güroğlu, Berna
van den Bulk, Bianca G.
Rombouts, Serge A.R.B.
Crone, Eveline A.
Better than Expected or as Bad as You Thought? The Neurocognitive Development of Probabilistic Feedback Processing
title Better than Expected or as Bad as You Thought? The Neurocognitive Development of Probabilistic Feedback Processing
title_full Better than Expected or as Bad as You Thought? The Neurocognitive Development of Probabilistic Feedback Processing
title_fullStr Better than Expected or as Bad as You Thought? The Neurocognitive Development of Probabilistic Feedback Processing
title_full_unstemmed Better than Expected or as Bad as You Thought? The Neurocognitive Development of Probabilistic Feedback Processing
title_short Better than Expected or as Bad as You Thought? The Neurocognitive Development of Probabilistic Feedback Processing
title_sort better than expected or as bad as you thought? the neurocognitive development of probabilistic feedback processing
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20140268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.052.2009
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenboswouter betterthanexpectedorasbadasyouthoughttheneurocognitivedevelopmentofprobabilisticfeedbackprocessing
AT gurogluberna betterthanexpectedorasbadasyouthoughttheneurocognitivedevelopmentofprobabilisticfeedbackprocessing
AT vandenbulkbiancag betterthanexpectedorasbadasyouthoughttheneurocognitivedevelopmentofprobabilisticfeedbackprocessing
AT romboutssergearb betterthanexpectedorasbadasyouthoughttheneurocognitivedevelopmentofprobabilisticfeedbackprocessing
AT croneevelinea betterthanexpectedorasbadasyouthoughttheneurocognitivedevelopmentofprobabilisticfeedbackprocessing