Cargando…

Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze published data on the diagnostic performance of combined 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the detection of primary tumors in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwee, Thomas C., Kwee, Robert M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1194-4
_version_ 1782177083486633984
author Kwee, Thomas C.
Kwee, Robert M.
author_facet Kwee, Thomas C.
Kwee, Robert M.
author_sort Kwee, Thomas C.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze published data on the diagnostic performance of combined 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the detection of primary tumors in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). A systematic search for relevant studies was performed of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Reported detection rates, sensitivities and specificities were meta-analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed if results of individual studies were heterogeneous. The 11 included studies, comprising a total sample size of 433 patients with CUP, had moderate methodological quality. Overall primary tumor detection rate, pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT were 37%, 84% (95% CI 78–88%) and 84% (95% CI 78–89%), respectively. Sensitivity was heterogeneous across studies (P = 0.0001), whereas specificity was homogeneous across studies (P = 0.2114). Completeness of diagnostic workup before FDG-PET/CT, location of metastases of unknown primary, administration of CT contrast agents, type of FDG-PET/CT images evaluated and way of FDG-PET/CT review did not significantly influence diagnostic performance. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT can be a useful method for unknown primary tumor detection. Future studies are required to prove the assumed advantage of FDG-PET/CT over FDG-PET alone and to further explore causes of heterogeneity.
format Text
id pubmed-2816234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28162342010-02-13 Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis Kwee, Thomas C. Kwee, Robert M. Eur Radiol Oncology The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze published data on the diagnostic performance of combined 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the detection of primary tumors in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). A systematic search for relevant studies was performed of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Reported detection rates, sensitivities and specificities were meta-analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed if results of individual studies were heterogeneous. The 11 included studies, comprising a total sample size of 433 patients with CUP, had moderate methodological quality. Overall primary tumor detection rate, pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT were 37%, 84% (95% CI 78–88%) and 84% (95% CI 78–89%), respectively. Sensitivity was heterogeneous across studies (P = 0.0001), whereas specificity was homogeneous across studies (P = 0.2114). Completeness of diagnostic workup before FDG-PET/CT, location of metastases of unknown primary, administration of CT contrast agents, type of FDG-PET/CT images evaluated and way of FDG-PET/CT review did not significantly influence diagnostic performance. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT can be a useful method for unknown primary tumor detection. Future studies are required to prove the assumed advantage of FDG-PET/CT over FDG-PET alone and to further explore causes of heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag 2008-10-17 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2816234/ /pubmed/18925401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1194-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Kwee, Thomas C.
Kwee, Robert M.
Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort combined fdg-pet/ct for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1194-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kweethomasc combinedfdgpetctforthedetectionofunknownprimarytumorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kweerobertm combinedfdgpetctforthedetectionofunknownprimarytumorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis