Cargando…

Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions

Men and women seem to process emotions and react to them differently. Yet, few neurophysiological studies have systematically investigated gender differences in emotional processing. Here, we studied gender differences using Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and Skin Conductance Responses (SCR) record...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lithari, C., Frantzidis, C. A., Papadelis, C., Vivas, Ana B., Klados, M. A., Kourtidou-Papadeli, C., Pappas, C., Ioannides, A. A., Bamidis, P. D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20043199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0130-5
_version_ 1782177134959132672
author Lithari, C.
Frantzidis, C. A.
Papadelis, C.
Vivas, Ana B.
Klados, M. A.
Kourtidou-Papadeli, C.
Pappas, C.
Ioannides, A. A.
Bamidis, P. D.
author_facet Lithari, C.
Frantzidis, C. A.
Papadelis, C.
Vivas, Ana B.
Klados, M. A.
Kourtidou-Papadeli, C.
Pappas, C.
Ioannides, A. A.
Bamidis, P. D.
author_sort Lithari, C.
collection PubMed
description Men and women seem to process emotions and react to them differently. Yet, few neurophysiological studies have systematically investigated gender differences in emotional processing. Here, we studied gender differences using Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and Skin Conductance Responses (SCR) recorded from participants who passively viewed emotional pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). The arousal and valence dimension of the stimuli were manipulated orthogonally. The peak amplitude and peak latency of ERP components and SCR were analyzed separately, and the scalp topographies of significant ERP differences were documented. Females responded with enhanced negative components (N100 and N200), in comparison to males, especially to the unpleasant visual stimuli, whereas both genders responded faster to high arousing or unpleasant stimuli. Scalp topographies revealed more pronounced gender differences on central and left hemisphere areas. Our results suggest a difference in the way emotional stimuli are processed by genders: unpleasant and high arousing stimuli evoke greater ERP amplitudes in women relatively to men. It also seems that unpleasant or high arousing stimuli are temporally prioritized during visual processing by both genders.
format Text
id pubmed-2816804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28168042010-02-13 Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions Lithari, C. Frantzidis, C. A. Papadelis, C. Vivas, Ana B. Klados, M. A. Kourtidou-Papadeli, C. Pappas, C. Ioannides, A. A. Bamidis, P. D. Brain Topogr Original Paper Men and women seem to process emotions and react to them differently. Yet, few neurophysiological studies have systematically investigated gender differences in emotional processing. Here, we studied gender differences using Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and Skin Conductance Responses (SCR) recorded from participants who passively viewed emotional pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). The arousal and valence dimension of the stimuli were manipulated orthogonally. The peak amplitude and peak latency of ERP components and SCR were analyzed separately, and the scalp topographies of significant ERP differences were documented. Females responded with enhanced negative components (N100 and N200), in comparison to males, especially to the unpleasant visual stimuli, whereas both genders responded faster to high arousing or unpleasant stimuli. Scalp topographies revealed more pronounced gender differences on central and left hemisphere areas. Our results suggest a difference in the way emotional stimuli are processed by genders: unpleasant and high arousing stimuli evoke greater ERP amplitudes in women relatively to men. It also seems that unpleasant or high arousing stimuli are temporally prioritized during visual processing by both genders. Springer US 2009-12-31 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2816804/ /pubmed/20043199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0130-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lithari, C.
Frantzidis, C. A.
Papadelis, C.
Vivas, Ana B.
Klados, M. A.
Kourtidou-Papadeli, C.
Pappas, C.
Ioannides, A. A.
Bamidis, P. D.
Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions
title Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions
title_full Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions
title_fullStr Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions
title_full_unstemmed Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions
title_short Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions
title_sort are females more responsive to emotional stimuli? a neurophysiological study across arousal and valence dimensions
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20043199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0130-5
work_keys_str_mv AT litharic arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions
AT frantzidisca arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions
AT papadelisc arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions
AT vivasanab arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions
AT kladosma arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions
AT kourtidoupapadelic arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions
AT pappasc arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions
AT ioannidesaa arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions
AT bamidispd arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions