Cargando…
Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions
Men and women seem to process emotions and react to them differently. Yet, few neurophysiological studies have systematically investigated gender differences in emotional processing. Here, we studied gender differences using Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and Skin Conductance Responses (SCR) record...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20043199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0130-5 |
_version_ | 1782177134959132672 |
---|---|
author | Lithari, C. Frantzidis, C. A. Papadelis, C. Vivas, Ana B. Klados, M. A. Kourtidou-Papadeli, C. Pappas, C. Ioannides, A. A. Bamidis, P. D. |
author_facet | Lithari, C. Frantzidis, C. A. Papadelis, C. Vivas, Ana B. Klados, M. A. Kourtidou-Papadeli, C. Pappas, C. Ioannides, A. A. Bamidis, P. D. |
author_sort | Lithari, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Men and women seem to process emotions and react to them differently. Yet, few neurophysiological studies have systematically investigated gender differences in emotional processing. Here, we studied gender differences using Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and Skin Conductance Responses (SCR) recorded from participants who passively viewed emotional pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). The arousal and valence dimension of the stimuli were manipulated orthogonally. The peak amplitude and peak latency of ERP components and SCR were analyzed separately, and the scalp topographies of significant ERP differences were documented. Females responded with enhanced negative components (N100 and N200), in comparison to males, especially to the unpleasant visual stimuli, whereas both genders responded faster to high arousing or unpleasant stimuli. Scalp topographies revealed more pronounced gender differences on central and left hemisphere areas. Our results suggest a difference in the way emotional stimuli are processed by genders: unpleasant and high arousing stimuli evoke greater ERP amplitudes in women relatively to men. It also seems that unpleasant or high arousing stimuli are temporally prioritized during visual processing by both genders. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2816804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28168042010-02-13 Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions Lithari, C. Frantzidis, C. A. Papadelis, C. Vivas, Ana B. Klados, M. A. Kourtidou-Papadeli, C. Pappas, C. Ioannides, A. A. Bamidis, P. D. Brain Topogr Original Paper Men and women seem to process emotions and react to them differently. Yet, few neurophysiological studies have systematically investigated gender differences in emotional processing. Here, we studied gender differences using Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and Skin Conductance Responses (SCR) recorded from participants who passively viewed emotional pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). The arousal and valence dimension of the stimuli were manipulated orthogonally. The peak amplitude and peak latency of ERP components and SCR were analyzed separately, and the scalp topographies of significant ERP differences were documented. Females responded with enhanced negative components (N100 and N200), in comparison to males, especially to the unpleasant visual stimuli, whereas both genders responded faster to high arousing or unpleasant stimuli. Scalp topographies revealed more pronounced gender differences on central and left hemisphere areas. Our results suggest a difference in the way emotional stimuli are processed by genders: unpleasant and high arousing stimuli evoke greater ERP amplitudes in women relatively to men. It also seems that unpleasant or high arousing stimuli are temporally prioritized during visual processing by both genders. Springer US 2009-12-31 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2816804/ /pubmed/20043199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0130-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lithari, C. Frantzidis, C. A. Papadelis, C. Vivas, Ana B. Klados, M. A. Kourtidou-Papadeli, C. Pappas, C. Ioannides, A. A. Bamidis, P. D. Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions |
title | Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions |
title_full | Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions |
title_fullStr | Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions |
title_short | Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions |
title_sort | are females more responsive to emotional stimuli? a neurophysiological study across arousal and valence dimensions |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20043199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0130-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT litharic arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions AT frantzidisca arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions AT papadelisc arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions AT vivasanab arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions AT kladosma arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions AT kourtidoupapadelic arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions AT pappasc arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions AT ioannidesaa arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions AT bamidispd arefemalesmoreresponsivetoemotionalstimulianeurophysiologicalstudyacrossarousalandvalencedimensions |