Cargando…

Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes

The deep phylogeny of eukaryotes is an important but extremely difficult problem of evolutionary biology. Five eukaryotic supergroups are relatively well established but the relationship between these supergroups remains elusive, and their divergence seems to best fit a “Big Bang” model. Attempts we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogozin, Igor B., Basu, Malay Kumar, Csürös, Miklós, Koonin, Eugene V.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20333181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evp011
_version_ 1782177188504666112
author Rogozin, Igor B.
Basu, Malay Kumar
Csürös, Miklós
Koonin, Eugene V.
author_facet Rogozin, Igor B.
Basu, Malay Kumar
Csürös, Miklós
Koonin, Eugene V.
author_sort Rogozin, Igor B.
collection PubMed
description The deep phylogeny of eukaryotes is an important but extremely difficult problem of evolutionary biology. Five eukaryotic supergroups are relatively well established but the relationship between these supergroups remains elusive, and their divergence seems to best fit a “Big Bang” model. Attempts were made to root the tree of eukaryotes by using potential derived shared characters such as unique fusions of conserved genes. One popular model of eukaryotic evolution that emerged from this type of analysis is the unikont–bikont phylogeny: The unikont branch consists of Metazoa, Choanozoa, Fungi, and Amoebozoa, whereas bikonts include the rest of eukaryotes, namely, Plantae (green plants, Chlorophyta, and Rhodophyta), Chromalveolata, excavates, and Rhizaria. We reexamine the relationships between the eukaryotic supergroups using a genome-wide analysis of rare genomic changes (RGCs) associated with multiple, conserved amino acids (RGC_CAMs and RGC_CAs), to resolve trifurcations of major eukaryotic lineages. The results do not support the basal position of Chromalveolata with respect to Plantae and unikonts or the monophyly of the bikont group and appear to be best compatible with the monophyly of unikonts and Chromalveolata. Chromalveolata show a distinct, additional signal of affinity with Plantae, conceivably, owing to genes transferred from the secondary, red algal symbiont. Excavates are derived forms, with extremely long branches that complicate phylogenetic inference; nevertheless, the RGC analysis suggests that they are significantly more likely to cluster with the unikont–Chromalveolata assemblage than with the Plantae. Thus, the first split in eukaryotic evolution might lie between photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic forms and so could have been triggered by the endosymbiosis between an ancestral unicellular eukaryote and a cyanobacterium that gave rise to the chloroplast.
format Text
id pubmed-2817406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28174062010-03-22 Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes Rogozin, Igor B. Basu, Malay Kumar Csürös, Miklós Koonin, Eugene V. Genome Biol Evol Research Articles The deep phylogeny of eukaryotes is an important but extremely difficult problem of evolutionary biology. Five eukaryotic supergroups are relatively well established but the relationship between these supergroups remains elusive, and their divergence seems to best fit a “Big Bang” model. Attempts were made to root the tree of eukaryotes by using potential derived shared characters such as unique fusions of conserved genes. One popular model of eukaryotic evolution that emerged from this type of analysis is the unikont–bikont phylogeny: The unikont branch consists of Metazoa, Choanozoa, Fungi, and Amoebozoa, whereas bikonts include the rest of eukaryotes, namely, Plantae (green plants, Chlorophyta, and Rhodophyta), Chromalveolata, excavates, and Rhizaria. We reexamine the relationships between the eukaryotic supergroups using a genome-wide analysis of rare genomic changes (RGCs) associated with multiple, conserved amino acids (RGC_CAMs and RGC_CAs), to resolve trifurcations of major eukaryotic lineages. The results do not support the basal position of Chromalveolata with respect to Plantae and unikonts or the monophyly of the bikont group and appear to be best compatible with the monophyly of unikonts and Chromalveolata. Chromalveolata show a distinct, additional signal of affinity with Plantae, conceivably, owing to genes transferred from the secondary, red algal symbiont. Excavates are derived forms, with extremely long branches that complicate phylogenetic inference; nevertheless, the RGC analysis suggests that they are significantly more likely to cluster with the unikont–Chromalveolata assemblage than with the Plantae. Thus, the first split in eukaryotic evolution might lie between photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic forms and so could have been triggered by the endosymbiosis between an ancestral unicellular eukaryote and a cyanobacterium that gave rise to the chloroplast. Oxford University Press 2009 2009-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2817406/ /pubmed/20333181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evp011 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Rogozin, Igor B.
Basu, Malay Kumar
Csürös, Miklós
Koonin, Eugene V.
Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes
title Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes
title_full Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes
title_fullStr Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes
title_short Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes
title_sort analysis of rare genomic changes does not support the unikont–bikont phylogeny and suggests cyanobacterial symbiosis as the point of primary radiation of eukaryotes
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20333181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evp011
work_keys_str_mv AT rogozinigorb analysisofraregenomicchangesdoesnotsupporttheunikontbikontphylogenyandsuggestscyanobacterialsymbiosisasthepointofprimaryradiationofeukaryotes
AT basumalaykumar analysisofraregenomicchangesdoesnotsupporttheunikontbikontphylogenyandsuggestscyanobacterialsymbiosisasthepointofprimaryradiationofeukaryotes
AT csurosmiklos analysisofraregenomicchangesdoesnotsupporttheunikontbikontphylogenyandsuggestscyanobacterialsymbiosisasthepointofprimaryradiationofeukaryotes
AT koonineugenev analysisofraregenomicchangesdoesnotsupporttheunikontbikontphylogenyandsuggestscyanobacterialsymbiosisasthepointofprimaryradiationofeukaryotes