Cargando…
What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!
Screening of human preimplantation embryos for numerical chromosome abnormalities has been conducted mostly at the preimplantation stage using fluorescence in situ hybridization. However, it is clear that preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) as it is currently practiced does not improve live birt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20031957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep446 |
_version_ | 1782177217019641856 |
---|---|
author | Geraedts, Joep Collins, John Gianaroli, Luca Goossens, Veerle Handyside, Alan Harper, Joyce Montag, Markus Repping, Sjoerd Schmutzler, Andreas |
author_facet | Geraedts, Joep Collins, John Gianaroli, Luca Goossens, Veerle Handyside, Alan Harper, Joyce Montag, Markus Repping, Sjoerd Schmutzler, Andreas |
author_sort | Geraedts, Joep |
collection | PubMed |
description | Screening of human preimplantation embryos for numerical chromosome abnormalities has been conducted mostly at the preimplantation stage using fluorescence in situ hybridization. However, it is clear that preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) as it is currently practiced does not improve live birth rates. Therefore the ESHRE PGS Task Force has decided to start a proof of principle study with the aim of determining whether biopsy of the first and second polar body followed by subsequent analysis of the complete chromosome complement of these polar bodies using an array based technique enables a timely identification of the chromosomal status of an oocyte. If the principle of this approach can be proven, it is obvious that a multicentre randomized controlled trial should then be started to determine the clinical value of this technique. In this way the ESHRE PGS Task Force hopes to redirect preimplantation screening from the blind alley to the main road of assisted reproduction. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2817568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28175682010-02-09 What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! Geraedts, Joep Collins, John Gianaroli, Luca Goossens, Veerle Handyside, Alan Harper, Joyce Montag, Markus Repping, Sjoerd Schmutzler, Andreas Hum Reprod Debate - Continued Screening of human preimplantation embryos for numerical chromosome abnormalities has been conducted mostly at the preimplantation stage using fluorescence in situ hybridization. However, it is clear that preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) as it is currently practiced does not improve live birth rates. Therefore the ESHRE PGS Task Force has decided to start a proof of principle study with the aim of determining whether biopsy of the first and second polar body followed by subsequent analysis of the complete chromosome complement of these polar bodies using an array based technique enables a timely identification of the chromosomal status of an oocyte. If the principle of this approach can be proven, it is obvious that a multicentre randomized controlled trial should then be started to determine the clinical value of this technique. In this way the ESHRE PGS Task Force hopes to redirect preimplantation screening from the blind alley to the main road of assisted reproduction. Oxford University Press 2010-03 2009-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2817568/ /pubmed/20031957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep446 Text en © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5) which, permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debate - Continued Geraedts, Joep Collins, John Gianaroli, Luca Goossens, Veerle Handyside, Alan Harper, Joyce Montag, Markus Repping, Sjoerd Schmutzler, Andreas What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! |
title | What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! |
title_full | What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! |
title_fullStr | What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! |
title_full_unstemmed | What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! |
title_short | What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! |
title_sort | what next for preimplantation genetic screening? a polar body approach! |
topic | Debate - Continued |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20031957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geraedtsjoep whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach AT collinsjohn whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach AT gianaroliluca whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach AT goossensveerle whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach AT handysidealan whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach AT harperjoyce whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach AT montagmarkus whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach AT reppingsjoerd whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach AT schmutzlerandreas whatnextforpreimplantationgeneticscreeningapolarbodyapproach |