Cargando…

Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Intravaginal practices are commonly used by women to manage their vaginal health and sexual life. These practices could, however, affect intravaginal mucosal integrity. The objectives of this study were to examine evidence for associations between: intravaginal practices and acquisition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilber, Adriane Martin, Francis, Suzanna C., Chersich, Matthew, Scott, Pippa, Redmond, Shelagh, Bender, Nicole, Miotti, Paolo, Temmerman, Marleen, Low, Nicola
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20161749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009119
_version_ 1782177239000940544
author Hilber, Adriane Martin
Francis, Suzanna C.
Chersich, Matthew
Scott, Pippa
Redmond, Shelagh
Bender, Nicole
Miotti, Paolo
Temmerman, Marleen
Low, Nicola
author_facet Hilber, Adriane Martin
Francis, Suzanna C.
Chersich, Matthew
Scott, Pippa
Redmond, Shelagh
Bender, Nicole
Miotti, Paolo
Temmerman, Marleen
Low, Nicola
author_sort Hilber, Adriane Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intravaginal practices are commonly used by women to manage their vaginal health and sexual life. These practices could, however, affect intravaginal mucosal integrity. The objectives of this study were to examine evidence for associations between: intravaginal practices and acquisition of HIV infection; intravaginal practices and vaginal infections; and vaginal infections and HIV acquisition. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review of prospective longitudinal studies, searching 15 electronic databases of journals and abstracts from two international conferences to 31(st) January 2008. Relevant articles were selected and data extracted in duplicate. Results were examined visually in forest plots and combined using random effects meta-analysis where appropriate. Of 2120 unique references we included 22 publications from 15 different studies in sub-Saharan Africa and the USA. Seven publications from five studies examined a range of intravaginal practices and HIV infection. No specific vaginal practices showed a protective effect against HIV or vaginal infections. Insertion of products for sex was associated with HIV in unadjusted analyses; only one study gave an adjusted estimate, which showed no association (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.71, 1.67). HIV incidence was higher in women reporting intravaginal cleansing but confidence intervals were wide and heterogeneity high (adjusted hazard ratio 1.88, 95%CI 0.53, 6.69, I(2) 83.2%). HIV incidence was higher in women with bacterial vaginosis (adjusted effect 1.57, 95%CI 1.26, 1.94, I(2) 19.0%) and Trichomonas vaginalis (adjusted effect 1.64, 95%CI 1.28, 2.09, I(2) 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A pathway linking intravaginal cleaning practices with vaginal infections that increase susceptibility to HIV infection is plausible but conclusive evidence is lacking. Intravaginal practices do not appear to protect women from vaginal infections or HIV and some might be harmful.
format Text
id pubmed-2817741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28177412010-02-17 Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hilber, Adriane Martin Francis, Suzanna C. Chersich, Matthew Scott, Pippa Redmond, Shelagh Bender, Nicole Miotti, Paolo Temmerman, Marleen Low, Nicola PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Intravaginal practices are commonly used by women to manage their vaginal health and sexual life. These practices could, however, affect intravaginal mucosal integrity. The objectives of this study were to examine evidence for associations between: intravaginal practices and acquisition of HIV infection; intravaginal practices and vaginal infections; and vaginal infections and HIV acquisition. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review of prospective longitudinal studies, searching 15 electronic databases of journals and abstracts from two international conferences to 31(st) January 2008. Relevant articles were selected and data extracted in duplicate. Results were examined visually in forest plots and combined using random effects meta-analysis where appropriate. Of 2120 unique references we included 22 publications from 15 different studies in sub-Saharan Africa and the USA. Seven publications from five studies examined a range of intravaginal practices and HIV infection. No specific vaginal practices showed a protective effect against HIV or vaginal infections. Insertion of products for sex was associated with HIV in unadjusted analyses; only one study gave an adjusted estimate, which showed no association (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.71, 1.67). HIV incidence was higher in women reporting intravaginal cleansing but confidence intervals were wide and heterogeneity high (adjusted hazard ratio 1.88, 95%CI 0.53, 6.69, I(2) 83.2%). HIV incidence was higher in women with bacterial vaginosis (adjusted effect 1.57, 95%CI 1.26, 1.94, I(2) 19.0%) and Trichomonas vaginalis (adjusted effect 1.64, 95%CI 1.28, 2.09, I(2) 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A pathway linking intravaginal cleaning practices with vaginal infections that increase susceptibility to HIV infection is plausible but conclusive evidence is lacking. Intravaginal practices do not appear to protect women from vaginal infections or HIV and some might be harmful. Public Library of Science 2010-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2817741/ /pubmed/20161749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009119 Text en Hilber et al. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hilber, Adriane Martin
Francis, Suzanna C.
Chersich, Matthew
Scott, Pippa
Redmond, Shelagh
Bender, Nicole
Miotti, Paolo
Temmerman, Marleen
Low, Nicola
Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort intravaginal practices, vaginal infections and hiv acquisition: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20161749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009119
work_keys_str_mv AT hilberadrianemartin intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francissuzannac intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chersichmatthew intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scottpippa intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT redmondshelagh intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bendernicole intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT miottipaolo intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT temmermanmarleen intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lownicola intravaginalpracticesvaginalinfectionsandhivacquisitionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis