Cargando…

Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements

AIMS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive phase contrast measurements of flow through planes transecting large vessels. However, some clinically valuable applications are highly sensitive to errors caused by small offsets of measured velocities if these are not adequately cor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gatehouse, Peter D, Rolf, Marijn P, Graves, Martin J, Hofman, Mark BM, Totman, John, Werner, Beat, Quest, Rebecca A, Liu, Yingmin, von Spiczak, Jochen, Dieringer, Matthias, Firmin, David N, van Rossum, Albert, Lombardi, Massimo, Schwitter, Juerg, Schulz-Menger, Jeanette, Kilner, Philip J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2818657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20074359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-5
_version_ 1782177277065297920
author Gatehouse, Peter D
Rolf, Marijn P
Graves, Martin J
Hofman, Mark BM
Totman, John
Werner, Beat
Quest, Rebecca A
Liu, Yingmin
von Spiczak, Jochen
Dieringer, Matthias
Firmin, David N
van Rossum, Albert
Lombardi, Massimo
Schwitter, Juerg
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
Kilner, Philip J
author_facet Gatehouse, Peter D
Rolf, Marijn P
Graves, Martin J
Hofman, Mark BM
Totman, John
Werner, Beat
Quest, Rebecca A
Liu, Yingmin
von Spiczak, Jochen
Dieringer, Matthias
Firmin, David N
van Rossum, Albert
Lombardi, Massimo
Schwitter, Juerg
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
Kilner, Philip J
author_sort Gatehouse, Peter D
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive phase contrast measurements of flow through planes transecting large vessels. However, some clinically valuable applications are highly sensitive to errors caused by small offsets of measured velocities if these are not adequately corrected, for example by the use of static tissue or static phantom correction of the offset error. We studied the severity of uncorrected velocity offset errors across sites and CMR systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a multi-centre, multi-vendor study, breath-hold through-plane retrospectively ECG-gated phase contrast acquisitions, as are used clinically for aortic and pulmonary flow measurement, were applied to static gelatin phantoms in twelve 1.5 T CMR systems, using a velocity encoding range of 150 cm/s. No post-processing corrections of offsets were implemented. The greatest uncorrected velocity offset, taken as an average over a 'great vessel' region (30 mm diameter) located up to 70 mm in-plane distance from the magnet isocenter, ranged from 0.4 cm/s to 4.9 cm/s. It averaged 2.7 cm/s over all the planes and systems. By theoretical calculation, a velocity offset error of 0.6 cm/s (representing just 0.4% of a 150 cm/s velocity encoding range) is barely acceptable, potentially causing about 5% miscalculation of cardiac output and up to 10% error in shunt measurement. CONCLUSION: In the absence of hardware or software upgrades able to reduce phase offset errors, all the systems tested appeared to require post-acquisition correction to achieve consistently reliable breath-hold measurements of flow. The effectiveness of offset correction software will still need testing with respect to clinical flow acquisitions.
format Text
id pubmed-2818657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28186572010-02-10 Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements Gatehouse, Peter D Rolf, Marijn P Graves, Martin J Hofman, Mark BM Totman, John Werner, Beat Quest, Rebecca A Liu, Yingmin von Spiczak, Jochen Dieringer, Matthias Firmin, David N van Rossum, Albert Lombardi, Massimo Schwitter, Juerg Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Kilner, Philip J J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research AIMS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive phase contrast measurements of flow through planes transecting large vessels. However, some clinically valuable applications are highly sensitive to errors caused by small offsets of measured velocities if these are not adequately corrected, for example by the use of static tissue or static phantom correction of the offset error. We studied the severity of uncorrected velocity offset errors across sites and CMR systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a multi-centre, multi-vendor study, breath-hold through-plane retrospectively ECG-gated phase contrast acquisitions, as are used clinically for aortic and pulmonary flow measurement, were applied to static gelatin phantoms in twelve 1.5 T CMR systems, using a velocity encoding range of 150 cm/s. No post-processing corrections of offsets were implemented. The greatest uncorrected velocity offset, taken as an average over a 'great vessel' region (30 mm diameter) located up to 70 mm in-plane distance from the magnet isocenter, ranged from 0.4 cm/s to 4.9 cm/s. It averaged 2.7 cm/s over all the planes and systems. By theoretical calculation, a velocity offset error of 0.6 cm/s (representing just 0.4% of a 150 cm/s velocity encoding range) is barely acceptable, potentially causing about 5% miscalculation of cardiac output and up to 10% error in shunt measurement. CONCLUSION: In the absence of hardware or software upgrades able to reduce phase offset errors, all the systems tested appeared to require post-acquisition correction to achieve consistently reliable breath-hold measurements of flow. The effectiveness of offset correction software will still need testing with respect to clinical flow acquisitions. BioMed Central 2010-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2818657/ /pubmed/20074359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-5 Text en Copyright ©2010 Gatehouse et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gatehouse, Peter D
Rolf, Marijn P
Graves, Martin J
Hofman, Mark BM
Totman, John
Werner, Beat
Quest, Rebecca A
Liu, Yingmin
von Spiczak, Jochen
Dieringer, Matthias
Firmin, David N
van Rossum, Albert
Lombardi, Massimo
Schwitter, Juerg
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
Kilner, Philip J
Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements
title Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements
title_full Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements
title_fullStr Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements
title_full_unstemmed Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements
title_short Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements
title_sort flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2818657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20074359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gatehousepeterd flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT rolfmarijnp flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT gravesmartinj flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT hofmanmarkbm flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT totmanjohn flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT wernerbeat flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT questrebeccaa flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT liuyingmin flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT vonspiczakjochen flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT dieringermatthias flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT firmindavidn flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT vanrossumalbert flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT lombardimassimo flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT schwitterjuerg flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT schulzmengerjeanette flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements
AT kilnerphilipj flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements