Cargando…
Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements
AIMS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive phase contrast measurements of flow through planes transecting large vessels. However, some clinically valuable applications are highly sensitive to errors caused by small offsets of measured velocities if these are not adequately cor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2818657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20074359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-5 |
_version_ | 1782177277065297920 |
---|---|
author | Gatehouse, Peter D Rolf, Marijn P Graves, Martin J Hofman, Mark BM Totman, John Werner, Beat Quest, Rebecca A Liu, Yingmin von Spiczak, Jochen Dieringer, Matthias Firmin, David N van Rossum, Albert Lombardi, Massimo Schwitter, Juerg Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Kilner, Philip J |
author_facet | Gatehouse, Peter D Rolf, Marijn P Graves, Martin J Hofman, Mark BM Totman, John Werner, Beat Quest, Rebecca A Liu, Yingmin von Spiczak, Jochen Dieringer, Matthias Firmin, David N van Rossum, Albert Lombardi, Massimo Schwitter, Juerg Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Kilner, Philip J |
author_sort | Gatehouse, Peter D |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive phase contrast measurements of flow through planes transecting large vessels. However, some clinically valuable applications are highly sensitive to errors caused by small offsets of measured velocities if these are not adequately corrected, for example by the use of static tissue or static phantom correction of the offset error. We studied the severity of uncorrected velocity offset errors across sites and CMR systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a multi-centre, multi-vendor study, breath-hold through-plane retrospectively ECG-gated phase contrast acquisitions, as are used clinically for aortic and pulmonary flow measurement, were applied to static gelatin phantoms in twelve 1.5 T CMR systems, using a velocity encoding range of 150 cm/s. No post-processing corrections of offsets were implemented. The greatest uncorrected velocity offset, taken as an average over a 'great vessel' region (30 mm diameter) located up to 70 mm in-plane distance from the magnet isocenter, ranged from 0.4 cm/s to 4.9 cm/s. It averaged 2.7 cm/s over all the planes and systems. By theoretical calculation, a velocity offset error of 0.6 cm/s (representing just 0.4% of a 150 cm/s velocity encoding range) is barely acceptable, potentially causing about 5% miscalculation of cardiac output and up to 10% error in shunt measurement. CONCLUSION: In the absence of hardware or software upgrades able to reduce phase offset errors, all the systems tested appeared to require post-acquisition correction to achieve consistently reliable breath-hold measurements of flow. The effectiveness of offset correction software will still need testing with respect to clinical flow acquisitions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2818657 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28186572010-02-10 Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements Gatehouse, Peter D Rolf, Marijn P Graves, Martin J Hofman, Mark BM Totman, John Werner, Beat Quest, Rebecca A Liu, Yingmin von Spiczak, Jochen Dieringer, Matthias Firmin, David N van Rossum, Albert Lombardi, Massimo Schwitter, Juerg Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Kilner, Philip J J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research AIMS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive phase contrast measurements of flow through planes transecting large vessels. However, some clinically valuable applications are highly sensitive to errors caused by small offsets of measured velocities if these are not adequately corrected, for example by the use of static tissue or static phantom correction of the offset error. We studied the severity of uncorrected velocity offset errors across sites and CMR systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a multi-centre, multi-vendor study, breath-hold through-plane retrospectively ECG-gated phase contrast acquisitions, as are used clinically for aortic and pulmonary flow measurement, were applied to static gelatin phantoms in twelve 1.5 T CMR systems, using a velocity encoding range of 150 cm/s. No post-processing corrections of offsets were implemented. The greatest uncorrected velocity offset, taken as an average over a 'great vessel' region (30 mm diameter) located up to 70 mm in-plane distance from the magnet isocenter, ranged from 0.4 cm/s to 4.9 cm/s. It averaged 2.7 cm/s over all the planes and systems. By theoretical calculation, a velocity offset error of 0.6 cm/s (representing just 0.4% of a 150 cm/s velocity encoding range) is barely acceptable, potentially causing about 5% miscalculation of cardiac output and up to 10% error in shunt measurement. CONCLUSION: In the absence of hardware or software upgrades able to reduce phase offset errors, all the systems tested appeared to require post-acquisition correction to achieve consistently reliable breath-hold measurements of flow. The effectiveness of offset correction software will still need testing with respect to clinical flow acquisitions. BioMed Central 2010-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2818657/ /pubmed/20074359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-5 Text en Copyright ©2010 Gatehouse et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Gatehouse, Peter D Rolf, Marijn P Graves, Martin J Hofman, Mark BM Totman, John Werner, Beat Quest, Rebecca A Liu, Yingmin von Spiczak, Jochen Dieringer, Matthias Firmin, David N van Rossum, Albert Lombardi, Massimo Schwitter, Juerg Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Kilner, Philip J Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements |
title | Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements |
title_full | Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements |
title_fullStr | Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements |
title_short | Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements |
title_sort | flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2818657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20074359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gatehousepeterd flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT rolfmarijnp flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT gravesmartinj flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT hofmanmarkbm flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT totmanjohn flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT wernerbeat flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT questrebeccaa flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT liuyingmin flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT vonspiczakjochen flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT dieringermatthias flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT firmindavidn flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT vanrossumalbert flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT lombardimassimo flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT schwitterjuerg flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT schulzmengerjeanette flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements AT kilnerphilipj flowmeasurementbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceamulticentremultivendorstudyofbackgroundphaseoffseterrorsthatcancompromisetheaccuracyofderivedregurgitantorshuntflowmeasurements |