Cargando…
Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration
BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic changes in the liver remnant following partial hepatectomy (PHx) have been suggested to be a primary stimulus in triggering liver regeneration. We hypothesized that it is the increased sinusoidal flow per se and hence the shear-stress stimulus on the endothelial surface withi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20148099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-9-2 |
_version_ | 1782177287469268992 |
---|---|
author | Mortensen, Kim E Conley, Lene N Nygaard, Ingvild Sorenesen, Peter Mortensen, Elin Bendixen, Christian Revhaug, Arthur |
author_facet | Mortensen, Kim E Conley, Lene N Nygaard, Ingvild Sorenesen, Peter Mortensen, Elin Bendixen, Christian Revhaug, Arthur |
author_sort | Mortensen, Kim E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic changes in the liver remnant following partial hepatectomy (PHx) have been suggested to be a primary stimulus in triggering liver regeneration. We hypothesized that it is the increased sinusoidal flow per se and hence the shear-stress stimulus on the endothelial surface within the liver remnant which is the main stimulus to regeneration. In order to test this hypothesis we wanted to increase the sinusoidal flow without performing a concomitant liver resection. Accordingly, we constructed an aorto-portal shunt to the left portal vein branch creating a standardized four-fold increase in flow to segments II, III and IV. The impact of this manipulation was studied in both an acute model (6 animals, 9 hours) using a global porcine cDNA microarray chip and in a chronic model observing weight and histological changes (7 animals, 3 weeks). RESULTS: Gene expression profiling from the shunted segments does not suggest that increased sinusoidal flow per se results in activation of genes promoting mitosis. Hyperperfusion over three weeks results in the whole liver gaining a supranormal weight of 3.9% of the total body weight (versus the normal 2.5%). Contrary to our hypothesis, the weight gain was observed on the non-shunted side without an increase in sinusoidal flow. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated increase in sinusoidal flow does not have the same genetic, microscopic or macroscopic impact on the liver as that seen in the liver remnant after partial hepatectomy, indicating that increased sinusoidal flow may not be a sufficient stimulus in itself for the initiation of liver regeneration. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2819042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28190422010-02-10 Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration Mortensen, Kim E Conley, Lene N Nygaard, Ingvild Sorenesen, Peter Mortensen, Elin Bendixen, Christian Revhaug, Arthur Comp Hepatol Research BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic changes in the liver remnant following partial hepatectomy (PHx) have been suggested to be a primary stimulus in triggering liver regeneration. We hypothesized that it is the increased sinusoidal flow per se and hence the shear-stress stimulus on the endothelial surface within the liver remnant which is the main stimulus to regeneration. In order to test this hypothesis we wanted to increase the sinusoidal flow without performing a concomitant liver resection. Accordingly, we constructed an aorto-portal shunt to the left portal vein branch creating a standardized four-fold increase in flow to segments II, III and IV. The impact of this manipulation was studied in both an acute model (6 animals, 9 hours) using a global porcine cDNA microarray chip and in a chronic model observing weight and histological changes (7 animals, 3 weeks). RESULTS: Gene expression profiling from the shunted segments does not suggest that increased sinusoidal flow per se results in activation of genes promoting mitosis. Hyperperfusion over three weeks results in the whole liver gaining a supranormal weight of 3.9% of the total body weight (versus the normal 2.5%). Contrary to our hypothesis, the weight gain was observed on the non-shunted side without an increase in sinusoidal flow. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated increase in sinusoidal flow does not have the same genetic, microscopic or macroscopic impact on the liver as that seen in the liver remnant after partial hepatectomy, indicating that increased sinusoidal flow may not be a sufficient stimulus in itself for the initiation of liver regeneration. BioMed Central 2010-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2819042/ /pubmed/20148099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-9-2 Text en Copyright ©2010 Mortensen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Mortensen, Kim E Conley, Lene N Nygaard, Ingvild Sorenesen, Peter Mortensen, Elin Bendixen, Christian Revhaug, Arthur Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration |
title | Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration |
title_full | Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration |
title_fullStr | Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration |
title_short | Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration |
title_sort | increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20148099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-9-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mortensenkime increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration AT conleylenen increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration AT nygaardingvild increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration AT sorenesenpeter increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration AT mortensenelin increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration AT bendixenchristian increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration AT revhaugarthur increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration |