Cargando…

Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic changes in the liver remnant following partial hepatectomy (PHx) have been suggested to be a primary stimulus in triggering liver regeneration. We hypothesized that it is the increased sinusoidal flow per se and hence the shear-stress stimulus on the endothelial surface withi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mortensen, Kim E, Conley, Lene N, Nygaard, Ingvild, Sorenesen, Peter, Mortensen, Elin, Bendixen, Christian, Revhaug, Arthur
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20148099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-9-2
_version_ 1782177287469268992
author Mortensen, Kim E
Conley, Lene N
Nygaard, Ingvild
Sorenesen, Peter
Mortensen, Elin
Bendixen, Christian
Revhaug, Arthur
author_facet Mortensen, Kim E
Conley, Lene N
Nygaard, Ingvild
Sorenesen, Peter
Mortensen, Elin
Bendixen, Christian
Revhaug, Arthur
author_sort Mortensen, Kim E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic changes in the liver remnant following partial hepatectomy (PHx) have been suggested to be a primary stimulus in triggering liver regeneration. We hypothesized that it is the increased sinusoidal flow per se and hence the shear-stress stimulus on the endothelial surface within the liver remnant which is the main stimulus to regeneration. In order to test this hypothesis we wanted to increase the sinusoidal flow without performing a concomitant liver resection. Accordingly, we constructed an aorto-portal shunt to the left portal vein branch creating a standardized four-fold increase in flow to segments II, III and IV. The impact of this manipulation was studied in both an acute model (6 animals, 9 hours) using a global porcine cDNA microarray chip and in a chronic model observing weight and histological changes (7 animals, 3 weeks). RESULTS: Gene expression profiling from the shunted segments does not suggest that increased sinusoidal flow per se results in activation of genes promoting mitosis. Hyperperfusion over three weeks results in the whole liver gaining a supranormal weight of 3.9% of the total body weight (versus the normal 2.5%). Contrary to our hypothesis, the weight gain was observed on the non-shunted side without an increase in sinusoidal flow. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated increase in sinusoidal flow does not have the same genetic, microscopic or macroscopic impact on the liver as that seen in the liver remnant after partial hepatectomy, indicating that increased sinusoidal flow may not be a sufficient stimulus in itself for the initiation of liver regeneration.
format Text
id pubmed-2819042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28190422010-02-10 Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration Mortensen, Kim E Conley, Lene N Nygaard, Ingvild Sorenesen, Peter Mortensen, Elin Bendixen, Christian Revhaug, Arthur Comp Hepatol Research BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic changes in the liver remnant following partial hepatectomy (PHx) have been suggested to be a primary stimulus in triggering liver regeneration. We hypothesized that it is the increased sinusoidal flow per se and hence the shear-stress stimulus on the endothelial surface within the liver remnant which is the main stimulus to regeneration. In order to test this hypothesis we wanted to increase the sinusoidal flow without performing a concomitant liver resection. Accordingly, we constructed an aorto-portal shunt to the left portal vein branch creating a standardized four-fold increase in flow to segments II, III and IV. The impact of this manipulation was studied in both an acute model (6 animals, 9 hours) using a global porcine cDNA microarray chip and in a chronic model observing weight and histological changes (7 animals, 3 weeks). RESULTS: Gene expression profiling from the shunted segments does not suggest that increased sinusoidal flow per se results in activation of genes promoting mitosis. Hyperperfusion over three weeks results in the whole liver gaining a supranormal weight of 3.9% of the total body weight (versus the normal 2.5%). Contrary to our hypothesis, the weight gain was observed on the non-shunted side without an increase in sinusoidal flow. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated increase in sinusoidal flow does not have the same genetic, microscopic or macroscopic impact on the liver as that seen in the liver remnant after partial hepatectomy, indicating that increased sinusoidal flow may not be a sufficient stimulus in itself for the initiation of liver regeneration. BioMed Central 2010-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2819042/ /pubmed/20148099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-9-2 Text en Copyright ©2010 Mortensen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mortensen, Kim E
Conley, Lene N
Nygaard, Ingvild
Sorenesen, Peter
Mortensen, Elin
Bendixen, Christian
Revhaug, Arthur
Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration
title Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration
title_full Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration
title_fullStr Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration
title_short Increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration
title_sort increased sinusoidal flow is not the primary stimulus to liver regeneration
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20148099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-9-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mortensenkime increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration
AT conleylenen increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration
AT nygaardingvild increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration
AT sorenesenpeter increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration
AT mortensenelin increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration
AT bendixenchristian increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration
AT revhaugarthur increasedsinusoidalflowisnottheprimarystimulustoliverregeneration