Cargando…

Epidemiological Methods: About Time

Epidemiological studies often produce false positive results due to use of statistical approaches that either ignore or distort time. The three time-related issues of focus in this discussion are: (1) cross-sectional vs. cohort studies, (2) statistical significance vs. public health significance, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kraemer, Helena Chmura
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20195431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7010029
_version_ 1782177308910551040
author Kraemer, Helena Chmura
author_facet Kraemer, Helena Chmura
author_sort Kraemer, Helena Chmura
collection PubMed
description Epidemiological studies often produce false positive results due to use of statistical approaches that either ignore or distort time. The three time-related issues of focus in this discussion are: (1) cross-sectional vs. cohort studies, (2) statistical significance vs. public health significance, and (3), how risk factors “work together” to impact public health significance. The issue of time should be central to all thinking in epidemiology research, affecting sampling, measurement, design, analysis and, perhaps most important, the interpretation of results that might influence clinical and public-health decision-making and subsequent clinical research.
format Text
id pubmed-2819774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28197742010-03-01 Epidemiological Methods: About Time Kraemer, Helena Chmura Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Epidemiological studies often produce false positive results due to use of statistical approaches that either ignore or distort time. The three time-related issues of focus in this discussion are: (1) cross-sectional vs. cohort studies, (2) statistical significance vs. public health significance, and (3), how risk factors “work together” to impact public health significance. The issue of time should be central to all thinking in epidemiology research, affecting sampling, measurement, design, analysis and, perhaps most important, the interpretation of results that might influence clinical and public-health decision-making and subsequent clinical research. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010-01 2009-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2819774/ /pubmed/20195431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7010029 Text en © 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kraemer, Helena Chmura
Epidemiological Methods: About Time
title Epidemiological Methods: About Time
title_full Epidemiological Methods: About Time
title_fullStr Epidemiological Methods: About Time
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological Methods: About Time
title_short Epidemiological Methods: About Time
title_sort epidemiological methods: about time
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20195431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7010029
work_keys_str_mv AT kraemerhelenachmura epidemiologicalmethodsabouttime