Cargando…

A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study

BACKGROUND: Supplementary prescribing for mental health nurses was first introduced in the UK in 2003. Since then, a number of studies have reported stakeholders' perceptions of the success of the initiative. However, there has been little experimental research conducted into its effectiveness....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norman, Ian J, Coster, Samantha, McCrone, Paul, Sibley, Andrew, Whittlesea, Cate
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2820038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20051131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-4
_version_ 1782177341458350080
author Norman, Ian J
Coster, Samantha
McCrone, Paul
Sibley, Andrew
Whittlesea, Cate
author_facet Norman, Ian J
Coster, Samantha
McCrone, Paul
Sibley, Andrew
Whittlesea, Cate
author_sort Norman, Ian J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Supplementary prescribing for mental health nurses was first introduced in the UK in 2003. Since then, a number of studies have reported stakeholders' perceptions of the success of the initiative. However, there has been little experimental research conducted into its effectiveness. This paper reports findings from the first known study to compare the cost and clinical impact of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing to independent medical prescribing. METHODS: A post-test control group experimental design was used to compare the treatment costs, clinical outcomes and satisfaction of patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing with a matched group of patients in receipt of independent prescribing from consultant psychiatrists. The sample comprised 45 patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing for a minimum of six months and a matched group (by age, gender, diagnosis, and chronicity) of patients prescribed for by psychiatrists. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients in the nurse supplementary prescribers' group and the independent prescribers' group in terms of medication adherence, health status, side effects, and satisfaction with overall care. Total costs per patient for service use were £803 higher for the nurse prescribers' group but this difference was not significant (95% confidence interval -£1341 to £3020). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found between the health and social outcomes of patients in the mental health nurse supplementary prescribers' group, and those prescribed for by the independent medical prescribers. The cost appraisal also showed that there was no significant difference in the costs of the two types of prescribing, although the pattern of resources used differed between patients in the two prescriber groups. The results suggest that mental health nurse supplementary prescribers can deliver similar health benefits to patients as consultant psychiatrists without any significant difference in patients' service utilisation costs.
format Text
id pubmed-2820038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28200382010-02-11 A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study Norman, Ian J Coster, Samantha McCrone, Paul Sibley, Andrew Whittlesea, Cate BMC Health Serv Res Research article BACKGROUND: Supplementary prescribing for mental health nurses was first introduced in the UK in 2003. Since then, a number of studies have reported stakeholders' perceptions of the success of the initiative. However, there has been little experimental research conducted into its effectiveness. This paper reports findings from the first known study to compare the cost and clinical impact of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing to independent medical prescribing. METHODS: A post-test control group experimental design was used to compare the treatment costs, clinical outcomes and satisfaction of patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing with a matched group of patients in receipt of independent prescribing from consultant psychiatrists. The sample comprised 45 patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing for a minimum of six months and a matched group (by age, gender, diagnosis, and chronicity) of patients prescribed for by psychiatrists. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients in the nurse supplementary prescribers' group and the independent prescribers' group in terms of medication adherence, health status, side effects, and satisfaction with overall care. Total costs per patient for service use were £803 higher for the nurse prescribers' group but this difference was not significant (95% confidence interval -£1341 to £3020). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found between the health and social outcomes of patients in the mental health nurse supplementary prescribers' group, and those prescribed for by the independent medical prescribers. The cost appraisal also showed that there was no significant difference in the costs of the two types of prescribing, although the pattern of resources used differed between patients in the two prescriber groups. The results suggest that mental health nurse supplementary prescribers can deliver similar health benefits to patients as consultant psychiatrists without any significant difference in patients' service utilisation costs. BioMed Central 2010-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2820038/ /pubmed/20051131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-4 Text en Copyright ©2010 Norman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Norman, Ian J
Coster, Samantha
McCrone, Paul
Sibley, Andrew
Whittlesea, Cate
A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
title A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
title_full A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
title_fullStr A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
title_short A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
title_sort comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2820038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20051131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-4
work_keys_str_mv AT normanianj acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT costersamantha acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT mccronepaul acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT sibleyandrew acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT whittleseacate acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT normanianj comparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT costersamantha comparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT mccronepaul comparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT sibleyandrew comparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy
AT whittleseacate comparisonoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcostsofmentalhealthnursesupplementaryprescribingandindependentmedicalprescribingaposttestcontrolgroupstudy