Cargando…

F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection

PURPOSE: To assess the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) combined with CT in critically ill patients suspected of having an infection. METHODS: FDG-PET CT scans requested for evaluation of a suspected infection or inflammatory process in critically ill, mechanic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simons, Koen S., Pickkers, Peter, Bleeker-Rovers, Chantal P., Oyen, Wim J. G., van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2820225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19847397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1697-8
_version_ 1782177353161506816
author Simons, Koen S.
Pickkers, Peter
Bleeker-Rovers, Chantal P.
Oyen, Wim J. G.
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
author_facet Simons, Koen S.
Pickkers, Peter
Bleeker-Rovers, Chantal P.
Oyen, Wim J. G.
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
author_sort Simons, Koen S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) combined with CT in critically ill patients suspected of having an infection. METHODS: FDG-PET CT scans requested for evaluation of a suspected infection or inflammatory process in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients were analyzed (blinded for the final clinical diagnosis) and compared with clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-five FDG-PET/CT scans performed in 33 ICU patients (28 adults and 5 children), median age 58 years (range 1 month–72 years), were analyzed. Twenty-one FDG-PET/CT scans were true positive. Three FDG-PET/CT scans were considered false positive, in one case leading to additional diagnostic procedures (specificity 79%). Additionally, 11 true negatives were found (sensitivity 100%), leading to an overall accuracy of 91%. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT scanning is of additional value in the evaluation of suspected infection in critically ill patients in whom conventional diagnostics did not lead to a diagnosis. Apart from the high accuracy, in this study it appeared that, in addition to conventional diagnostic techniques that were routinely performed, a normal FDG-PET/CT ruled out important infections requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy or drainage. Since sensitivity is lower in highly metabolic active tissues (e.g., endocarditis, meningitis), the FDG-PET/CT scan is not suited to detect infections in these tissues.
format Text
id pubmed-2820225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28202252010-02-18 F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection Simons, Koen S. Pickkers, Peter Bleeker-Rovers, Chantal P. Oyen, Wim J. G. van der Hoeven, Johannes G. Intensive Care Med Original PURPOSE: To assess the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) combined with CT in critically ill patients suspected of having an infection. METHODS: FDG-PET CT scans requested for evaluation of a suspected infection or inflammatory process in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients were analyzed (blinded for the final clinical diagnosis) and compared with clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-five FDG-PET/CT scans performed in 33 ICU patients (28 adults and 5 children), median age 58 years (range 1 month–72 years), were analyzed. Twenty-one FDG-PET/CT scans were true positive. Three FDG-PET/CT scans were considered false positive, in one case leading to additional diagnostic procedures (specificity 79%). Additionally, 11 true negatives were found (sensitivity 100%), leading to an overall accuracy of 91%. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT scanning is of additional value in the evaluation of suspected infection in critically ill patients in whom conventional diagnostics did not lead to a diagnosis. Apart from the high accuracy, in this study it appeared that, in addition to conventional diagnostic techniques that were routinely performed, a normal FDG-PET/CT ruled out important infections requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy or drainage. Since sensitivity is lower in highly metabolic active tissues (e.g., endocarditis, meningitis), the FDG-PET/CT scan is not suited to detect infections in these tissues. Springer-Verlag 2009-10-22 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2820225/ /pubmed/19847397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1697-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original
Simons, Koen S.
Pickkers, Peter
Bleeker-Rovers, Chantal P.
Oyen, Wim J. G.
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection
title F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection
title_full F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection
title_fullStr F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection
title_full_unstemmed F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection
title_short F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection
title_sort f-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with ct in critically ill patients with suspected infection
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2820225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19847397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1697-8
work_keys_str_mv AT simonskoens f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycombinedwithctincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinfection
AT pickkerspeter f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycombinedwithctincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinfection
AT bleekerroverschantalp f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycombinedwithctincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinfection
AT oyenwimjg f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycombinedwithctincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinfection
AT vanderhoevenjohannesg f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycombinedwithctincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinfection