Cargando…

Neurocognitive outcomes of individuals with a sex chromosome trisomy: XXX, XYY, or XXY: a systematic review*

AIM: To review systematically the neurodevelopmental characteristics of individuals with sex chromosome trisomies (SCTs). METHOD: A bibliographic search identified English-language articles on SCTs. The focus was on studies unbiased by clinical referral, with power of at least 0.69 to detect an effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LEGGETT, VICTORIA, JACOBS, PATRICIA, NATION, KATE, SCERIF, GAIA, BISHOP, DOROTHY V M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2820350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20059514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03545.x
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To review systematically the neurodevelopmental characteristics of individuals with sex chromosome trisomies (SCTs). METHOD: A bibliographic search identified English-language articles on SCTs. The focus was on studies unbiased by clinical referral, with power of at least 0.69 to detect an effect size of 1.0. RESULTS: We identified 35 articles on five neonatally identified samples that had adequate power for our review. An additional 11 studies were included where cases had been identified for reasons other than neurodevelopmental concerns. Individuals with an additional X chromosome had mean IQs that were within broadly normal limits but lower than the respective comparison groups, with verbal IQ most affected. Cognitive outcomes were poorest for females with XXX. Males with XYY had normal-range IQs, but all three SCT groups (XXX, XXY, and XYY) had marked difficulties in speech and language, motor skills, and educational achievement. Nevertheless, most adults with SCTs lived independently. Less evidence was available for brain structure and for attention, social, and psychiatric outcomes. Within each group there was much variation. INTERPRETATION: Individuals with SCTs are at risk of cognitive and behavioural difficulties. However, the evidence base is slender, and further research is needed to ascertain the nature, severity, and causes of these difficulties in unselected samples.