Cargando…

A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients

BACKGROUND: Enteric protozoa and sporozoa have emerged as important opportunistic parasites and can cause fatal infections in AIDS patients. The line of treatment being different for them necessitates an accurate and prompt identification of these to avoid empirical treatment. In this study which is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuli, Lekha, Singh, Deepak K, Gulati, Anil K, Sundar, Shyam, Mohapatra, Tribhuban M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2820438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-11
_version_ 1782177368688820224
author Tuli, Lekha
Singh, Deepak K
Gulati, Anil K
Sundar, Shyam
Mohapatra, Tribhuban M
author_facet Tuli, Lekha
Singh, Deepak K
Gulati, Anil K
Sundar, Shyam
Mohapatra, Tribhuban M
author_sort Tuli, Lekha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enteric protozoa and sporozoa have emerged as important opportunistic parasites and can cause fatal infections in AIDS patients. The line of treatment being different for them necessitates an accurate and prompt identification of these to avoid empirical treatment. In this study which is the first of its kind from India we did a comprehensive evaluation of different techniques, comparing them on the basis of the attributes like yield, cost, time taken, expertise and infrastructure. For the first time combination of Calcoflour White and DAPI, a nuclear stain, were used to identify Microsporidia spp. Thus, a diagnostic protocol was devised for rapid, sensitive and cost effective identification of the opportunistic enteric protozoa. RESULTS: The organisms isolated from the stool samples of the cases (450 HIV patients) were predominantly Cryptosporidium spp., Microsporidia spp. and Cyclospora spp. Interestingly, the control group (200 relatives of the patients who were HIV negative) showed a high incidence (21%) of Cryptosporidium spp. We found a significant increase in the sensitivity of microscopy in detecting Cryptosporidium spp. and Cyclospora spp. after formol ether concentration. Kinyoun's staining was better compared to Modified safranin staining for Cryptosporidium spp. identification. Although ELISA had a sensitivity of 93.25% and specificity of 97% for Cryptosporidium spp. detection, we ranked Kinyoun's staining better than ELISA because it is not affordable to most of our patients. For detecting Cyclospora cayetanensis, autoflourescence was the easiest and most cost effective method followed by Safranin technique. Combination of Calcoflour White stain and DAPI gave good results for the identification of Microsporidia spp. We assessed the above techniques and graded the attributes in the following descending order: cost effectiveness, sensitivity, ease of use and interpretation, time taken for the procedure and batch testing. CONCLUSION: Thus, we conclude that a combination of minimum three procedures should be carried out for the screening of stool specimens of HIV positive patients. Kinyoun's staining should be made mandatory for every diarrheal stool sample from HIV patients. Also every laboratory should assign its own value to the attributes and apply Multiattribute utility theory or the Analytical hierarchy process to decide the most appropriate methodology.
format Text
id pubmed-2820438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28204382010-02-12 A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients Tuli, Lekha Singh, Deepak K Gulati, Anil K Sundar, Shyam Mohapatra, Tribhuban M BMC Microbiol Research article BACKGROUND: Enteric protozoa and sporozoa have emerged as important opportunistic parasites and can cause fatal infections in AIDS patients. The line of treatment being different for them necessitates an accurate and prompt identification of these to avoid empirical treatment. In this study which is the first of its kind from India we did a comprehensive evaluation of different techniques, comparing them on the basis of the attributes like yield, cost, time taken, expertise and infrastructure. For the first time combination of Calcoflour White and DAPI, a nuclear stain, were used to identify Microsporidia spp. Thus, a diagnostic protocol was devised for rapid, sensitive and cost effective identification of the opportunistic enteric protozoa. RESULTS: The organisms isolated from the stool samples of the cases (450 HIV patients) were predominantly Cryptosporidium spp., Microsporidia spp. and Cyclospora spp. Interestingly, the control group (200 relatives of the patients who were HIV negative) showed a high incidence (21%) of Cryptosporidium spp. We found a significant increase in the sensitivity of microscopy in detecting Cryptosporidium spp. and Cyclospora spp. after formol ether concentration. Kinyoun's staining was better compared to Modified safranin staining for Cryptosporidium spp. identification. Although ELISA had a sensitivity of 93.25% and specificity of 97% for Cryptosporidium spp. detection, we ranked Kinyoun's staining better than ELISA because it is not affordable to most of our patients. For detecting Cyclospora cayetanensis, autoflourescence was the easiest and most cost effective method followed by Safranin technique. Combination of Calcoflour White stain and DAPI gave good results for the identification of Microsporidia spp. We assessed the above techniques and graded the attributes in the following descending order: cost effectiveness, sensitivity, ease of use and interpretation, time taken for the procedure and batch testing. CONCLUSION: Thus, we conclude that a combination of minimum three procedures should be carried out for the screening of stool specimens of HIV positive patients. Kinyoun's staining should be made mandatory for every diarrheal stool sample from HIV patients. Also every laboratory should assign its own value to the attributes and apply Multiattribute utility theory or the Analytical hierarchy process to decide the most appropriate methodology. BioMed Central 2010-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2820438/ /pubmed/20078872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-11 Text en Copyright ©2010 Tuli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Tuli, Lekha
Singh, Deepak K
Gulati, Anil K
Sundar, Shyam
Mohapatra, Tribhuban M
A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients
title A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients
title_full A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients
title_fullStr A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients
title_full_unstemmed A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients
title_short A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients
title_sort multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in aids patients
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2820438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-11
work_keys_str_mv AT tulilekha amultiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT singhdeepakk amultiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT gulatianilk amultiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT sundarshyam amultiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT mohapatratribhubanm amultiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT tulilekha multiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT singhdeepakk multiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT gulatianilk multiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT sundarshyam multiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients
AT mohapatratribhubanm multiattributeutilityevaluationofdifferentmethodsforthedetectionofentericprotozoacausingdiarrheainaidspatients