Cargando…

Another look at Emergency Department HIV screening in practice: no need to revise expectations

BACKGROUND: A recent study reported a lower than expected specificity and positive predictive value of the rapid oral HIV test in the setting of routine emergency department (ED) screening. These results appeared inconsistent with the findings in another urban Emergency Department during the same ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Jeremy, Magnus, Manya, Czarnogosrki, Maggie, Lee, Vanessa
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20051116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-7-1
_version_ 1782177428221722624
author Brown, Jeremy
Magnus, Manya
Czarnogosrki, Maggie
Lee, Vanessa
author_facet Brown, Jeremy
Magnus, Manya
Czarnogosrki, Maggie
Lee, Vanessa
author_sort Brown, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recent study reported a lower than expected specificity and positive predictive value of the rapid oral HIV test in the setting of routine emergency department (ED) screening. These results appeared inconsistent with the findings in another urban Emergency Department during the same time period. OBJECTIVE: To compare the specificity and positive predictive vale (PPV) of an oral rapid HIV test used in an ED screening program in Washington DC with that performed in the USHER clinical trial. DESIGN: Period cross-sectional analysis of rapid oral HIV testing conducted in an ongoing HIV screening program emergency department patients. SETTING: The George Washington University Emergency Department (Washington DC) from 7 February to 1 October 2007. PATIENTS: 1,560 adults seen in the ED for non-HIV-related presenting complaints, who participated in the HIV screening program. INTERVENTION: Rapid HIV testing with the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test (OraSure Technologies, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania). Patients with reactive rapid test results were offered Western blot testing for confirmation. MEASUREMENTS: Specificity and positive predictive value for the program were determined. Findings were compared to those found in the USHER trial. RESULTS: Of 1,560 patients screened for HIV, 13 [0.8%, 95% CI 0.38% to 1.28%] had a reactive HIV screening test, and all were confirmed to be positive by Western Blot. The specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.6%-100%). LIMITATION: Since non-reactive tests were not confirmed, the test sensitivity cannot be determined. CONCLUSION: Review of our data conflict with findings from the USHER study surrounding false positive OraQuick HIV screening. Our data suggest that rapid HIV screening protocols implemented in EDs outside of the clinical trial paradigm perform effectively without an excess of false positive results. Compared with other screening tests, HIV rapid screening should remain an essential component of ED practice.
format Text
id pubmed-2821359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28213592010-02-15 Another look at Emergency Department HIV screening in practice: no need to revise expectations Brown, Jeremy Magnus, Manya Czarnogosrki, Maggie Lee, Vanessa AIDS Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: A recent study reported a lower than expected specificity and positive predictive value of the rapid oral HIV test in the setting of routine emergency department (ED) screening. These results appeared inconsistent with the findings in another urban Emergency Department during the same time period. OBJECTIVE: To compare the specificity and positive predictive vale (PPV) of an oral rapid HIV test used in an ED screening program in Washington DC with that performed in the USHER clinical trial. DESIGN: Period cross-sectional analysis of rapid oral HIV testing conducted in an ongoing HIV screening program emergency department patients. SETTING: The George Washington University Emergency Department (Washington DC) from 7 February to 1 October 2007. PATIENTS: 1,560 adults seen in the ED for non-HIV-related presenting complaints, who participated in the HIV screening program. INTERVENTION: Rapid HIV testing with the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test (OraSure Technologies, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania). Patients with reactive rapid test results were offered Western blot testing for confirmation. MEASUREMENTS: Specificity and positive predictive value for the program were determined. Findings were compared to those found in the USHER trial. RESULTS: Of 1,560 patients screened for HIV, 13 [0.8%, 95% CI 0.38% to 1.28%] had a reactive HIV screening test, and all were confirmed to be positive by Western Blot. The specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.6%-100%). LIMITATION: Since non-reactive tests were not confirmed, the test sensitivity cannot be determined. CONCLUSION: Review of our data conflict with findings from the USHER study surrounding false positive OraQuick HIV screening. Our data suggest that rapid HIV screening protocols implemented in EDs outside of the clinical trial paradigm perform effectively without an excess of false positive results. Compared with other screening tests, HIV rapid screening should remain an essential component of ED practice. BioMed Central 2010-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2821359/ /pubmed/20051116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-7-1 Text en Copyright ©2010 Brown et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Brown, Jeremy
Magnus, Manya
Czarnogosrki, Maggie
Lee, Vanessa
Another look at Emergency Department HIV screening in practice: no need to revise expectations
title Another look at Emergency Department HIV screening in practice: no need to revise expectations
title_full Another look at Emergency Department HIV screening in practice: no need to revise expectations
title_fullStr Another look at Emergency Department HIV screening in practice: no need to revise expectations
title_full_unstemmed Another look at Emergency Department HIV screening in practice: no need to revise expectations
title_short Another look at Emergency Department HIV screening in practice: no need to revise expectations
title_sort another look at emergency department hiv screening in practice: no need to revise expectations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20051116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-7-1
work_keys_str_mv AT brownjeremy anotherlookatemergencydepartmenthivscreeninginpracticenoneedtoreviseexpectations
AT magnusmanya anotherlookatemergencydepartmenthivscreeninginpracticenoneedtoreviseexpectations
AT czarnogosrkimaggie anotherlookatemergencydepartmenthivscreeninginpracticenoneedtoreviseexpectations
AT leevanessa anotherlookatemergencydepartmenthivscreeninginpracticenoneedtoreviseexpectations