Cargando…

Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework

BACKGROUND: There is considerable expertise in the obesity field in identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence to develop guidelines and recommendations for policy and practice. The recommendations, while based on evidence, are not formulated in a way that readily leads to implementation. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poobalan, Amudha S, Aucott, Lorna S, Ahmed, Sheraz, Smith, W Cairns S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-17
_version_ 1782177428710359040
author Poobalan, Amudha S
Aucott, Lorna S
Ahmed, Sheraz
Smith, W Cairns S
author_facet Poobalan, Amudha S
Aucott, Lorna S
Ahmed, Sheraz
Smith, W Cairns S
author_sort Poobalan, Amudha S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is considerable expertise in the obesity field in identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence to develop guidelines and recommendations for policy and practice. The recommendations, while based on evidence, are not formulated in a way that readily leads to implementation. This paper analyses the recent UK recommendations on obesity using a proposed implementation framework. METHODS: Two bibliographic databases (Medline and Embase) and various health related and government websites were systematically searched for obesity recommendations published between 1996 and 2007. All the documents published on recommendations for either prevention or treatment of obesity in the UK were assessed. A proposed implementation framework was developed for the purpose of this review. All the UK recommendations were critically appraised and results summarised according to the criteria used within the framework. Cross-country applicability of the proposed framework was assessed using the Swedish policy recommendations on obesity. RESULTS: Most recommendations on obesity while demonstrating their basis in evidence, fail to meet the implementation standards. They tend to be non-specific in identifying who is responsible for implementation and monitoring, and often no timescale is indicated. The costs of implementation are rarely estimated and those responsible for such funding are not specified. There are some notable exemptions to the general pattern emanating from more operational and locally based groups. The Swedish policy details 79 proposals with responsibility clearly identified and costs are presented for 20 of them. This policy satisfied most of the framework criteria but failed to give details on evaluation, monitoring and the timeframe for implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Public health has developed skills in appraising evidence and formulating recommendations based on appropriate evidence but these are often not implemented. Different skills are required to translate these recommendations into actions. Public health clearly needs to develop the implementation skills to a level comparable to the ability to synthesise evidence.
format Text
id pubmed-2821361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28213612010-02-15 Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework Poobalan, Amudha S Aucott, Lorna S Ahmed, Sheraz Smith, W Cairns S BMC Public Health Research article BACKGROUND: There is considerable expertise in the obesity field in identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence to develop guidelines and recommendations for policy and practice. The recommendations, while based on evidence, are not formulated in a way that readily leads to implementation. This paper analyses the recent UK recommendations on obesity using a proposed implementation framework. METHODS: Two bibliographic databases (Medline and Embase) and various health related and government websites were systematically searched for obesity recommendations published between 1996 and 2007. All the documents published on recommendations for either prevention or treatment of obesity in the UK were assessed. A proposed implementation framework was developed for the purpose of this review. All the UK recommendations were critically appraised and results summarised according to the criteria used within the framework. Cross-country applicability of the proposed framework was assessed using the Swedish policy recommendations on obesity. RESULTS: Most recommendations on obesity while demonstrating their basis in evidence, fail to meet the implementation standards. They tend to be non-specific in identifying who is responsible for implementation and monitoring, and often no timescale is indicated. The costs of implementation are rarely estimated and those responsible for such funding are not specified. There are some notable exemptions to the general pattern emanating from more operational and locally based groups. The Swedish policy details 79 proposals with responsibility clearly identified and costs are presented for 20 of them. This policy satisfied most of the framework criteria but failed to give details on evaluation, monitoring and the timeframe for implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Public health has developed skills in appraising evidence and formulating recommendations based on appropriate evidence but these are often not implemented. Different skills are required to translate these recommendations into actions. Public health clearly needs to develop the implementation skills to a level comparable to the ability to synthesise evidence. BioMed Central 2010-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2821361/ /pubmed/20078858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-17 Text en Copyright ©2010 Poobalan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Poobalan, Amudha S
Aucott, Lorna S
Ahmed, Sheraz
Smith, W Cairns S
Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework
title Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework
title_full Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework
title_fullStr Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework
title_short Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework
title_sort analysis of the uk recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-17
work_keys_str_mv AT poobalanamudhas analysisoftheukrecommendationsonobesitybasedonaproposedimplementationframework
AT aucottlornas analysisoftheukrecommendationsonobesitybasedonaproposedimplementationframework
AT ahmedsheraz analysisoftheukrecommendationsonobesitybasedonaproposedimplementationframework
AT smithwcairnss analysisoftheukrecommendationsonobesitybasedonaproposedimplementationframework