Cargando…
Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago
BACKGROUND: One of the disadvantages of the Impact Factor (IF) is self-citation. The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator excludes self-citations and considers the quality, rather than absolute numbers, of citations of a journal by other journals. The present study re-evaluated the influence of self...
Autores principales: | Siebelt, Michiel, Siebelt, Teun, Pilot, Peter, Bloem, Rolf M, Bhandari, Mohit, Poolman, Rudolf W |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
por: Poolman, Rudolf W, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
The impact of translational orthopaedic research: Journal of Orthopaedic Translation indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded
por: Qin, Ling, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The SCImago Journal & Country Rank and the JBRA
por: de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Journal Impact Factor of Orthopaedic Journals Does not Predict Individual Paper Citation Rate
por: Bozzo, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of published orthopaedic trauma trials following registration in Clinicaltrials.gov
por: Gandhi, Rajiv, et al.
Publicado: (2011)