Cargando…
A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks
This study aims to quantify the separate contributions of muscle force feedback, muscle spindle activity and co-contraction to the performance of voluntary tasks (“reduce the influence of perturbations on maintained force or position”). Most human motion control studies either isolate only one contr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19714322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1985-0 |
_version_ | 1782177450016374784 |
---|---|
author | Mugge, Winfred Abbink, David A. Schouten, Alfred C. Dewald, Julius P. A. van der Helm, Frans C. T. |
author_facet | Mugge, Winfred Abbink, David A. Schouten, Alfred C. Dewald, Julius P. A. van der Helm, Frans C. T. |
author_sort | Mugge, Winfred |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aims to quantify the separate contributions of muscle force feedback, muscle spindle activity and co-contraction to the performance of voluntary tasks (“reduce the influence of perturbations on maintained force or position”). Most human motion control studies either isolate only one contributor, or assume that relevant reflexive feedback pathways during voluntary disturbance rejection tasks originate mainly from the muscle spindle. Human ankle-control experiments were performed, using three task instructions and three perturbation characteristics to evoke a wide range of responses to force perturbations. During position tasks, subjects (n = 10) resisted the perturbations, becoming more stiff than when being relaxed (i.e., the relax task). During force tasks, subjects were instructed to minimize force changes and actively gave way to imposed forces, thus becoming more compliant than during relax tasks. Subsequently, linear physiological models were fitted to the experimental data. Inhibitory, as well as excitatory force feedback, was needed to account for the full range of measured experimental behaviors. In conclusion, force feedback plays an important role in the studied motion control tasks (excitatory during position tasks and inhibitory during force tasks), implying that spindle-mediated feedback is not the only significant adaptive system that contributes to the maintenance of posture or force. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2821582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28215822010-02-18 A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks Mugge, Winfred Abbink, David A. Schouten, Alfred C. Dewald, Julius P. A. van der Helm, Frans C. T. Exp Brain Res Research Article This study aims to quantify the separate contributions of muscle force feedback, muscle spindle activity and co-contraction to the performance of voluntary tasks (“reduce the influence of perturbations on maintained force or position”). Most human motion control studies either isolate only one contributor, or assume that relevant reflexive feedback pathways during voluntary disturbance rejection tasks originate mainly from the muscle spindle. Human ankle-control experiments were performed, using three task instructions and three perturbation characteristics to evoke a wide range of responses to force perturbations. During position tasks, subjects (n = 10) resisted the perturbations, becoming more stiff than when being relaxed (i.e., the relax task). During force tasks, subjects were instructed to minimize force changes and actively gave way to imposed forces, thus becoming more compliant than during relax tasks. Subsequently, linear physiological models were fitted to the experimental data. Inhibitory, as well as excitatory force feedback, was needed to account for the full range of measured experimental behaviors. In conclusion, force feedback plays an important role in the studied motion control tasks (excitatory during position tasks and inhibitory during force tasks), implying that spindle-mediated feedback is not the only significant adaptive system that contributes to the maintenance of posture or force. Springer-Verlag 2009-08-28 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2821582/ /pubmed/19714322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1985-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mugge, Winfred Abbink, David A. Schouten, Alfred C. Dewald, Julius P. A. van der Helm, Frans C. T. A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks |
title | A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks |
title_full | A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks |
title_fullStr | A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks |
title_short | A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks |
title_sort | rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19714322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1985-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muggewinfred arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT abbinkdavida arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT schoutenalfredc arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT dewaldjuliuspa arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT vanderhelmfransct arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT muggewinfred rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT abbinkdavida rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT schoutenalfredc rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT dewaldjuliuspa rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks AT vanderhelmfransct rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks |