Cargando…

A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks

This study aims to quantify the separate contributions of muscle force feedback, muscle spindle activity and co-contraction to the performance of voluntary tasks (“reduce the influence of perturbations on maintained force or position”). Most human motion control studies either isolate only one contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mugge, Winfred, Abbink, David A., Schouten, Alfred C., Dewald, Julius P. A., van der Helm, Frans C. T.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19714322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1985-0
_version_ 1782177450016374784
author Mugge, Winfred
Abbink, David A.
Schouten, Alfred C.
Dewald, Julius P. A.
van der Helm, Frans C. T.
author_facet Mugge, Winfred
Abbink, David A.
Schouten, Alfred C.
Dewald, Julius P. A.
van der Helm, Frans C. T.
author_sort Mugge, Winfred
collection PubMed
description This study aims to quantify the separate contributions of muscle force feedback, muscle spindle activity and co-contraction to the performance of voluntary tasks (“reduce the influence of perturbations on maintained force or position”). Most human motion control studies either isolate only one contributor, or assume that relevant reflexive feedback pathways during voluntary disturbance rejection tasks originate mainly from the muscle spindle. Human ankle-control experiments were performed, using three task instructions and three perturbation characteristics to evoke a wide range of responses to force perturbations. During position tasks, subjects (n = 10) resisted the perturbations, becoming more stiff than when being relaxed (i.e., the relax task). During force tasks, subjects were instructed to minimize force changes and actively gave way to imposed forces, thus becoming more compliant than during relax tasks. Subsequently, linear physiological models were fitted to the experimental data. Inhibitory, as well as excitatory force feedback, was needed to account for the full range of measured experimental behaviors. In conclusion, force feedback plays an important role in the studied motion control tasks (excitatory during position tasks and inhibitory during force tasks), implying that spindle-mediated feedback is not the only significant adaptive system that contributes to the maintenance of posture or force.
format Text
id pubmed-2821582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28215822010-02-18 A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks Mugge, Winfred Abbink, David A. Schouten, Alfred C. Dewald, Julius P. A. van der Helm, Frans C. T. Exp Brain Res Research Article This study aims to quantify the separate contributions of muscle force feedback, muscle spindle activity and co-contraction to the performance of voluntary tasks (“reduce the influence of perturbations on maintained force or position”). Most human motion control studies either isolate only one contributor, or assume that relevant reflexive feedback pathways during voluntary disturbance rejection tasks originate mainly from the muscle spindle. Human ankle-control experiments were performed, using three task instructions and three perturbation characteristics to evoke a wide range of responses to force perturbations. During position tasks, subjects (n = 10) resisted the perturbations, becoming more stiff than when being relaxed (i.e., the relax task). During force tasks, subjects were instructed to minimize force changes and actively gave way to imposed forces, thus becoming more compliant than during relax tasks. Subsequently, linear physiological models were fitted to the experimental data. Inhibitory, as well as excitatory force feedback, was needed to account for the full range of measured experimental behaviors. In conclusion, force feedback plays an important role in the studied motion control tasks (excitatory during position tasks and inhibitory during force tasks), implying that spindle-mediated feedback is not the only significant adaptive system that contributes to the maintenance of posture or force. Springer-Verlag 2009-08-28 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2821582/ /pubmed/19714322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1985-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mugge, Winfred
Abbink, David A.
Schouten, Alfred C.
Dewald, Julius P. A.
van der Helm, Frans C. T.
A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks
title A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks
title_full A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks
title_fullStr A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks
title_full_unstemmed A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks
title_short A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks
title_sort rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19714322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1985-0
work_keys_str_mv AT muggewinfred arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT abbinkdavida arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT schoutenalfredc arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT dewaldjuliuspa arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT vanderhelmfransct arigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT muggewinfred rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT abbinkdavida rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT schoutenalfredc rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT dewaldjuliuspa rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks
AT vanderhelmfransct rigorousmodelofreflexfunctionindicatesthatpositionandforcefeedbackareflexiblytunedtopositionandforcetasks