Cargando…

Analyzing Adherence to Prenatal Supplement: Does Pill Count Measure Up?

Objective. To determine if adherence as measured by pill count would show a significant association with serum-based measures of adherence. Methods. Data were obtained from a prenatal vitamin D supplementation trial where subjects were stratified by race and randomized into three dosing groups: 400...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Appelgren, Kristie E., Nietert, Paul J., Hulsey, Thomas C., Hollis, Bruce W., Wagner, Carol L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20169132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/631971
_version_ 1782177460293468160
author Appelgren, Kristie E.
Nietert, Paul J.
Hulsey, Thomas C.
Hollis, Bruce W.
Wagner, Carol L.
author_facet Appelgren, Kristie E.
Nietert, Paul J.
Hulsey, Thomas C.
Hollis, Bruce W.
Wagner, Carol L.
author_sort Appelgren, Kristie E.
collection PubMed
description Objective. To determine if adherence as measured by pill count would show a significant association with serum-based measures of adherence. Methods. Data were obtained from a prenatal vitamin D supplementation trial where subjects were stratified by race and randomized into three dosing groups: 400 (control), 2000, or 4000 IU vitamin D(3)/day. One measurement of adherence was obtained via pill counts remaining compared to a novel definition for adherence using serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OH-D) levels (absolute change in 25(OH)D over the study period and the subject's steady-state variation in their 25(OH)D levels). A multivariate logistic regression model examined whether mean percent adherence by pill count was significantly associated with the adherence measure by serum metabolite levels. Results. Subjects' mean percentage of adherence by pill count was not a significant predictor of adherence by serum metabolite levels. This finding was robust across a series of sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. Based on our novel definition of adherence, pill count was not a reliable predictor of adherence to protocol, and calls into question how adherence is measured in clinical research. Our findings have implications regarding the determination of efficacy of medications under study and offer an alternative approach to measuring adherence of long half-life supplements/medications.
format Text
id pubmed-2821652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28216522010-02-18 Analyzing Adherence to Prenatal Supplement: Does Pill Count Measure Up? Appelgren, Kristie E. Nietert, Paul J. Hulsey, Thomas C. Hollis, Bruce W. Wagner, Carol L. Int J Endocrinol Research Article Objective. To determine if adherence as measured by pill count would show a significant association with serum-based measures of adherence. Methods. Data were obtained from a prenatal vitamin D supplementation trial where subjects were stratified by race and randomized into three dosing groups: 400 (control), 2000, or 4000 IU vitamin D(3)/day. One measurement of adherence was obtained via pill counts remaining compared to a novel definition for adherence using serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OH-D) levels (absolute change in 25(OH)D over the study period and the subject's steady-state variation in their 25(OH)D levels). A multivariate logistic regression model examined whether mean percent adherence by pill count was significantly associated with the adherence measure by serum metabolite levels. Results. Subjects' mean percentage of adherence by pill count was not a significant predictor of adherence by serum metabolite levels. This finding was robust across a series of sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. Based on our novel definition of adherence, pill count was not a reliable predictor of adherence to protocol, and calls into question how adherence is measured in clinical research. Our findings have implications regarding the determination of efficacy of medications under study and offer an alternative approach to measuring adherence of long half-life supplements/medications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2821652/ /pubmed/20169132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/631971 Text en Copyright © 2010 Kristie E. Appelgren et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Appelgren, Kristie E.
Nietert, Paul J.
Hulsey, Thomas C.
Hollis, Bruce W.
Wagner, Carol L.
Analyzing Adherence to Prenatal Supplement: Does Pill Count Measure Up?
title Analyzing Adherence to Prenatal Supplement: Does Pill Count Measure Up?
title_full Analyzing Adherence to Prenatal Supplement: Does Pill Count Measure Up?
title_fullStr Analyzing Adherence to Prenatal Supplement: Does Pill Count Measure Up?
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing Adherence to Prenatal Supplement: Does Pill Count Measure Up?
title_short Analyzing Adherence to Prenatal Supplement: Does Pill Count Measure Up?
title_sort analyzing adherence to prenatal supplement: does pill count measure up?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20169132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/631971
work_keys_str_mv AT appelgrenkristiee analyzingadherencetoprenatalsupplementdoespillcountmeasureup
AT nietertpaulj analyzingadherencetoprenatalsupplementdoespillcountmeasureup
AT hulseythomasc analyzingadherencetoprenatalsupplementdoespillcountmeasureup
AT hollisbrucew analyzingadherencetoprenatalsupplementdoespillcountmeasureup
AT wagnercaroll analyzingadherencetoprenatalsupplementdoespillcountmeasureup