Cargando…

Comparing Models of Evolution for Ordered and Disordered Proteins

Most models of protein evolution are based upon proteins that form relatively rigid 3D structures. A significant fraction of proteins, the so-called disordered proteins, do not form rigid 3D structures and sample a broad conformational ensemble. Disordered proteins do not typically maintain long-ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Celeste J., Johnson, Audra K., Daughdrill, Gary W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2822292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19923193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp277
_version_ 1782177515710709760
author Brown, Celeste J.
Johnson, Audra K.
Daughdrill, Gary W.
author_facet Brown, Celeste J.
Johnson, Audra K.
Daughdrill, Gary W.
author_sort Brown, Celeste J.
collection PubMed
description Most models of protein evolution are based upon proteins that form relatively rigid 3D structures. A significant fraction of proteins, the so-called disordered proteins, do not form rigid 3D structures and sample a broad conformational ensemble. Disordered proteins do not typically maintain long-range interactions, so the constraints on their evolution should be different than ordered proteins. To test this hypothesis, we developed and compared models of evolution for disordered and ordered proteins. Substitution matrices were constructed using the sequences of putative homologs for sets of experimentally characterized disordered and ordered proteins. Separate matrices, at three levels of sequence similarity (>85%, 85–60%, and 60–40%), were inferred for each type of protein structure. The substitution matrices for disordered and ordered proteins differed significantly at each level of sequence similarity. The disordered matrices reflected a greater likelihood of evolutionary changes, relative to the ordered matrices, and these changes involved nonconservative substitutions. Glutamic acid and asparagine were interesting exceptions to this result. Important differences between the substitutions that are accepted in disordered proteins relative to ordered proteins were also identified. In general, disordered proteins have fewer evolutionary constraints than ordered proteins. However, some residues like tryptophan and tyrosine are highly conserved in disordered proteins. This is due to their important role in forming protein–protein interfaces. Finally, the amino acid frequencies for disordered proteins, computed during the development of the matrices, were compared with amino acid frequencies for different categories of secondary structure in ordered proteins. The highest correlations were observed between the amino acid frequencies in disordered proteins and the solvent-exposed loops and turns of ordered proteins, supporting an emerging structural model for disordered proteins.
format Text
id pubmed-2822292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28222922010-02-17 Comparing Models of Evolution for Ordered and Disordered Proteins Brown, Celeste J. Johnson, Audra K. Daughdrill, Gary W. Mol Biol Evol Research Articles Most models of protein evolution are based upon proteins that form relatively rigid 3D structures. A significant fraction of proteins, the so-called disordered proteins, do not form rigid 3D structures and sample a broad conformational ensemble. Disordered proteins do not typically maintain long-range interactions, so the constraints on their evolution should be different than ordered proteins. To test this hypothesis, we developed and compared models of evolution for disordered and ordered proteins. Substitution matrices were constructed using the sequences of putative homologs for sets of experimentally characterized disordered and ordered proteins. Separate matrices, at three levels of sequence similarity (>85%, 85–60%, and 60–40%), were inferred for each type of protein structure. The substitution matrices for disordered and ordered proteins differed significantly at each level of sequence similarity. The disordered matrices reflected a greater likelihood of evolutionary changes, relative to the ordered matrices, and these changes involved nonconservative substitutions. Glutamic acid and asparagine were interesting exceptions to this result. Important differences between the substitutions that are accepted in disordered proteins relative to ordered proteins were also identified. In general, disordered proteins have fewer evolutionary constraints than ordered proteins. However, some residues like tryptophan and tyrosine are highly conserved in disordered proteins. This is due to their important role in forming protein–protein interfaces. Finally, the amino acid frequencies for disordered proteins, computed during the development of the matrices, were compared with amino acid frequencies for different categories of secondary structure in ordered proteins. The highest correlations were observed between the amino acid frequencies in disordered proteins and the solvent-exposed loops and turns of ordered proteins, supporting an emerging structural model for disordered proteins. Oxford University Press 2010-03 2009-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2822292/ /pubmed/19923193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp277 Text en © 2009 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Brown, Celeste J.
Johnson, Audra K.
Daughdrill, Gary W.
Comparing Models of Evolution for Ordered and Disordered Proteins
title Comparing Models of Evolution for Ordered and Disordered Proteins
title_full Comparing Models of Evolution for Ordered and Disordered Proteins
title_fullStr Comparing Models of Evolution for Ordered and Disordered Proteins
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Models of Evolution for Ordered and Disordered Proteins
title_short Comparing Models of Evolution for Ordered and Disordered Proteins
title_sort comparing models of evolution for ordered and disordered proteins
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2822292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19923193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp277
work_keys_str_mv AT browncelestej comparingmodelsofevolutionfororderedanddisorderedproteins
AT johnsonaudrak comparingmodelsofevolutionfororderedanddisorderedproteins
AT daughdrillgaryw comparingmodelsofevolutionfororderedanddisorderedproteins