Cargando…

Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction

BACKGROUND: Most literature popularizes the efficacy of third generation instrumentation in the surgical correction of spinal deformities. A cheap and effective scoliotic deformity correction method is reviewed in this article. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal loop rectang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhojraj, Shekhar Y, Varma, Raghuprasad G, Nene, Abhay M, Mohite, Sheetal
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2822420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165677
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.58606
_version_ 1782177529260408832
author Bhojraj, Shekhar Y
Varma, Raghuprasad G
Nene, Abhay M
Mohite, Sheetal
author_facet Bhojraj, Shekhar Y
Varma, Raghuprasad G
Nene, Abhay M
Mohite, Sheetal
author_sort Bhojraj, Shekhar Y
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most literature popularizes the efficacy of third generation instrumentation in the surgical correction of spinal deformities. A cheap and effective scoliotic deformity correction method is reviewed in this article. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wires as a modality for spinal deformity correction and its co-relation with patients' satisfaction and clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty six patients of scoliotic spinal deformities with various etiologies (congenital-4, idiopathic- 25, neurofibromatosis-3, neuromuscular-2 and ‘syndromic’-3) with ages ranging from 8 to 23 years underwent corrective posterior spinal arthrodesis with stainless steel Hartshill loop rectangle and sublaminar wires. Clinicoradiological evaluation was done at an average follow-up of 6 ½ years (min-2 ½, years). Along with clinicoradiological outcome, patient satisfaction (as per the SRS 24), was accounted. RESULTS: Average preoperative Cobb's angle were 73.25° in the entire group and 66.48° in the idiopathic group. Average percentage correction was 64.34% in the entire group and the (average degree of correction was 47.13). In the idiopathic group, the respective values were 69.19% and 46°. Loss of correction in the whole group was 2.2° at two year follow up. Sagittal profiles, truncal balance were well corrected too; minimal complications were seen. Patient satisfaction results were encouraging in 36 patients as per – SRS24). About 80.2% patients were ready to undergo the same surgery if required. (SRS24). CONCLUSION: Segmental spinal fixation with locally made spinal loop rectangle and sublaminar wires is comparable as a modality to correct scoliotic spinal deformities.
format Text
id pubmed-2822420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28224202010-02-17 Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction Bhojraj, Shekhar Y Varma, Raghuprasad G Nene, Abhay M Mohite, Sheetal Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Most literature popularizes the efficacy of third generation instrumentation in the surgical correction of spinal deformities. A cheap and effective scoliotic deformity correction method is reviewed in this article. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wires as a modality for spinal deformity correction and its co-relation with patients' satisfaction and clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty six patients of scoliotic spinal deformities with various etiologies (congenital-4, idiopathic- 25, neurofibromatosis-3, neuromuscular-2 and ‘syndromic’-3) with ages ranging from 8 to 23 years underwent corrective posterior spinal arthrodesis with stainless steel Hartshill loop rectangle and sublaminar wires. Clinicoradiological evaluation was done at an average follow-up of 6 ½ years (min-2 ½, years). Along with clinicoradiological outcome, patient satisfaction (as per the SRS 24), was accounted. RESULTS: Average preoperative Cobb's angle were 73.25° in the entire group and 66.48° in the idiopathic group. Average percentage correction was 64.34% in the entire group and the (average degree of correction was 47.13). In the idiopathic group, the respective values were 69.19% and 46°. Loss of correction in the whole group was 2.2° at two year follow up. Sagittal profiles, truncal balance were well corrected too; minimal complications were seen. Patient satisfaction results were encouraging in 36 patients as per – SRS24). About 80.2% patients were ready to undergo the same surgery if required. (SRS24). CONCLUSION: Segmental spinal fixation with locally made spinal loop rectangle and sublaminar wires is comparable as a modality to correct scoliotic spinal deformities. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2822420/ /pubmed/20165677 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.58606 Text en © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bhojraj, Shekhar Y
Varma, Raghuprasad G
Nene, Abhay M
Mohite, Sheetal
Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction
title Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction
title_full Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction
title_fullStr Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction
title_full_unstemmed Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction
title_short Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction
title_sort spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2822420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165677
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.58606
work_keys_str_mv AT bhojrajshekhary spinallooprectangleandsublaminarwiringasatechniqueforscoliosiscorrection
AT varmaraghuprasadg spinallooprectangleandsublaminarwiringasatechniqueforscoliosiscorrection
AT neneabhaym spinallooprectangleandsublaminarwiringasatechniqueforscoliosiscorrection
AT mohitesheetal spinallooprectangleandsublaminarwiringasatechniqueforscoliosiscorrection