Cargando…
Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo
We assess the role of intrinsic histone-DNA interactions by mapping nucleosomes assembled in vitro on genomic DNA. Nucleosomes strongly prefer yeast DNA over E. coli DNA, indicating that the yeast genome evolved to favor nucleosome formation. Many yeast promoter and terminator regions intrinsically...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19620965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1636 |
_version_ | 1782177600579305472 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yong Moqtaderi, Zarmik Rattner, Barbara P. Euskirchen, Ghia Snyder, Michael Kadonaga, James T. Liu, X. Shirley Struhl, Kevin |
author_facet | Zhang, Yong Moqtaderi, Zarmik Rattner, Barbara P. Euskirchen, Ghia Snyder, Michael Kadonaga, James T. Liu, X. Shirley Struhl, Kevin |
author_sort | Zhang, Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | We assess the role of intrinsic histone-DNA interactions by mapping nucleosomes assembled in vitro on genomic DNA. Nucleosomes strongly prefer yeast DNA over E. coli DNA, indicating that the yeast genome evolved to favor nucleosome formation. Many yeast promoter and terminator regions intrinsically disfavor nucleosome formation, and nucleosomes assembled in vitro display strong rotational positioning. Nucleosome arrays generated by the ACF assembly factor display fewer nucleosome-free regions, reduced rotational positioning, and less translational positioning than obtained by intrinsic histone-DNA interactions. Importantly, in vitro assembled nucleosomes display only a limited preference for specific translational positions and do not show the pattern observed in vivo. Our results argue against a genomic code for nucleosome positioning, and they suggest that the nucleosomal pattern in coding regions arises primarily from statistical positioning from a barrier near the promoter that involves some aspect of transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerase II. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2823114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28231142010-02-17 Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo Zhang, Yong Moqtaderi, Zarmik Rattner, Barbara P. Euskirchen, Ghia Snyder, Michael Kadonaga, James T. Liu, X. Shirley Struhl, Kevin Nat Struct Mol Biol Article We assess the role of intrinsic histone-DNA interactions by mapping nucleosomes assembled in vitro on genomic DNA. Nucleosomes strongly prefer yeast DNA over E. coli DNA, indicating that the yeast genome evolved to favor nucleosome formation. Many yeast promoter and terminator regions intrinsically disfavor nucleosome formation, and nucleosomes assembled in vitro display strong rotational positioning. Nucleosome arrays generated by the ACF assembly factor display fewer nucleosome-free regions, reduced rotational positioning, and less translational positioning than obtained by intrinsic histone-DNA interactions. Importantly, in vitro assembled nucleosomes display only a limited preference for specific translational positions and do not show the pattern observed in vivo. Our results argue against a genomic code for nucleosome positioning, and they suggest that the nucleosomal pattern in coding regions arises primarily from statistical positioning from a barrier near the promoter that involves some aspect of transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerase II. 2009-07-20 2009-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2823114/ /pubmed/19620965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1636 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Yong Moqtaderi, Zarmik Rattner, Barbara P. Euskirchen, Ghia Snyder, Michael Kadonaga, James T. Liu, X. Shirley Struhl, Kevin Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo |
title | Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo |
title_full | Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo |
title_fullStr | Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo |
title_short | Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo |
title_sort | intrinsic histone-dna interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19620965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyong intrinsichistonednainteractionsarenotthemajordeterminantofnucleosomepositionsinvivo AT moqtaderizarmik intrinsichistonednainteractionsarenotthemajordeterminantofnucleosomepositionsinvivo AT rattnerbarbarap intrinsichistonednainteractionsarenotthemajordeterminantofnucleosomepositionsinvivo AT euskirchenghia intrinsichistonednainteractionsarenotthemajordeterminantofnucleosomepositionsinvivo AT snydermichael intrinsichistonednainteractionsarenotthemajordeterminantofnucleosomepositionsinvivo AT kadonagajamest intrinsichistonednainteractionsarenotthemajordeterminantofnucleosomepositionsinvivo AT liuxshirley intrinsichistonednainteractionsarenotthemajordeterminantofnucleosomepositionsinvivo AT struhlkevin intrinsichistonednainteractionsarenotthemajordeterminantofnucleosomepositionsinvivo |