Cargando…

Different osteosyntheses for Colles' fracture: A mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones

Background and purpose In recent years several different plate designs for internal fixation of fractures of the distal radius have been developed. However, few biomechanical studies have been performed to compare these new implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krukhaug, Yngvar, Gjerdet, Nils R, Lundberg, Odd J, Lilleng, Peer K, Hove, Leiv M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19404810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670902947440
_version_ 1782177606489079808
author Krukhaug, Yngvar
Gjerdet, Nils R
Lundberg, Odd J
Lilleng, Peer K
Hove, Leiv M
author_facet Krukhaug, Yngvar
Gjerdet, Nils R
Lundberg, Odd J
Lilleng, Peer K
Hove, Leiv M
author_sort Krukhaug, Yngvar
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose In recent years several different plate designs for internal fixation of fractures of the distal radius have been developed. However, few biomechanical studies have been performed to compare these new implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of 5 different commercially available plates (3 volar and 2 dorsal) with standard K-wire fixation using a distal radial cadaver model. Material and methods 42 human radial bones from 26 cadavers were included. The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DEXA in all bones, and the radial bones were assigned to 6 equiv alent groups based on bone density and total amount of mineral. A distal radial osteotomy was done and a dorsal 30-degree wedge of bone was removed. 1 K-wire fixation group and 5 plate groups were tested for rigidity, yield load, and maximum load. Results When data from dorsally and volarly applied plates were pooled, we did not find any statistically significant differences between them regarding stiffness, yield load, and maximum load. The K-wire group showed significantly lower yield load than 3 of the plate groups. There were no statistically significant differences in yield load between the 5 plate groups. The K-wire group showed lower rigidity than the plate groups. The K-wire group and 1 plate group failed at a statistically significant lower maximum load than the 4 other plate groups. Interpretation The volar plates had the same mechanical stability as the dorsally applied plates, and they are therefore a good alternative to dorsally applied plates. K-wire osteosynthesis was inferior to plate osteosyntheses regarding all mechanical properties.
format Text
id pubmed-2823159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28231592010-02-18 Different osteosyntheses for Colles' fracture: A mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones Krukhaug, Yngvar Gjerdet, Nils R Lundberg, Odd J Lilleng, Peer K Hove, Leiv M Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose In recent years several different plate designs for internal fixation of fractures of the distal radius have been developed. However, few biomechanical studies have been performed to compare these new implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of 5 different commercially available plates (3 volar and 2 dorsal) with standard K-wire fixation using a distal radial cadaver model. Material and methods 42 human radial bones from 26 cadavers were included. The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DEXA in all bones, and the radial bones were assigned to 6 equiv alent groups based on bone density and total amount of mineral. A distal radial osteotomy was done and a dorsal 30-degree wedge of bone was removed. 1 K-wire fixation group and 5 plate groups were tested for rigidity, yield load, and maximum load. Results When data from dorsally and volarly applied plates were pooled, we did not find any statistically significant differences between them regarding stiffness, yield load, and maximum load. The K-wire group showed significantly lower yield load than 3 of the plate groups. There were no statistically significant differences in yield load between the 5 plate groups. The K-wire group showed lower rigidity than the plate groups. The K-wire group and 1 plate group failed at a statistically significant lower maximum load than the 4 other plate groups. Interpretation The volar plates had the same mechanical stability as the dorsally applied plates, and they are therefore a good alternative to dorsally applied plates. K-wire osteosynthesis was inferior to plate osteosyntheses regarding all mechanical properties. Informa Healthcare 2009-04-29 2009-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2823159/ /pubmed/19404810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670902947440 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krukhaug, Yngvar
Gjerdet, Nils R
Lundberg, Odd J
Lilleng, Peer K
Hove, Leiv M
Different osteosyntheses for Colles' fracture: A mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones
title Different osteosyntheses for Colles' fracture: A mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones
title_full Different osteosyntheses for Colles' fracture: A mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones
title_fullStr Different osteosyntheses for Colles' fracture: A mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones
title_full_unstemmed Different osteosyntheses for Colles' fracture: A mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones
title_short Different osteosyntheses for Colles' fracture: A mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones
title_sort different osteosyntheses for colles' fracture: a mechanical study in 42 cadaver bones
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19404810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670902947440
work_keys_str_mv AT krukhaugyngvar differentosteosynthesesforcollesfractureamechanicalstudyin42cadaverbones
AT gjerdetnilsr differentosteosynthesesforcollesfractureamechanicalstudyin42cadaverbones
AT lundbergoddj differentosteosynthesesforcollesfractureamechanicalstudyin42cadaverbones
AT lillengpeerk differentosteosynthesesforcollesfractureamechanicalstudyin42cadaverbones
AT hoveleivm differentosteosynthesesforcollesfractureamechanicalstudyin42cadaverbones