Cargando…

In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose Under physiological loads, debonded cemented femoral stems have been shown to move within their cement mantle and generate a fluid pump that may facilitate peri-prosthetic osteolysis by pressurizing fluid and circulating wear debris. The long-term physiological loading of roug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartlett, Gavin E, Gill, Harinderjit S, Murray, David W, Beard, David J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19404792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670902947382
_version_ 1782177606981910528
author Bartlett, Gavin E
Gill, Harinderjit S
Murray, David W
Beard, David J
author_facet Bartlett, Gavin E
Gill, Harinderjit S
Murray, David W
Beard, David J
author_sort Bartlett, Gavin E
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose Under physiological loads, debonded cemented femoral stems have been shown to move within their cement mantle and generate a fluid pump that may facilitate peri-prosthetic osteolysis by pressurizing fluid and circulating wear debris. The long-term physiological loading of rough and polished tapered stems in vitro has shown differences in performance, with greater interface pressures generated by the rough stems. In this study we investigated the individual effects of stem surface finish, degree of mantle wear, and mode of loading on the stem pump mechanism. Method Rough and polished stems were loaded under different regimes in artificially worn cement mantles that permitted either 2 or 5 degrees of rotational stem movement, and the interface pressures were compared. Results The pressures generated by the rough and polished stems were similar in either type of mantle. The pattern of pressure generation in the 2-degree mantles was similar to the pressures generated by rough stems after long-term loading, but the high posterior wall pressures fell and the tip pressures increased in the 5-degree mantles. The torsional loads were principal drivers of pressure generation in all areas of the interface other than the implant tip, where axial loading predominated. Interpretation Femoral stems with rotational instability under cyclic torsional loads generate elevated interface fluid pressures and flows independently of stem surface finish. The rough surface finish is only important in creating this instability in tapered stems.
format Text
id pubmed-2823161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28231612010-02-18 In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty Bartlett, Gavin E Gill, Harinderjit S Murray, David W Beard, David J Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose Under physiological loads, debonded cemented femoral stems have been shown to move within their cement mantle and generate a fluid pump that may facilitate peri-prosthetic osteolysis by pressurizing fluid and circulating wear debris. The long-term physiological loading of rough and polished tapered stems in vitro has shown differences in performance, with greater interface pressures generated by the rough stems. In this study we investigated the individual effects of stem surface finish, degree of mantle wear, and mode of loading on the stem pump mechanism. Method Rough and polished stems were loaded under different regimes in artificially worn cement mantles that permitted either 2 or 5 degrees of rotational stem movement, and the interface pressures were compared. Results The pressures generated by the rough and polished stems were similar in either type of mantle. The pattern of pressure generation in the 2-degree mantles was similar to the pressures generated by rough stems after long-term loading, but the high posterior wall pressures fell and the tip pressures increased in the 5-degree mantles. The torsional loads were principal drivers of pressure generation in all areas of the interface other than the implant tip, where axial loading predominated. Interpretation Femoral stems with rotational instability under cyclic torsional loads generate elevated interface fluid pressures and flows independently of stem surface finish. The rough surface finish is only important in creating this instability in tapered stems. Informa Healthcare 2009-04-29 2009-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2823161/ /pubmed/19404792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670902947382 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bartlett, Gavin E
Gill, Harinderjit S
Murray, David W
Beard, David J
In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty
title In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty
title_full In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty
title_short In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty
title_sort in vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19404792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670902947382
work_keys_str_mv AT bartlettgavine invitroinfluenceofstemsurfacefinishandmantleconformityonpressuregenerationincementedhiparthroplasty
AT gillharinderjits invitroinfluenceofstemsurfacefinishandmantleconformityonpressuregenerationincementedhiparthroplasty
AT murraydavidw invitroinfluenceofstemsurfacefinishandmantleconformityonpressuregenerationincementedhiparthroplasty
AT bearddavidj invitroinfluenceofstemsurfacefinishandmantleconformityonpressuregenerationincementedhiparthroplasty