Cargando…
Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients
Background and purpose Over the last 5 years, there has been increasing interest in reducing length of hospitalization (LOS) through accelerated programs. We examined the clinical outcome of patients undergoing a unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in an accelerated care program (A group) compar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19513890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903035559 |
_version_ | 1782177619537559552 |
---|---|
author | Borgwardt, Lotte Zerahn, Bo Bliddal, Henning Christiansen, Christian Sylvest, Jesper Borgwardt, Arne |
author_facet | Borgwardt, Lotte Zerahn, Bo Bliddal, Henning Christiansen, Christian Sylvest, Jesper Borgwardt, Arne |
author_sort | Borgwardt, Lotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and purpose Over the last 5 years, there has been increasing interest in reducing length of hospitalization (LOS) through accelerated programs. We examined the clinical outcome of patients undergoing a unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in an accelerated care program (A group) compared to a conventional care program (C group). Methods 40 patients randomized into 2 groups were included (A group: 17 patients; C group: 23 patients). Nausea, micturition problems, lower limb dysfunction, pain (VAS), opiate consumption, Knee Society score (KSS), day of discharge, rehospitalization within 3 months, contact with a general physician or nurse, and level of satisfaction were registered. Patients in the A group attended an information meeting. An intraarticular infiltration with Marcaine and adrenaline was used peroperatively. Patients in the C group had an epidural pump for 2 or 3 days. Patients in the A program were treated with NSAID and paracetamol postoperatively. Opiates were used in both groups in the case of breakthrough pain. The patients were considered ready for discharge when they were able to climb stairs to the second floor within 5 min. Results The median length of stay was 1 (1–3) day in the A group and 6 (4–7) days in the C group. The median pain score (VAS) at day 0 was 1 (0–3) in the A group and 5 (0–8) in the C group (p < 0.001). 11/23 of the patients in the C group had weakness of the lower limbs on day 1 due to the epidural; all patients in the A group were exercising on the day of the operation. Micturition problems necessitating intermediate catherization were more frequent in patients in the C program (19/23) than in patients in the A programme (3/17) (p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning nausea, average pain on days 1 and 2, use of opioids (during the first week postoperatively), KSS, contact with primary sector, level of satisfaction, or level of confidence. Interpretation We achieved a reduction in LOS of 5 days without affecting the clinical outcome. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2823215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28232152010-02-18 Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients Borgwardt, Lotte Zerahn, Bo Bliddal, Henning Christiansen, Christian Sylvest, Jesper Borgwardt, Arne Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose Over the last 5 years, there has been increasing interest in reducing length of hospitalization (LOS) through accelerated programs. We examined the clinical outcome of patients undergoing a unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in an accelerated care program (A group) compared to a conventional care program (C group). Methods 40 patients randomized into 2 groups were included (A group: 17 patients; C group: 23 patients). Nausea, micturition problems, lower limb dysfunction, pain (VAS), opiate consumption, Knee Society score (KSS), day of discharge, rehospitalization within 3 months, contact with a general physician or nurse, and level of satisfaction were registered. Patients in the A group attended an information meeting. An intraarticular infiltration with Marcaine and adrenaline was used peroperatively. Patients in the C group had an epidural pump for 2 or 3 days. Patients in the A program were treated with NSAID and paracetamol postoperatively. Opiates were used in both groups in the case of breakthrough pain. The patients were considered ready for discharge when they were able to climb stairs to the second floor within 5 min. Results The median length of stay was 1 (1–3) day in the A group and 6 (4–7) days in the C group. The median pain score (VAS) at day 0 was 1 (0–3) in the A group and 5 (0–8) in the C group (p < 0.001). 11/23 of the patients in the C group had weakness of the lower limbs on day 1 due to the epidural; all patients in the A group were exercising on the day of the operation. Micturition problems necessitating intermediate catherization were more frequent in patients in the C program (19/23) than in patients in the A programme (3/17) (p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning nausea, average pain on days 1 and 2, use of opioids (during the first week postoperatively), KSS, contact with primary sector, level of satisfaction, or level of confidence. Interpretation We achieved a reduction in LOS of 5 days without affecting the clinical outcome. Informa Healthcare 2009-06-05 2009-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2823215/ /pubmed/19513890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903035559 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Borgwardt, Lotte Zerahn, Bo Bliddal, Henning Christiansen, Christian Sylvest, Jesper Borgwardt, Arne Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients |
title | Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients |
title_full | Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients |
title_fullStr | Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients |
title_short | Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients |
title_sort | similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: a randomized, controlled study of 40 patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19513890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903035559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borgwardtlotte similarclinicaloutcomeafterunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyusingaconventionaloracceleratedcareprogramarandomizedcontrolledstudyof40patients AT zerahnbo similarclinicaloutcomeafterunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyusingaconventionaloracceleratedcareprogramarandomizedcontrolledstudyof40patients AT bliddalhenning similarclinicaloutcomeafterunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyusingaconventionaloracceleratedcareprogramarandomizedcontrolledstudyof40patients AT christiansenchristian similarclinicaloutcomeafterunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyusingaconventionaloracceleratedcareprogramarandomizedcontrolledstudyof40patients AT sylvestjesper similarclinicaloutcomeafterunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyusingaconventionaloracceleratedcareprogramarandomizedcontrolledstudyof40patients AT borgwardtarne similarclinicaloutcomeafterunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyusingaconventionaloracceleratedcareprogramarandomizedcontrolledstudyof40patients |