Cargando…

Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years

Background and purpose Periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented femoral hip revision is a matter of concern. We have used a proximally porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis (Bi-Metric) in revision since 1989 and now we report the bone changes. This prosthesis is intended to distribute the fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adolphson, Per Y, Salemyr, Mats OF, Sköldenberg, Olof G, Bodén, Henrik SG
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19234883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670902804802
_version_ 1782177621881126912
author Adolphson, Per Y
Salemyr, Mats OF
Sköldenberg, Olof G
Bodén, Henrik SG
author_facet Adolphson, Per Y
Salemyr, Mats OF
Sköldenberg, Olof G
Bodén, Henrik SG
author_sort Adolphson, Per Y
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose Periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented femoral hip revision is a matter of concern. We have used a proximally porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis (Bi-Metric) in revision since 1989 and now we report the bone changes. This prosthesis is intended to distribute the forces more evenly and to avoid proximal femoral unloading. Methods 22 patients were unilaterally reoperated because of aseptic loosening. Only patients with a healthy contralateral hip were included. Mean age at revision was 69 (55–80) years. Bone defects were graded by Gustilo-Pasternak and Endo-Klinik classifications. Clinical assessment was performed with Harris hip score. We used radiographs and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate migration, femoral remodeling, and bone mineral density after 72 (30–158) months. Results The mean Harris hip score was 74 (30–100) points at follow-up. Mild thigh discomfort was present in 1 patient and moderate thigh pain in 3 patients. There was no loosening or subsidence. Osteolysis seen at revision had diminished in 19 of the 22 hips at follow-up. We noted a large reduction in bone mineral density. It was most pronounced in Gruen regions 1, 2, 6, and 7. Interpretation Revision with this stem is a reliable procedure; however, we noted a large degree of proximal bone loss that could lead to later mechanical complications or fractures.
format Text
id pubmed-2823225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28232252010-02-18 Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years Adolphson, Per Y Salemyr, Mats OF Sköldenberg, Olof G Bodén, Henrik SG Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose Periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented femoral hip revision is a matter of concern. We have used a proximally porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis (Bi-Metric) in revision since 1989 and now we report the bone changes. This prosthesis is intended to distribute the forces more evenly and to avoid proximal femoral unloading. Methods 22 patients were unilaterally reoperated because of aseptic loosening. Only patients with a healthy contralateral hip were included. Mean age at revision was 69 (55–80) years. Bone defects were graded by Gustilo-Pasternak and Endo-Klinik classifications. Clinical assessment was performed with Harris hip score. We used radiographs and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate migration, femoral remodeling, and bone mineral density after 72 (30–158) months. Results The mean Harris hip score was 74 (30–100) points at follow-up. Mild thigh discomfort was present in 1 patient and moderate thigh pain in 3 patients. There was no loosening or subsidence. Osteolysis seen at revision had diminished in 19 of the 22 hips at follow-up. We noted a large reduction in bone mineral density. It was most pronounced in Gruen regions 1, 2, 6, and 7. Interpretation Revision with this stem is a reliable procedure; however, we noted a large degree of proximal bone loss that could lead to later mechanical complications or fractures. Informa Healthcare 2009-02-26 2009-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2823225/ /pubmed/19234883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670902804802 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adolphson, Per Y
Salemyr, Mats OF
Sköldenberg, Olof G
Bodén, Henrik SG
Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years
title Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years
title_full Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years
title_fullStr Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years
title_full_unstemmed Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years
title_short Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years
title_sort large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated bi-metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19234883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670902804802
work_keys_str_mv AT adolphsonpery largefemoralbonelossafterhiprevisionusingtheuncementedproximallyporouscoatedbimetricprosthesis22hipsfollowedforameanof6years
AT salemyrmatsof largefemoralbonelossafterhiprevisionusingtheuncementedproximallyporouscoatedbimetricprosthesis22hipsfollowedforameanof6years
AT skoldenbergolofg largefemoralbonelossafterhiprevisionusingtheuncementedproximallyporouscoatedbimetricprosthesis22hipsfollowedforameanof6years
AT bodenhenriksg largefemoralbonelossafterhiprevisionusingtheuncementedproximallyporouscoatedbimetricprosthesis22hipsfollowedforameanof6years