Cargando…

Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: A systematic review of the literature

Background and purpose Two-stage revision remains the gold standard in the treatment of infected knee arthroplasty. Lately, good long-term results of direct exchange arthroplasty have been reported. The purpose of this literature review is to compare the clinical outcome achieved with one-stage revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jämsen, Esa, Stogiannidis, Ioannis, Malmivaara, Antti, Pajamäki, Jorma, Puolakka, Timo, Konttinen, Yrjö T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19234888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670902805064
_version_ 1782177625247055872
author Jämsen, Esa
Stogiannidis, Ioannis
Malmivaara, Antti
Pajamäki, Jorma
Puolakka, Timo
Konttinen, Yrjö T
author_facet Jämsen, Esa
Stogiannidis, Ioannis
Malmivaara, Antti
Pajamäki, Jorma
Puolakka, Timo
Konttinen, Yrjö T
author_sort Jämsen, Esa
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose Two-stage revision remains the gold standard in the treatment of infected knee arthroplasty. Lately, good long-term results of direct exchange arthroplasty have been reported. The purpose of this literature review is to compare the clinical outcome achieved with one-stage revision and two-stage revision with different types of spacers. Methods A thorough systematic review of literature was undertaken to idenepsy reports on the treatment alternatives. Papers written in English or including an English abstract, published from 1980 through 2005, and reporting either the success rate in eradication of infection or the clinical status achieved were reviewed. 31 original articles describing the results of 154 one-stage exchange arthoplasties and of 926 two-stage exchange arthoplasties were included. The depth of detail in the description of materials and methods varied markedly, making it impossible to perform a meta-analysis. Instead, a descriptive review of the results is presented. Results With a follow-up of 12–122 months, the overall success rate in eradication of infection was 73–100% after one-stage revisions and 82–100% after two-stage revisions. Reinfection rates were the lowest in series where articulating cement spacers were used, though the follow-up was relatively short. Studies using articulating spacers reported the highest average postoperative ranges of motion. Otherwise, no correlations were observed between the clinical outcome and the length of follow-up, the type of revision, or the type of spacer. The clinical outcome (knee scores and range of motion) of the one-stage revisions was no different from that of the two-stage revisions. Interpretation Two-stage exchange is an effective treatment. Mobile spacers may further improve the range of motion. More experience in one-stage revision is required in order to define its role in the management of infected knee arthroplasties.
format Text
id pubmed-2823239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28232392010-02-18 Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: A systematic review of the literature Jämsen, Esa Stogiannidis, Ioannis Malmivaara, Antti Pajamäki, Jorma Puolakka, Timo Konttinen, Yrjö T Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose Two-stage revision remains the gold standard in the treatment of infected knee arthroplasty. Lately, good long-term results of direct exchange arthroplasty have been reported. The purpose of this literature review is to compare the clinical outcome achieved with one-stage revision and two-stage revision with different types of spacers. Methods A thorough systematic review of literature was undertaken to idenepsy reports on the treatment alternatives. Papers written in English or including an English abstract, published from 1980 through 2005, and reporting either the success rate in eradication of infection or the clinical status achieved were reviewed. 31 original articles describing the results of 154 one-stage exchange arthoplasties and of 926 two-stage exchange arthoplasties were included. The depth of detail in the description of materials and methods varied markedly, making it impossible to perform a meta-analysis. Instead, a descriptive review of the results is presented. Results With a follow-up of 12–122 months, the overall success rate in eradication of infection was 73–100% after one-stage revisions and 82–100% after two-stage revisions. Reinfection rates were the lowest in series where articulating cement spacers were used, though the follow-up was relatively short. Studies using articulating spacers reported the highest average postoperative ranges of motion. Otherwise, no correlations were observed between the clinical outcome and the length of follow-up, the type of revision, or the type of spacer. The clinical outcome (knee scores and range of motion) of the one-stage revisions was no different from that of the two-stage revisions. Interpretation Two-stage exchange is an effective treatment. Mobile spacers may further improve the range of motion. More experience in one-stage revision is required in order to define its role in the management of infected knee arthroplasties. Informa Healthcare 2009-02-26 2009-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2823239/ /pubmed/19234888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670902805064 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jämsen, Esa
Stogiannidis, Ioannis
Malmivaara, Antti
Pajamäki, Jorma
Puolakka, Timo
Konttinen, Yrjö T
Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: A systematic review of the literature
title Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: A systematic review of the literature
title_full Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: A systematic review of the literature
title_short Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: A systematic review of the literature
title_sort outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach: a systematic review of the literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19234888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670902805064
work_keys_str_mv AT jamsenesa outcomeofprosthesisexchangeforinfectedkneearthroplastytheeffectoftreatmentapproachasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT stogiannidisioannis outcomeofprosthesisexchangeforinfectedkneearthroplastytheeffectoftreatmentapproachasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT malmivaaraantti outcomeofprosthesisexchangeforinfectedkneearthroplastytheeffectoftreatmentapproachasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT pajamakijorma outcomeofprosthesisexchangeforinfectedkneearthroplastytheeffectoftreatmentapproachasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT puolakkatimo outcomeofprosthesisexchangeforinfectedkneearthroplastytheeffectoftreatmentapproachasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT konttinenyrjot outcomeofprosthesisexchangeforinfectedkneearthroplastytheeffectoftreatmentapproachasystematicreviewoftheliterature