Cargando…

Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases

Background and purpose Revision surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures around an unstable cemented femoral stem traditionally requires removal of existing cement. We propose a new technique whereby a well-fixed cement mantle can be retained in cases with simple fractures that can be reduced an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briant-Evans, Toby W, Veeramootoo, Darmaraja, Tsiridis, Eleftherios, Hubble, Matthew J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903316827
_version_ 1782177634500739072
author Briant-Evans, Toby W
Veeramootoo, Darmaraja
Tsiridis, Eleftherios
Hubble, Matthew J
author_facet Briant-Evans, Toby W
Veeramootoo, Darmaraja
Tsiridis, Eleftherios
Hubble, Matthew J
author_sort Briant-Evans, Toby W
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose Revision surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures around an unstable cemented femoral stem traditionally requires removal of existing cement. We propose a new technique whereby a well-fixed cement mantle can be retained in cases with simple fractures that can be reduced anatomically when a cemented revision is planned. This technique is well established in femoral stem revision, but not in association with a fracture. Patients and methods We treated 23 Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures by reducing the fracture and cementing a revision stem into the pre-existing cement mantle, with or without supplementary fixation. Results 3 patients died in the first 6 months for reasons unrelated to surgery. In addition, 1 was too frail to attend follow-up and was therefore excluded from the study, and 1 patient underwent revision surgery for a nonunion. The remaining 18 cases all healed with radiographic union after an average time of 4.4 (2–11) months. There was no sign of loosening or subsidence of the revision stems within the old cement mantle in any of these cases at the most recent follow-up after an average of 3 (0.3–9) years. Interpretation Our results support the use of the cement-in-cement revision in anatomically reducible periprosthetic fractures with a well-preserved pre-existing cement mantle. This technique is particularly useful for the elderly patient and for those who are not fit for prolonged surgical procedures.
format Text
id pubmed-2823329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28233292010-02-18 Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases Briant-Evans, Toby W Veeramootoo, Darmaraja Tsiridis, Eleftherios Hubble, Matthew J Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose Revision surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures around an unstable cemented femoral stem traditionally requires removal of existing cement. We propose a new technique whereby a well-fixed cement mantle can be retained in cases with simple fractures that can be reduced anatomically when a cemented revision is planned. This technique is well established in femoral stem revision, but not in association with a fracture. Patients and methods We treated 23 Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures by reducing the fracture and cementing a revision stem into the pre-existing cement mantle, with or without supplementary fixation. Results 3 patients died in the first 6 months for reasons unrelated to surgery. In addition, 1 was too frail to attend follow-up and was therefore excluded from the study, and 1 patient underwent revision surgery for a nonunion. The remaining 18 cases all healed with radiographic union after an average time of 4.4 (2–11) months. There was no sign of loosening or subsidence of the revision stems within the old cement mantle in any of these cases at the most recent follow-up after an average of 3 (0.3–9) years. Interpretation Our results support the use of the cement-in-cement revision in anatomically reducible periprosthetic fractures with a well-preserved pre-existing cement mantle. This technique is particularly useful for the elderly patient and for those who are not fit for prolonged surgical procedures. Informa Healthcare 2009-10-01 2009-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2823329/ /pubmed/19916687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903316827 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Briant-Evans, Toby W
Veeramootoo, Darmaraja
Tsiridis, Eleftherios
Hubble, Matthew J
Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases
title Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases
title_full Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases
title_fullStr Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases
title_full_unstemmed Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases
title_short Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases
title_sort cement-in-cement stem revision for vancouver type b periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up of 23 cases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903316827
work_keys_str_mv AT briantevanstobyw cementincementstemrevisionforvancouvertypebperiprostheticfemoralfracturesaftertotalhiparthroplastya3yearfollowupof23cases
AT veeramootoodarmaraja cementincementstemrevisionforvancouvertypebperiprostheticfemoralfracturesaftertotalhiparthroplastya3yearfollowupof23cases
AT tsiridiseleftherios cementincementstemrevisionforvancouvertypebperiprostheticfemoralfracturesaftertotalhiparthroplastya3yearfollowupof23cases
AT hubblematthewj cementincementstemrevisionforvancouvertypebperiprostheticfemoralfracturesaftertotalhiparthroplastya3yearfollowupof23cases