Cargando…
Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI
Background and purpose Immobilization in external rotation (ER) for shoulder dislocation has been reported to improve the coaptation of Bankart lesions to the glenoid. We compared the position of the labrum in patients treated with immobilization in ER or internal rotation (IR). A secondary aim was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903278266 |
_version_ | 1782177637924339712 |
---|---|
author | Liavaag, Sigurd Stiris, Morten Georg Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke Enger, Martine Svenningsen, Svein Brox, Jens Ivar |
author_facet | Liavaag, Sigurd Stiris, Morten Georg Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke Enger, Martine Svenningsen, Svein Brox, Jens Ivar |
author_sort | Liavaag, Sigurd |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and purpose Immobilization in external rotation (ER) for shoulder dislocation has been reported to improve the coaptation of Bankart lesions to the glenoid. We compared the position of the labrum in patients treated with immobilization in ER or internal rotation (IR). A secondary aim was to evaluate the rate of Bankart lesions. Patients and methods 55 patients with primary anterior shoulder dislocation, aged between 16 and 40 years, were randomized to immobilization in ER or IR. Computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed shortly after the injury. After the immobilization, MRI arthrography was performed. We evaluated the rate of Bankart lesions and measured the separation and displacement of the labrum as well as the length of the detached part of the capsule on the glenoid neck. Results Immobilization in ER reduced the number of Bankart lesions (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.1 –13; p = 0.04). Separation decreased to a larger extent in the ER group than in the IR group (mean difference 0.6 mm, 95% CI: 0.1 – 1.1, p = 0.03). Displacement of the labrum and the detached part of the capsule showed no significant differences between the groups. Interpretation Immobilization in ER results in improved coaptation of the labrum after primary traumatic shoulder dislocation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2823343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28233432010-02-18 Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI Liavaag, Sigurd Stiris, Morten Georg Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke Enger, Martine Svenningsen, Svein Brox, Jens Ivar Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose Immobilization in external rotation (ER) for shoulder dislocation has been reported to improve the coaptation of Bankart lesions to the glenoid. We compared the position of the labrum in patients treated with immobilization in ER or internal rotation (IR). A secondary aim was to evaluate the rate of Bankart lesions. Patients and methods 55 patients with primary anterior shoulder dislocation, aged between 16 and 40 years, were randomized to immobilization in ER or IR. Computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed shortly after the injury. After the immobilization, MRI arthrography was performed. We evaluated the rate of Bankart lesions and measured the separation and displacement of the labrum as well as the length of the detached part of the capsule on the glenoid neck. Results Immobilization in ER reduced the number of Bankart lesions (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.1 –13; p = 0.04). Separation decreased to a larger extent in the ER group than in the IR group (mean difference 0.6 mm, 95% CI: 0.1 – 1.1, p = 0.03). Displacement of the labrum and the detached part of the capsule showed no significant differences between the groups. Interpretation Immobilization in ER results in improved coaptation of the labrum after primary traumatic shoulder dislocation. Informa Healthcare 2009-10-01 2009-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2823343/ /pubmed/19916693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903278266 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liavaag, Sigurd Stiris, Morten Georg Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke Enger, Martine Svenningsen, Svein Brox, Jens Ivar Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI |
title | Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI |
title_full | Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI |
title_fullStr | Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI |
title_short | Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI |
title_sort | do bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: a randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with mri |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903278266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liavaagsigurd dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri AT stirismortengeorg dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri AT lindlandelisabethstokke dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri AT engermartine dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri AT svenningsensvein dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri AT broxjensivar dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri |