Cargando…

Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI

Background and purpose Immobilization in external rotation (ER) for shoulder dislocation has been reported to improve the coaptation of Bankart lesions to the glenoid. We compared the position of the labrum in patients treated with immobilization in ER or internal rotation (IR). A secondary aim was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liavaag, Sigurd, Stiris, Morten Georg, Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke, Enger, Martine, Svenningsen, Svein, Brox, Jens Ivar
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903278266
_version_ 1782177637924339712
author Liavaag, Sigurd
Stiris, Morten Georg
Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke
Enger, Martine
Svenningsen, Svein
Brox, Jens Ivar
author_facet Liavaag, Sigurd
Stiris, Morten Georg
Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke
Enger, Martine
Svenningsen, Svein
Brox, Jens Ivar
author_sort Liavaag, Sigurd
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose Immobilization in external rotation (ER) for shoulder dislocation has been reported to improve the coaptation of Bankart lesions to the glenoid. We compared the position of the labrum in patients treated with immobilization in ER or internal rotation (IR). A secondary aim was to evaluate the rate of Bankart lesions. Patients and methods 55 patients with primary anterior shoulder dislocation, aged between 16 and 40 years, were randomized to immobilization in ER or IR. Computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed shortly after the injury. After the immobilization, MRI arthrography was performed. We evaluated the rate of Bankart lesions and measured the separation and displacement of the labrum as well as the length of the detached part of the capsule on the glenoid neck. Results Immobilization in ER reduced the number of Bankart lesions (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.1 –13; p = 0.04). Separation decreased to a larger extent in the ER group than in the IR group (mean difference 0.6 mm, 95% CI: 0.1 – 1.1, p = 0.03). Displacement of the labrum and the detached part of the capsule showed no significant differences between the groups. Interpretation Immobilization in ER results in improved coaptation of the labrum after primary traumatic shoulder dislocation.
format Text
id pubmed-2823343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28233432010-02-18 Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI Liavaag, Sigurd Stiris, Morten Georg Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke Enger, Martine Svenningsen, Svein Brox, Jens Ivar Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose Immobilization in external rotation (ER) for shoulder dislocation has been reported to improve the coaptation of Bankart lesions to the glenoid. We compared the position of the labrum in patients treated with immobilization in ER or internal rotation (IR). A secondary aim was to evaluate the rate of Bankart lesions. Patients and methods 55 patients with primary anterior shoulder dislocation, aged between 16 and 40 years, were randomized to immobilization in ER or IR. Computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed shortly after the injury. After the immobilization, MRI arthrography was performed. We evaluated the rate of Bankart lesions and measured the separation and displacement of the labrum as well as the length of the detached part of the capsule on the glenoid neck. Results Immobilization in ER reduced the number of Bankart lesions (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.1 –13; p = 0.04). Separation decreased to a larger extent in the ER group than in the IR group (mean difference 0.6 mm, 95% CI: 0.1 – 1.1, p = 0.03). Displacement of the labrum and the detached part of the capsule showed no significant differences between the groups. Interpretation Immobilization in ER results in improved coaptation of the labrum after primary traumatic shoulder dislocation. Informa Healthcare 2009-10-01 2009-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2823343/ /pubmed/19916693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903278266 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liavaag, Sigurd
Stiris, Morten Georg
Lindland, Elisabeth Stokke
Enger, Martine
Svenningsen, Svein
Brox, Jens Ivar
Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI
title Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI
title_full Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI
title_fullStr Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI
title_full_unstemmed Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI
title_short Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: A randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI
title_sort do bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation?: a randomized single-blind study of 55 patients examined with mri
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453670903278266
work_keys_str_mv AT liavaagsigurd dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri
AT stirismortengeorg dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri
AT lindlandelisabethstokke dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri
AT engermartine dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri
AT svenningsensvein dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri
AT broxjensivar dobankartlesionshealbetterinshouldersimmobilizedinexternalrotationarandomizedsingleblindstudyof55patientsexaminedwithmri