Cargando…
Psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life
Basing ourselves on the writings of Hans Jonas, we offer to psychosomatic medicine a philosophy of life that surmounts the mind-body dualism which has plagued Western thought since the origins of modern science in seventeenth century Europe. Any present-day account of reality must draw upon everythi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20089202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-5-2 |
_version_ | 1782177650942410752 |
---|---|
author | Schwartz, Michael A Wiggins, Osborne P |
author_facet | Schwartz, Michael A Wiggins, Osborne P |
author_sort | Schwartz, Michael A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Basing ourselves on the writings of Hans Jonas, we offer to psychosomatic medicine a philosophy of life that surmounts the mind-body dualism which has plagued Western thought since the origins of modern science in seventeenth century Europe. Any present-day account of reality must draw upon everything we know about the living and the non-living. Since we are living beings ourselves, we know what it means to be alive from our own first-hand experience. Therefore, our philosophy of life, in addition to starting with what empirical science tells us about inorganic and organic reality, must also begin from our own direct experience of life in ourselves and in others; it can then show how the two meet in the living being. Since life is ultimately one reality, our theory must reintegrate psyche with soma such that no component of the whole is short-changed, neither the objective nor the subjective. In this essay, we lay out the foundational components of such a theory by clarifying the defining features of living beings as polarities. We describe three such polarities: 1) Being vs. non-being: Always threatened by non-being, the organism must constantly re-assert its being through its own activity. 2) World-relatedness vs. self-enclosure: Living beings are both enclosed with themselves, defined by the boundaries that separate them from their environment, while they are also ceaselessly reaching out to their environment and engaging in transactions with it. 3) Dependence vs. independence: Living beings are both dependent on the material components that constitute them at any given moment and independent of any particular groupings of these components over time. We then discuss important features of the polarities of life: Metabolism; organic structure; enclosure by a semi-permeable membrane; distinction between "self" and "other"; autonomy; neediness; teleology; sensitivity; values. Moral needs and values already arise at the most basic levels of life, even if only human beings can recognize such values as moral requirements and develop responses to them. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2823620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28236202010-02-18 Psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life Schwartz, Michael A Wiggins, Osborne P Philos Ethics Humanit Med Commentary Basing ourselves on the writings of Hans Jonas, we offer to psychosomatic medicine a philosophy of life that surmounts the mind-body dualism which has plagued Western thought since the origins of modern science in seventeenth century Europe. Any present-day account of reality must draw upon everything we know about the living and the non-living. Since we are living beings ourselves, we know what it means to be alive from our own first-hand experience. Therefore, our philosophy of life, in addition to starting with what empirical science tells us about inorganic and organic reality, must also begin from our own direct experience of life in ourselves and in others; it can then show how the two meet in the living being. Since life is ultimately one reality, our theory must reintegrate psyche with soma such that no component of the whole is short-changed, neither the objective nor the subjective. In this essay, we lay out the foundational components of such a theory by clarifying the defining features of living beings as polarities. We describe three such polarities: 1) Being vs. non-being: Always threatened by non-being, the organism must constantly re-assert its being through its own activity. 2) World-relatedness vs. self-enclosure: Living beings are both enclosed with themselves, defined by the boundaries that separate them from their environment, while they are also ceaselessly reaching out to their environment and engaging in transactions with it. 3) Dependence vs. independence: Living beings are both dependent on the material components that constitute them at any given moment and independent of any particular groupings of these components over time. We then discuss important features of the polarities of life: Metabolism; organic structure; enclosure by a semi-permeable membrane; distinction between "self" and "other"; autonomy; neediness; teleology; sensitivity; values. Moral needs and values already arise at the most basic levels of life, even if only human beings can recognize such values as moral requirements and develop responses to them. BioMed Central 2010-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2823620/ /pubmed/20089202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-5-2 Text en Copyright ©2010 Schwartz and Wiggins; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Schwartz, Michael A Wiggins, Osborne P Psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life |
title | Psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life |
title_full | Psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life |
title_fullStr | Psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life |
title_short | Psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life |
title_sort | psychosomatic medicine and the philosophy of life |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20089202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-5-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwartzmichaela psychosomaticmedicineandthephilosophyoflife AT wigginsosbornep psychosomaticmedicineandthephilosophyoflife |