Cargando…

Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration

A good questionnaire design for a clinical trial will minimise bias and maximise precision in the estimates of treatment effect within budget. Attempts to collect more data than will be analysed may risk reducing recruitment (reducing power) and increasing losses to follow-up (possibly introducing b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Edwards, Phil
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20064225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-2
_version_ 1782177675221139456
author Edwards, Phil
author_facet Edwards, Phil
author_sort Edwards, Phil
collection PubMed
description A good questionnaire design for a clinical trial will minimise bias and maximise precision in the estimates of treatment effect within budget. Attempts to collect more data than will be analysed may risk reducing recruitment (reducing power) and increasing losses to follow-up (possibly introducing bias). The mode of administration can also impact on the cost, quality and completeness of data collected. There is good evidence for design features that improve data completeness but further research is required to evaluate strategies in clinical trials. Theory-based guidelines for style, appearance, and layout of self-administered questionnaires have been proposed but require evaluation.
format Text
id pubmed-2823735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28237352010-02-18 Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration Edwards, Phil Trials Review A good questionnaire design for a clinical trial will minimise bias and maximise precision in the estimates of treatment effect within budget. Attempts to collect more data than will be analysed may risk reducing recruitment (reducing power) and increasing losses to follow-up (possibly introducing bias). The mode of administration can also impact on the cost, quality and completeness of data collected. There is good evidence for design features that improve data completeness but further research is required to evaluate strategies in clinical trials. Theory-based guidelines for style, appearance, and layout of self-administered questionnaires have been proposed but require evaluation. BioMed Central 2010-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2823735/ /pubmed/20064225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-2 Text en Copyright ©2010 Edwards; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Edwards, Phil
Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
title Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
title_full Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
title_fullStr Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
title_full_unstemmed Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
title_short Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
title_sort questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20064225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-2
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsphil questionnairesinclinicaltrialsguidelinesforoptimaldesignandadministration